Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 88 judicial notice Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 672 results (0.126 seconds)

Jiyaul Hasan and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

..... rental related to the shared household and maintenance; (b) disposal of household effects, any alienation of assets whether movable or immovable, valuables, shares, securities, bonds and the like or other property in which the aggrieved person has an interest or is entitled to use by virtue of the domestic relationship or ..... cause bodily pain, harm, or danger to life, limb, or health or impair the health or development of the aggrieved person and includes assault, criminal intimidation and criminal force; (ii) " sexual abuse" includes any conduct of a sexual nature that abuses, humiliates, degrades or otherwise violates the dignity of woman; (iii) " verbal and ..... entitled to use or enjoy by virtue of the domestic relationship including access to the shared household. explanation ii.- for the purpose of determining whether any act, omission, commission or conduct of the respondent constitutes" domestic violence" under this section, the overall facts and circumstances of the case shall be taken .....

Pandav Sarkar Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1855

..... submitted and it is a recovery which was made in day time, there was no reason for the border security force personnel to falsely implicate the appellant in a false case. he further submitted that section 57 of ndps act is directory in nature and its non-compliance will not vitiate conviction and effect credibility of testimonies of fact ..... 1 of 2000, state of u.p. verses pandav sarkar, u/s section 20 n.d.p.s. act, ps madho tanda, in this appeal. 2. according to prosecution allegations, s.i. surendra kumar tyagi of border security force along with constables munesh kumar and khushhal prasad were on routine beat petrol on 30.9.1999 and they left ..... border out post naujalia towards village kutia kavar and when they were proceeding on nature trail/ footpath (pagdandi) .....

Dhruv Singh Yadav Vs. Director General Central Industrial Security For ...

Court : Allahabad

..... the central government under section 47 of the pwd act, exempting all categories of posts of 'combatant personnel' only of the central para military forces (cpmfs) namely central reserve police force (crpf), border security force (bsf), indo tibetan border police (itbt), central industrial security force (cisf) and assam rifles, from the provision of ..... said section, the said provisions cannot be invoked or utilized by the petitioner for a sheltered or a sedentary job. the provisions of sections 47 and 33 of the pwd act ..... pension in the writ petition. 10. the reliance placed on a judgment of andhra pradesh in a. seshaiah vs. commandant, central industrial security force, unit hyderabad [2005 (106) flr 1156] is not helpful inasmuch as in para 12 of the judgment, the andhra pradesh high court .....

Vinai Krishna Gaur Son of Sri Kailash Nath Gaur Vs. State of U.P. and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1153

..... by the hon'ble apex court that the sanction to prosecute is necessary when act or omission for which public servant was charged had reasonable connection with discharge of his official duty. in that case complaint was against personnel of border security force alleging that illegal gratification of rs. 10,000/- was demanded from complainant and ..... protect responsible public servants against the institution of possibly vexatious criminal proceedings for offences alleged to have been committed by them while they are acting or purporting to act as public servants. the policy of the legislature is to afford adequate protection to public servants to ensure that they are not prosecuted ..... passed. tehsildar seized and auctioned scooter of respondent when he was available with scooter in tehsil office, it was held by the court that the act of tehsildar was bonafide and initiation of prosecution by respondent against tehsildar for the offence under section 379 ipc was not maintainable in absence of .....

Gorakhnath Pradhan Son of Sri Raj NaraIn Pradhan Vs. the Union of Indi ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC4204

..... to allow him to participate in commando training.3. a perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner was selected for the post of constable in indo tibetan border police force in 1995 after going through several physical tests and other formalities. after selection the petitioner was directed by the head constable to fill up a recruitment form including ..... over and explained to him by the head constable.9. the learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon a decision of this court rendered in qamrul hoda v. chief security commissioner, n.e. railway, gorakhpur (1997) 2 u.p.l.b.e.c. 1201.10. in paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit it is stated that the ..... in criminal case no. 203/92 under sections 323, 504, 427 i.p.c. read with section 13(i) of scheduled caste and scheduled tribes (atrocities) prevention act neither any process was issued nor the petitioner was ever summoned by the court nor the investigating officer came to his house in connection with investigation of the aforesaid case .....

Shio Prasad Vs. Banshi Mohan Agarwal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1578

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner is a tenant of shop, in question for the last about 15 years at the rate of Rs. 82.50P per month besides taxes. He claims that his business of manufacturing tin boxes etc., from the said shop is the sole source of livelihood.3. In 1996, S.C.C. Suit No. 39 of 1996 was instituted by the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 for a decree for ejectment of the petitioner as well as for a decree of recovery of sum of Rs. 2227.50P towards rent and damages for use and occupation of the aforesaid shop. The suit was filed with the allegation that the petitioner-tenant is in arrears of rent and also on the ground that he has sublet the shop to one Sri Munshi Lal.4. The suit was contested by the petitioner by filing written statement denying the allegations levelled in the plaint. Judge, Small Causes Court decreed the suit vide order dated 17.12.2004.5. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2004 in S.C.C. Suit No. 39 of 1996, the ...

Heera Singh S/O Dharm Dev Singh Vs. State of U.P.,

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005CriLJ3222; I(2006)DMC19

..... in the writ petition are that the petitioner was married to respondent no. 2 in 1978 and 'gauna' took place in 1982. he is an employee of boarder security force and after his 'gauna', he went to punjab in 1983 to join his duties. he came back to village in 1984 and found that his wife was in advance ..... evidence and on such vague pleadings.8. the next argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that with the advancement of science and technology, provisions of evidence act enacted more than 100 years back, when such special techniques were not in existence, have totally lost their significance, is also without substance and liable to be rejected ..... test was not even in existence. in this era of modern technology, provisions enacted more than hundred years hick have lost their significance.4. section 112 of the evidence act provides that birth of a child during continuance of a marriage is conclusive proof of his legitimacy. the said section reads as under :'section 112 - the fact that .....

Lalloo Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2752

..... right to address the court.10. the learned single judge of the punjab and haryana high court in the case of joga singh (supra) while examining rule 157 of the border security force rules, 1969, has held that right to be defended is guaranteed under article 22 of the constitution of india. in that case, the court was examining rule 157 which is ..... somewhat similar to rule 129 of the army act. it is noticeable that the learned single judge first holds 'right to be defended by a counsel is not a guaranteed right' but in the very next breath it ..... in the army was discharging the function of a havaldar (opr) in 129 ad regiment when he was charge-sheeted for two offences under section 40(c) of the army act, 1950. he was tried by a summary court martial and was awarded the following punishment :(a) to be reduced to the ranks ;(b) to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three .....

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

..... the first 12 questions detailed in part a, he would be liable to be punished, as provided in border security force act, 1968.8. section 23 of the border security force act, 1968 provides as below :'any person having become subject to this act who is discovered to have made at the time of enrolment a willfully false answer to any question set ..... it is not disputed that for giving false information in reply to the question no. 12 of the aforesaid questionnaire, the proceedings under section 23 of the border security force act had commenced. he was charged of making willful false statement to the aforesaid question and it was ultimately proved against the petitioner and the punishment in question ..... the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the border security force act, 1968.'since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under section 23 of the b.s.f. act, 1968 for giving willful false answer to the question no. 12 contained in part a of .....

State of U.P. Vs. Ajai Kumar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3926

..... dower or mehr in the case of persons to whom the muslim personal law (shariat) applies.'12. this definition makes it clear that the property or the valuable security need not be as a consideration for marriage, as was required to be in the unamended definition. this apart, the addition of words 'any time' before the expression ..... a.m. the same night in the hospital.11. it should also be taken note of that the amended definition of 'dowry' as contained in dowry prohibition act, 1961, coming into force in 1986, does not leave anything to doubt that the demand made after solemnization of marriage would be dowry. the definition as amended reads as below :'dowry ..... ' means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly--(a) by one party to a marriage to the other party to .....