Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... one mentally retarded child is with the petitioner-husband, rest of the two minor children are with the respondent-wife. the petitioner-husband hitherto was serving in the border security force. he has agricultural land from which also, he has earnings. claiming the income of husband from all sources to be rs.50,000/- per month, including ..... proceedings.4. without denying about the existence of agricultural holding and income emerging therefrom, the husband has claimed that he has taken voluntary retirement from the border security force and is getting only rs.10,116/- per month as pension and is also to maintain his minor son and old mother.5. after taking into ..... passed by the district judge, shaheed bhagat singh nagar whereby deciding application under section 24 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the act) in the main petition under section 13 of the act preferred by the husband, interalia maintenance of rs.6,000/- per month has been fixed for the respondent-wife .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... certificate no.30 of 2013 was issued and the recovery officer has proceeded to issue proclamation of sale dated march 31, 2014. the courts below were wrong in acting under sarfaesi act, 2002 to oust jurisdiction of the suit and, therefore, the application for temporary injunction was dismissed. mittal manju 2014.05.22 11:16 i attest to ..... and consequently, the application by the bank for transfer of said suit to the tribunal was not maintainable. in the present case, the property has been mortgaged as security for loan and, therefore, the judgment relied upon is of no help to the petitioner. in the result, no merit is found in this petition which is ..... action has not been taken by the bank under the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002. on the other hand, the defendant bank has taken recours.to proceedings under the debts recovery act, 1993 for which it filed original application no.152 of 2010 before the learned drt. that is how .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... under mangu ram, father of defendant no.2. mangu ram had filed an ejectment petition against amir singh, father of the plaintiffs as per provisions of punjab security of land tenures act, 1953, which was allowed and ejectment order was passed on 16.05.1984. against that, amir singh had filed appeal and thereafter revision, which were dismissed ..... 2, was owner of land measuring 75 kanals and he had filed an ejectment application against amir singh, father of the plaintiffs, as per provisions of punjab security of land tenures act, 1953, which was allowed on 16.05.1988. against that, an appeal was preferred by amar singh, father of the plaintiffs, which was dismissed on ..... 2005. however, defendant no.2 never issued any notice to the plaintiffs, regarding his intention to sell the land in dispute as per the punjab pre-emption act and the sale was carried out secretly. it was further averred that the entire land in dispute measuring 75 kanals is being cultivated by the plaintiffs, their brothers .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... section 319 of the code. after securing presence of accused hardip singh, fresh charge was framed against all the accused for the aforesaid offences to which they did not plead guilty and claimed trial. to ..... her examination in the court creates a doubt about her credibility and veracity. another submission made by counsel is that if amrik singh was carrying a pistol and forced the prosecutrix to sit on his motor cycle by pointing a pistol towards her brother, there was no reason for amrik singh to seek assistance of avtar singh ..... commission of offence punishable under sections 363, 366, 376 (2)(g).342, 506 ipc and amrik singh was also charged for offence under section 25 of the arms act to which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. however, after leading some evidence before the trial court, hardip singh accused was summoned to face trial under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... mental or physical) or her harassment with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security; or abetment within the meaning of section 107, ipc, have been established, rather, to the contrary, the allegations are general and vague in nature. learned ..... court examined different shades of the meaning of "instigation'' and observed that instigation . is to goad, urge, forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do "an act". to satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect, but what constitutes instigation must necessarily and specifically be ..... to prove that the accused subjected the deceased with cruelty and harassment and such cruelty and harassment drove her to commit suicide. section 113-a, evidence act does not create an offence or make it punishable. it only deals with presumption which the court may draw in a particular fact situation as contemplated under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... of poppy husk alongwith one bag of ganja were recovered from them in their presence, which was denied by them. therefore, this contention is also without any force. in view of the forgoing discussion, we are of the view that from the testimony of the investigating officer inspector jaipal singh, s.i.padam singh and ..... but nothing could be recovered. on the completion of the investigation, the challan was presented in the court. accused were chargesheeted under sections 15 and 20 of the ndps act, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. to prove its case, prosecution examined e/asi om parkash (pw1).bhupinder sharma (pw2).hc joginder singh ( ..... 13.3.2009, passed by learned special judge, ambala, vide which they were convicted under sections 15 and 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short 'the ndps act') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 12 years and fine of ` 1 lac each, in default thereof, further rigorous imprisonment for 3 years .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the course of trial are that initially tejinder singh @ billu was abducted on 14.5.1993 and illegally detained by appellant preetpal singh virk and other members of police force. he was released from illegal detention on 8.6.1993. tejinder singh, then went to kolkata to reside with his brother jagrup singh, to avoid harassment of police. ..... act and tada act. police used to raid the house of jagdeep @ pilli in order to search him and, therefore, the entire family was inimical towards the police.3. the facts ..... by the applicant- appellants was that jagdeep singh @ pilli brother of tejinder singh was associated with terrorist activities. jagdeep singh was an active member of khalisthan liberation force (klf). fir no.198 dated 27.8.1990, police station sunam was registered against jagdeep singh @ pilli under section 302/34 ipc, section 25 of the arms .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... ` 50,00,000/- was paid to the complainant on various occasions while raising the loan. the cheques in question were issued in discharge of legal liability i.e.as security for the payment of the amount of ` 50,00,000/-. so, the petitioner is entitled to concession of anticipatory bail. i have carefully considered the said submission but ..... do not find any force in the said submission. in fact civil suit has been withdrawn by the parties but there is nothing on the file that petitioner alongwith others agreed to pay ` 50 ..... the loan and that cheques have been used for filing of complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. during the investigation, it is revealed that cheques have been misused and complaint under section 138 of the n.i.act has been filed against the complainant. manoj kumar 2013.10.04 10:56 i attest to the accuracy .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... of construction over the land abutting an ammunition depot are imposed in the interest of 'general public'. 12]. amritsar district comprises border area. the strategic location of ammunition depot is essentially in the interest of security of the nation. such like locations need to kumar mohinder 2013.10.03 11:51 i attest to the accuracy of ..... others, 2009 (4) rcr (civil 487 holding as follows:- our conclusions are as under:- (i) notification under section 3 read with section 7 (b) comes into force forthwith and is conclusive proof of necessity to keep the law free from buildings and other obstructions. (ii) absence of taking of steps for making of award does not ..... apparent reasons. 6]. owing to some of the re-furbished plea(s) taken by the petitioners, especially their attack on the constitutionality of related provisions of 1903 act, we have heard learned counsel for the parties at some fair length and perused the record with their able assistance. 7]. we firstly propose to deal with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... on their respective bicycles. fir no.111 was registered in police station qila lal singh, district batala under section 304-a ipc against the driver of the vehicle owned by border security force. lal singh was challaned for causing this accident, as stated by learned counsel for the appellant.3. widow aged 31 years and five children of kashmir singh filed claim application ..... under section 166 of the motor vehicles act before the tribunal. sanjay 2013.09.14 12:37 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab and haryana high court fao no.2521 of 2007 (2 .....
Tag this Judgment!