Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 84 challenge Court: punjab and haryana Page 3 of about 929 results (0.148 seconds)

Sri Guru Ram Das Charitable Hospital Trust and ors. Vs. State of Punja ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2004)136PLR99

..... any. ix)children of november, 1984 riot affecteddisplaced persons, children of the innocent civilians killed or 100% disabledin terrorist violence or during operation by the security forces acting inaid of civil power.1%59. the total of these reservation came to 40%. thereafter, 15% seats had been reserved for the all india quota ..... state quota for the categories noted below belonging the state of punjab and to the extent mentioned against each. i)sc/st25%ii)backward classes5%iii)border area/backward area (1% each)2%iv)sportsperson1%v)children/grand children of freedomfigthers1%vi)disabled persons1%a) blindness or low vision1% b) hearing ..... of gallantry awardees. c) children of the serving defencepersonnel and ex-servicemen: viii)a. children/wards of officers and jawansof punjab police, pap and paramilitary forces.precedence sub category wiseshall be as under:1%a) winners of president police medal forgallantry, including posthumous awardees. b) winners of police medal for gallantryconferred .....

Present: Dr. Amarpreet Sandhu Advocate Vs. Sukhwinder Kaur Alias Sukho ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... on their respective bicycles. fir no.111 was registered in police station qila lal singh, district batala under section 304-a ipc against the driver of the vehicle owned by border security force. lal singh was challaned for causing this accident, as stated by learned counsel for the appellant.3. widow aged 31 years and five children of kashmir singh filed claim application ..... under section 166 of the motor vehicles act before the tribunal. sanjay 2013.09.14 12:37 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document punjab and haryana high court fao no.2521 of 2007 (2 .....

Budh Singh Vs. Land Acquisition Collector and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)104PLR664

..... taken into possession forcibly by the punjab armed police in march, 1963. after some time, possession was handed over to the border security force. on 30.5.1965, notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act (briefly 'the act') for acquisition of this land was issued. pala singh filed suit for possession of land which was taken forcibly by armed ..... that this revision petition deserves to succeed. as already noticed, pala singh was dispossessed in march, 1963. subsequent to his dispossession, notification under section 4 of the act was issued in may, 1965, which led to the filing of the suit for possession suit in favour of pala singh was decreed and a finding was recorded therein ..... by the trial court on 29-8-1984. in the meanwhile, i.e. on 16.11.1984, another notification was issued under sections 4 and 6 of the act for acquisition of this land. the order of the trial court, refusing to grant injunction was challenged in appeal. appeal was dismissed and the matter was brought to .....

Assistant Collector Customs Vs. Amrik Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... act, 1962 ( in short the act).3. the facts of the prosecution case , in brief, are that on 4- 5.1992 the officials of directorate of revenue intelligence (regional unit) amritsar, comprising of s.k.luthra, senior intelligence officer, buta singh, harpal singh, v..k.sharma, all intelligence officers, r.k.saini, stenot rajbal singh sepoy, kashmir singh along with border security force ..... the judgment of the trial court.15. i have carefully considered the said submission made by the counsel for custom but do not find any force in that submission.16. the trial court has given a detailed reasoning for acquitting amrik singh and balwinder singh in paragraph no.11 of its judgment ..... , in all 728 gold biscuits valued at rs.3,65,00,464/- were recovered and the same were seized under section 110 of the customs act, 1962 in consequence of failure of ajit pal singh sethi and daljit singh to produce any documentary evidence regarding their lawful importation acquisition/possession/transportation. the .....

Piara and Etc. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2009CriLJ501

..... act, which read as under:42. power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorization - (1) any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force ..... cogent, convincing, reliable, and trustworthy evidence, it is proved, that none tampered with the sample parcels, and the case property throughout, then the court cannot act on mere conjectures and surmises or farfetched possibilities, that the sample parcels, might have been tampered with. in piara singh v. the state of punjab , ..... 3. on appearance, in the court, the copies of documents, relied upon by the prosecution, were supplied to the accused. charge under section 15 of the act, was framed against them, to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed judicial trial.4. thereafter, darbara ram, accused, absconded, and could not be arrested. .....

Jagdish and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR205

..... act, which reads as under:42. power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorization.-(1) any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force ..... held above, as to under what circumstances, the investigating officer was unable to comply with the provisions of section 42(1) and 42(2) of the act strictly. however, he made substantial compliance thereof, by sending the ruqa embodying therein, the secret information, after the recovery of the contraband, from the accused. ..... absconding and the very purpose of the raid would have been defeated. however, he made a substantial compliance of the provisions of section 42 of the act, by recording a ruqa, embodying the secret information therein, though sent the same to the officer superior lateron. since, there was substantial compliance, with .....

Hardev Singh Vs. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intellig ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... officer v. balwinder singh and others', under sections 21/23/25/27a/28/29/60 of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985, vide dri f.no.855(2) asr/2011. brief allegations are that, petitioner was employed in border security force as generator operator. he in connivance with co-accused facilitated the smuggling of 75 kgs of heroin on 06.04.2011 seized ..... not m-4583 o 2. integrity of this document june, 2010 to april, 2011. the statement of petitioner-accused was recorded on 05.05.2011 under section 67 of the ndps act by the empowered officer in which he admitted his role in the smuggling of 75 kgs of heroin, one pistol and twelve live cartridges seized on 06.04.2011 and .....

Bhai Sher Jang Singh and anr. Vs. Virinder Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1979CriLJ493

..... arose out of the allegations that the three deceased persons had been abducted from the crystal chowk, amritsar, tortured and murdered in collusion with members of the border security force but the case ended up acquittal by the supreme court of india. it is claimed that the respondent eluded her husband for six hours on may 7, ..... of stridhan had become wholly obsolete. we have carefully considered these ingenuous arguments advanced by mr. thapar. the two statutes, namely, the hindu marriage act and the hindu succession act have only partially modified the principles of hindu law, and no provision contained in either of these statutes has either expressly or by implication in any ..... huge sums of money in consideration for the marriage. the term 'dowry' has been defined in section 2 of this act as under:definition of 'dowry': in this act, dowry' means any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly(a) by one party to a marriage to the other party .....

Gurdev Kaur Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3016

..... act have to be noticed in extenso. it reads as under:--42. power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation.--(1) any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the boarder security force ..... & h) (supra), the facts were that on 2-2-1998, the inspector, cia, bhiwani had received a secret information that accused was coming from rajasthan border with the opium. thereafter he held a nakabandi and apprehended the accused along with the rajesh and searched the accused which led to the recovery of a kgs. ..... short ground that there was violation of subsection (2) of section 42 of the act admittedly, for the reason that the secret information said to have been received by pw-2 that the accused was coming from rajasthan border with opium was not reduced in writing and the same was not sent to the .....

Whether Respondent (Now Appellant) Developed Sexual Vs. Jasvinder Sing ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... penal code. both the suggestions were denied by him. it was also put to him that the police favoured him because he was an employee of the boarder security force, which was also denied. he was asked about the affidavits sworn by the parents of the appellant, to which he replied that it was correct that such affidavits ..... 01.2014 passed by the learned additional district judge, kurukshetra, vide which the petition filed by respondent no.1 (husband) under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (act for short) was allowed. the appellant wife came up in appeal assailing the judgment on the ground that respondent no.1 had deserted her and even neglected ..... of cruelty?. opp2 whether the petition is not maintainable?. opr3 whether the petitioner (now respondent no.1) is estopped from filing the present petition by his own act and conduct?. opr4 relief. learned counsel for the appellant argued that the trial court wrongly held that the appellant was living in adultery with sahab singh because it .....