Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... . undisputedly, both the parties had business dealings with each other with regard to handlooms.it has come on record that the accused had issued cheque no.476844 as security cheque to the complainant which he presented for encashment by filling an amount of rs.2,00,000/- as part payment towards bill no.248 dated 25/09/1995 ..... cheque no.47844 dated 26/09/1995 whereas the disputed blank cheque which was handed over to the complainant as crl. appeal no.1772-sb of 2002 [ 4 ].security cheque bore no.476844. he further stated that the complainant has miserably failed to prove as to whether the cheque in question was issued to him towards part payment ..... evidence brought on record, it is amply clear that the blank cheque was handed over to the complainant as a security cheque and was not meant for enforcement of a debt. the object of section 138 of the act is to avoid malignant trade practice of indiscriminately issuing cheques without sufficient funds. the facts and circumstances of the present .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... reported in the digest ?.no.---- k.kannan, j. (oral) 1. the writ petition challenges the order passed by the authorities constituted under the punjab security of land tenures act. the petition was at the instance of sohan singh whose holding was declared to be in excess of the ceiling area and declaration was kumar sanjeev 2014 ..... third objection was that the property owned by the landowner was situated in two districts and consequently, in terms of rule 4(b) issued under the punjab security of land tenures rules, 1956, the jurisdiction vested only with the special collector and the decision taken by the collector was without jurisdiction. 3. all the objections ..... commissioner, it should have been simply possible for the financial commissioner to close proceedings and thwart any attempt on his part to seek for a recomputation and secure to himself the benefit of making fresh list of property which he wanted to hold and declare the property which he wanted to surrender surplus. the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... confirmed in favour of m/s. ludhiana mediways-respondent no.2, the auction purchaser under the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 (in short 'the sarfaesi act'). cwp no.14741 of 2012 has been filed by the brother of petitioner no.2 in the main case who is a guarantor and had ..... keen for taking the possession of this hospital and such was the influence that the bank has arranged the orders from the district magistrate along with full police force to take possession of running hospital within 3-4 days, whereas there are number of cases pending before the same district magistrate which are lingering on for ..... the bank had received 25% but it did not wait for the verdict of the case in handing over the possession taken with the strength of the police force provided by the district magistrate and now the auction purchases were pretending to be the bona fide purchasers though they were well aware of the pending litigation. however .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... penal code. both the suggestions were denied by him. it was also put to him that the police favoured him because he was an employee of the boarder security force, which was also denied. he was asked about the affidavits sworn by the parents of the appellant, to which he replied that it was correct that such affidavits ..... 01.2014 passed by the learned additional district judge, kurukshetra, vide which the petition filed by respondent no.1 (husband) under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (act for short) was allowed. the appellant wife came up in appeal assailing the judgment on the ground that respondent no.1 had deserted her and even neglected ..... of cruelty?. opp2 whether the petition is not maintainable?. opr3 whether the petitioner (now respondent no.1) is estopped from filing the present petition by his own act and conduct?. opr4 relief. learned counsel for the appellant argued that the trial court wrongly held that the appellant was living in adultery with sahab singh because it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... widows or parents or children of the soldiers killed n the chinese aggression of 1962 and pakistan aggression of 1965 and widows of the personnel of the armed forces, border security force and punjab armed police killed in the indo-pakistan conflict of 1971, shall be entitled to the allotment on payment of the cultivable land as far as ..... to the enjoyment of such absolute estate is void and unenforceable. in the case of manohar's case (supra).while interpreting section 10 of the transfer of property act, it was held that sale deed including clauses prohibiting sale to some one outside family was void. moreover, the plaintiff himself cannot take the plea that he ..... rule 4 (1) of part ii of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) rules, 1976 ( framed under section 18 of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) act, 1976, the widows of disabled soldiers etc.killed in chinese aggression of 1962 were entitled for allotment of land up to limit of 10 ordinary acres of cultivable land @ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... widows or parents or children of the soldiers killed n the chinese aggression of 1962 and pakistan aggression of 1965 and widows of the personnel of the armed forces, border security force and punjab armed police killed in the indo-pakistan conflict of 1971, shall be entitled to the allotment on payment of the cultivable land as far as ..... to the enjoyment of such absolute estate is void and unenforceable. in the case of manohar's case (supra).while interpreting section 10 of the transfer of property act, it was held that sale deed including clauses prohibiting sale to some one outside family was void. moreover, the plaintiff himself cannot take the plea that he ..... rule 4 (1) of part ii of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) rules, 1976 ( framed under section 18 of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) act, 1976, the widows of disabled soldiers etc.killed in chinese aggression of 1962 were entitled for allotment of land up to limit of 10 ordinary acres of cultivable land @ .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... widows or parents or children of the soldiers killed n the chinese aggression of 1962 and pakistan aggression of 1965 and widows of the personnel of the armed forces, border security force and punjab armed police killed in the indo-pakistan conflict of 1971, shall be entitled to the allotment kumar parveen 2014.07.15 14:35 i attest ..... the enjoyment of such absolute estate is void and unenforceable. in the case of manohar's case (supra).while interpreting section 10 of the transfer of property act, it was held that sale deed including clauses prohibiting sale to some one outside family was void. moreover, the plaintiff himself cannot take the plea that he ..... and integrity of this document cwp no.10518 of 1994 7 properties (disposal) rules, 1976 ( framed under section 18 of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) act, 1976, the widows of disabled soldiers etc.killed in chinese aggression of 1962 were entitled for allotment of land up to limit of 10 ordinary acres of cultivable land .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... or parents or children of the soldiers killed n the chinese aggression of 1962 and pakistan aggression of 1965 and widows of the personnel of the armed forces, border security force and punjab armed police killed in the indo-pakistan conflict of 1971, shall be entitled to the allotment on payment of the cultivable land as far as ..... 4 (1) of part ii of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) rules, 1976 ( framed under section 18 of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) act, 1976, the widows of disabled soldiers etc.killed in chinese aggression of 1962 were entitled for allotment of land up to limit of 10 ordinary acres of cultivable land ..... of this document cwp no.14051 of 1993 5 before proceeding further, it would be appropriate to reproduce sections 10 and 11 of the transfer of property act: 10. condition restraining alienation.--where property is transferred subject to a condition or limitation absolutely restraining the transferee or any person claiming under him from parting .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... or parents or children of the soldiers killed n the chinese aggression of 1962 and pakistan aggression of 1965 and widows of the personnel of the armed forces, border security force and punjab armed police killed in the indo-pakistan conflict of 1971, shall be entitled to the allotment on payment of the cultivable land as far as ..... 4 (1) of part ii of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) rules, 1976 ( framed under section 18 of the punjab package deal properties (disposal) act, 1976, the widows of disabled soldiers etc.killed in chinese aggression of 1962 were entitled for allotment of land up to limit of 10 ordinary acres of cultivable land ..... of this document cwp no.14037 of 1993 5 before proceeding further, it would be appropriate to reproduce sections 10 and 11 of the transfer of property act: 10. condition restraining alienation.--where property is transferred subject to a condition or limitation absolutely restraining the transferee or any person claiming under him from parting .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... -state. mr.ramesh chand sharma, advocate for the complainant. mehinder singh sullar, j.(oral) petitioner ajay pal son of harbhajan singh, deputy commandant (intelligence) with border security force (bsf), claiming himself to be the recommendee for president police medal for gallantry award, has preferred the instant petition for the grant of concession of anticipatory bail, ..... the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crm no.m-34081 of 2012 3 20, 22 and 23 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, containing similar allegations, is also pending in the court of jmic. the complainant is an advocate by profession. therefore, false implication of petitioner by ..... . the petitioner has already filed a petition (annexure p3) for divorce against the complainant for dissolution of their marriage u/s 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955. the other complaint filed by the complainant against the petitioner and his parents & sister u/ss 12, 18, 19, arvind kumar sharma 2014. .....
Tag this Judgment!