Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 83 law officer Page 14 of about 48,222 results (1.865 seconds)

Nov 08 2001 (HC)

Balganad Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 97(2002)DLT45; 2003(1)SLJ71(Delhi)

..... as 'friend of accused' inorder to assist the petitioner. 10. on 12th august, 1996, the petitioner wastried by the summary security force court in strictcompliance of all the procedural requirementsprovided under the bsf act and rules. during thecourse of the aforesaid trial, the charges framedagainst the petitioner were read over and explainedto him in hindi in ..... and ors. ; inc.w.p. no. 4687/2001 disposed of on 4th september,2001. 13. in view of the records of the proceedingsof the summary security force court, the contentionof the petitioner that he did not plead guilty isalso without any merit. in that view of thematter, i find no merit in this petition ..... , i proceedto dispose of this writ petition. 7. the records read with the statements madein the counter affidavit indicate that the petitioner was recruited in the border securityforce on 23rd june, 1990 and thereafter he wasdismissed from service in the year 1996. the petitioner had thus rendered about six years ofservice. the service .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2011 (HC)

Lavito Sema Vs. Union of India

Court : Guwahati

..... made by the petitioner is the order dated 6.7.09 (annexure-xxxi), by which the govt. of india in the ministry of home affairs, directorate general, border security force has rejected the petition submitted by the petitioner against the aforesaid orders. the orders so passed is pursuant to the order of this court dated 9.3.2009 passed in ..... petition was disposed of by order dated 9.3.09 with the direction to dispose of the petition submitted by the petitioner under section 117(2) of the bsf act, 1968. the said petition having been rejected by the aforementioned annexure-xxxi order dated 6.7.09, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition, challenging all ..... the requisite intension / knowledge as envisaged in sec 300 ipc, the court was inclined to believe that being a trained and experienced force personnel, proficient in handling the fire arms and knowledge of the act of firing at the victim from such a close range was sufficient to cause his death in normal course of nature, must be .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2012 (HC)

Devender Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... guilty and to direct the respondents to reduce the punishment from dismissal to any other punishment as per the provision of the bsf act. 2. brief facts to comprehend the disputes are that the petitioner had joined the border security force as a constable in august, 1990. subsequently, he was made to work as a constable driver at 151st bn shq siliguri. ..... the constitution of india was clearly impermissible. 22. the object and intent of section 75 which has been incorporated in the bsf act is clearly to prohibit a second trial of the accused, whether by the security force court or by a criminal court, in all cases where the accused has been convicted or acquitted of an offence by a ..... 55 he shall not be liable to be tried again for the same offence by a security force court or dealt with under the said sections. (2) when any person, subject to this act, has been acquitted or convicted of an offence by a security force court or has been dealt with under section 53 or section 55, he shall not be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1987 (HC)

Kedar Nath Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN746

..... terms and conditions specified therein. the terms of appointment was mentioned specifically that his temporary appointment was governed by the crp force act and rules or such other act and or rules for the border security force as may be prescribed by the government and the manual as amended from time to time. the petitioner was required to communicate ..... 1967 and ex r/4 dated june 30, 1968. it was mentioned therein that they would be governed by the crp force act and rules and such other act and or rules for the border security force as may be prescribed by the government from time to time it was also mentioned that the manner of fixation of their ..... from december 9, 1969 treating december 9. 1966 as the date of commencement of his probation under rule 10 of the border security force rules, 1969. the border security force rules, 1959 were obviously framed and brought into force after creation of some permanent post for the first time with effect from april 1, 1969. it is difficult to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1992 (HC)

Samir Bhattacharya and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT333(HC)

..... the writ petitioners who joined west bengal home guard service do not come under the purview of the border security force act and rules and their grievances are matters concerning the state government alone. it is further stated that the border wing home guard (bwhg) personnel attached with the b.s.f. personnel are only under the ..... above all no fixed length of service nor pension or retiring benefits. there is no messing system and they take meals at the border security force messes on individual payment. though the border security forces got border allowances but the petitioners are deprived of the same and only get the house rent allowance. their further grievance is that as members ..... thereof that the expenditure incurred on the deployment of home guards would be debitable to the major head 255-police-a.2-borde.r security force- a.2(l)-directorate general of border security force-a.2(l) (19) other charges under demand no. 52-police during the year 1976-77, subject to funds being voted by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2012 (HC)

Pankaj Negi Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

..... only records that the roe be prepared and is signed by the commandant. according to the learned counsel for the petitioner rule 45 of the border security force rules, 1969 contemplates that the charge will be heard by the commandant and thereafter, the charge and statements of the witnesses should be read over ..... reinstatement with full back wages and all consequential reliefs. 2. brief relevant facts to comprehend the dispute are that the petitioner was enrolled with the border security force at bsf stc bangalore and after his enrollment he completed his basic training. thereafter, he was posted to the unit on 18th february, 1994. the ..... border. the charged officer had pleaded not guilty and thereafter, the record of evidence was ordered to be prepared to the two charges which were framed against him. on the basis of record of evidence, the competent authority had passed an order for trial of the accused constable by summary security force court on a charge under section 40 of the bsf act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2017 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Vs. Union of India Through the Home Secretary Department o ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... year 2006 the rules for technical cadre came into existence which is known as border security force motor transport workshop (non gazetted) group c posts recruitment rules, 2006 (for short hereinafter referred to as the rules, 2006 ) enacted under the border security force act, 1968. as per this rule cut off date was 21st september, 2006. ..... dated 9th january, 2001 (annexure 2 to the memo of this letters patent appeal) he was appointed as a constable in border security force. there are varieties of constables in the border security force for which the qualifications are also different, but, the facts remains that appointment on a technical post is altogether different. it ..... mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) this appellant is original petitioner who applied for the post of constable (general duty) in the border security force in pursuance of the public advertisement dated 2 nd october, 2000 as he was certificate holder of industrial training institute (iti). he was also doing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2002 (HC)

B.S. Naruka and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(67)DRJ618

..... a gradiation list of sis (pi comdrs.) approved for inclusion in list 'e'shall be maintained at the hqrs. of the bsf.' border security force act, however, was passed by the parliament in1968. section 141 of the border security force act, 1968 (in short the 'bsfact, 1968) provides : '141. power to make rules : (1) the central government may, by ..... notification, make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this act. (2) in particular and without prejudice to the ..... validity of anything previously done under that rule. 4. section 142 provides that the border security force in existence at the commencement thereof would be deemed to be the force constituted under the act and the members of the said force would be deemed to have been appointed or enrolled as such there under.5. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 2017 (HC)

Puran Chand Arya vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... us any longer.29. the respondents have also made a complaint that the said jawan had indulged in several other acts of indiscipline. inasmuch as these acts are the subject matter of consideration by the respondents in accordance with the provisions of the border security force act, we are not required to go into the matter. we refrain from commenting thereon.30. we note that it ..... . versus union of india & ors. .....respondents through : mr. sanjay jain, asg with mr. gaurang kanth, adv. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble ms. justice anu malhotra judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice1 this writ petition against the entire border security force and authorities, purporting to be in public interest, is premised on the unsubstantiated, bald statements in a video which went .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1988 (HC)

Border Security Force (B.S.F.), Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya and o ...

Court : Guwahati

..... and control of the force in the central government. as the concerned ..... the b.s.f. is an armed force of the union. this is apparent from the provisions of the border security force act, 1968, section 4(1) of which dealing with the constitution of the force states that '(t) here shall be an armed force of the union called the border security force for ensuring the security of the borders of india'. section 4 of the act has vested the general superintendence, direction .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //