Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 83 law officer Page 18 of about 48,222 results (1.102 seconds)

S.S. Khanna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... bsf (assistant commandants) recruitment rules, 1985, issued in exercise of powers conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 141 of the border security force act, 1968. the method of recruitment to the post assistant commandant is provided under rules 3 and 4 and the details thereof have been described in the schedule ..... qualification has been provided. but the candidate must pass matriculation or higher secondary examination passed or an equivalent of a recognized board of education/university or border security force certificate of education class-i. to be qualified for promotion, it is aho one of the conditions that a candidate should have five years experience ..... solicitor general of india.3. in nut shell, the case of the petitioner as projected in this writ petition is that he was appointed as constable under border security force (for short 'bsf') in the year, 1968 and during the course of his service period in consideration of satisfactory service, he was promoted upto the .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sukraj Debbarama

Court : Guwahati

..... the respondent herein to dismissal from service. the sentence was promulgated on 15.5.2000. in terms of the provisions of section 117 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter abbreviated as the bsf act, 1968), the petitioner-respondent made a representation against the said finding and sentence, but the same was turned down by the order, dated 20.7 ..... and the same ought not to have been interfered with. this apart, submits learned senior central government standing counsel, the respondent was a member of border security force, which is a para-military force requiring a very high degree of discipline and in such an organisation, the assault on a superior officer who was three grade senior to the respondent, ..... i.a. ansari, j.1. the respondent herein, while working as a l/nk in the border security force, faced a trial by summary security force court (hereinafter referred to as 'the ssfc') on two charges and was found guilty of one of those two charges framed against him and the .....

Rakesh Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT663

..... petitioner is serving as commandant in the border security force. he is facing trial by the general, security force hereinafter referred to as gsfc for disobedience of lawful command given to him, malingering and for making false allegations against his superiors punishable under sections 21(2), 24(b) and 35(a) of the bsf act, 1968. the charges framed against the ..... kumar ghosh, dig, sts bangalore as pw-1, sh. mohan lal verma, dig (coord) fhq as pw-2, sh. r.p. singh, inspector general, ig (adm) force head quarters, border security force, new delhi as pw-3, sh. m.s. sharma, commandant 195, batallion, bsf as pw-4, dr. h.s. shekhawat, cmo(sg), 128 batallion, bsf as pw ..... of overall mechanism by which the military discipline is preserved. it is for the special need for the armed forces that a person subject to army act is tried by court-martial for an act which is an offence under the act. court-martial discharges judicial function and to a great extent is a court where provisions of evidence .....

Agya Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... by the respondents. they are left free to take a decision. this petition would be treated as a statutory appeal in terms of section 117a of the border security force act read with section 168 of the border security force act. let a decision be taken within a period of four months from the date, a copy of the order passed by this court is made available by ..... . after more than 30 days of absence of the petitioner, a one man court of inquiry was ordered on 29th may' 99 under section 62 of the border security force act (here-in-after referred to as the act). after completion of the court of inquiry, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner through registered letter dt. 2nd july' 99, at his home ..... nirmal singh, j.1. the facts in brief be noticed as under:petitioner was enrolled in border security force on 15th june' 91, as a cook. after completion of training, he was remustered as constable (gd) on 30th may' 95. he proceeded on one day's casual leave on .....

Dwarika Nath Mishra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ95

..... , however, stood rejected without giving him an opportunity of being heard. again he made another representation to the ministry of home affairs, directorate general border security force, personnel directorate establishment section, new delhi, requesting for his re-instatement in explaining his miserable condition and deplorable circumstances of his family. when his ..... reiterated by the respondents that the continued overstayal without justification and ignoring the proposed action resulted in order of dismissal in accordance with the bsf act and the rules framed thereunder.9. i have heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties in extenso and also gone through the record meticulously ..... however, did not respond to the reminders including the warning letters and ultimately the court of inquiry was ordered under section 62 of the bsf act on the completion of 30 days' absence. further submission of the respondents is that a show-cause notice, for proposed termination of his service .....

Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the orders are liable to be set aside.32. the contention of the respondent on the other hand is that there is no requirement under provisions of the border security force act and rules thereunder for the ssfc to give reasons while giving findings of guilty or not guilty and that reasons are also not required to be given under ..... (2010) 3 ssc161 in that case several appeals had been filed by the union of india and the main contesting respondent in all those appeals were members of border security force. the respondents had succeeded before the high court which took the view that the orders passed by ssfc and the appellate authority were bad and illegal as there ..... ble ms. justice gita mittal hon'ble ms. justice deepa sharma deepa sharma, j.1. the petitioner in this case was enrolled as a constable no.860020697 in border security force (hereinafter referred to as bsf ) on 10.07.1968 and after completion of his training course he was attached with 09 battalion of bsf artillery battalion of 1011 .....

Sripurna Chandra Nahak. Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... on the part of the opp. parties in not considering his case for grant of minimum pension despite the fact that the petitioner has completed 16 years of service in border security force (hereinafter referred to as 'the b.s.f.') and, thereafter, he has been dismissed from service on the ground of unauthorized absence for a period of 5 (five ..... to xi of the rules framed under section 141 of the said act. the apex court observed that the b.s.f. act has been enacted with a view to provide for the constitution and regulation of an armed force of the union for ensuring the security of the borders of india and for matters connected therewith by the parliament and the ..... same has been enforced by notification with effect from 20.2.1969. the supreme court quoting section 11 and referring to other provisions of the b.s.f. act held as follows:-"we .....

Nema Singh Otti vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... court, an order dated 23.03.2012 was passed by the respondents terminating his services by passing a dismissal under section 10 of border security force act, 1968, read with rule 23 (a) of the border security force rules, 1969. after being acquitted, the w.p.(c) 463/2017 page 2 of 6 petitioner submitted a representation dated 02.05 ..... filed the present petition aggrieved by the order dated 22.01.2016, informing him that his case for promotion to the rank of deputy commandant in the border security force(hereinafter referred to as bsf) by way of relaxation in qualifying mandatory command and logistic course had been examined by the competent authority and was rejected. ..... and one chamanlal under section 21, 25, 61 & 85 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances (ndps) act and under section 489 (c) of ipc, for their alleged involvement in smuggling of four kg of narcotics from the border outpost at jammu & kashmir. after conclusion of trial, vide judgment dated 05.11.2011 the learned .....

Dipak Kumar Chakraborty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... b.k. sharma, j.1. the petitioner who is a retired commandant of border security force (b.s.f.) has assailed the legality and validity of the order of penalty passed against him and subsequent denial of promotion to the rank of addl. deputy inspector general, ..... under the respondents, i.e., the b.s.f., as commandant was taken up for proceeding under general security force court (g.s.f.c.) on the following charges:'1st charge, bsf act, 1968 section 40:an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force:in that he, at shq n & m while performing the duties of presiding officer for the recruitment test ..... ) of section 48 may be referred to which prescribe forfeiture of seniority and severe reprimand. section 50 speaks of combination of punishments. thus from the above provisions of the bsf act, it cannot be said that the petitioner has been imposed with impermissible punishments leading to double jeopardy.21. from the aforesaid provisions it will also be seen that the penalties .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devi Lal Sahu

Court : Rajasthan

..... leave and over staying on leave. the writ-petitioner submitted that on 28.10.2003, he was served with a charge-sheet under section 26 of the border security force act, 1968 ('the bsf act') and was placed under close arrest at headquarter 20 bn. barmer on 29.10.2003; and that the assistant commandant proceeded with the record of evidence ..... trial was held in a casual manner where the presiding officer, of his own, held that he had pleaded guilty and that rule 142(2) of the border security forces rules, 1969 ('the bsf rules') was complied with and proceeded to convict and sentence him with dismissal from service; and the said order dated 10.11.2003 ..... background aspects of the matter could be taken in comprehension thus: the respondent herein filed the writ petition aforesaid with the averments, inter alia, that he joined the border security force ('bsf') on 05.09.1986; that he had been serving with sincerity and dedication and had received certain rewards too; and that he had, of course, been .....