Court : Jharkhand
..... holding that the respondent ought to have been given alternative employment. the learned assistant solicitor general of india further submitted that the border security force has been exempted from the applicability of the disabilities act, 1995 for which notification dated 10.09.2002 was issued however, it was not kept in view by the writ court ..... protection under section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995 and this question was answered in favour of the respondentsb.s.f. in the ..... and it is thus, submitted that since the border security force is exempted from the purview of section 47 of the disabilities act, 1995, the respondent cannot claim .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . vide letter dated 18.03.2009 secretary, housing board requested the deputy commissioner, in view of the disturbances being created in the land, to provide security to the petitioner. vide letter dated 03.08.2011, the petitioner has been communicated that agreement dated 18.07.2007 has been cancelled and it was ..... question was under encroachment. the respondent housing board vide letter dated 17 07.03.2011 requested the deputy commissioner, ranchi to depute magistrate with sufficient police force for removing the encroachment. however, the encroachment was not removed and therefore, the petitioner again requested the housing board vide letter dated 12.07.2011 ..... involving expenditure exceeding rs. 200 lakhs shall not be accorded without prior approval of the state government. the control of the government as envisaged under the act includes restraint, check etc. by the government and if prior approval of the state government was not taken by the board for executing schemes and entering .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... tax amount comes to rs. 3.05 crores instead of rs. 4.46 crores approximately and when during his statement recorded under section 14 of the central excise act, 1944, as stated herein above, while replying the question no. 12 categorically has stated that he shall give detail calculation later on, upon conjoint reading of answer ..... of the said decision. on the basis of the aforesaid decisions, it is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that unless the proceeding under section 73 of the act is completed recovery notice under section 87 issued by the respondents, dated 11.08.2014 (annexure5) could not have been issued by the respondents and hence, also ..... 1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(t) no. 5520 of 2014 ------- m/s exman security services pvt. ltd., a private limited company duly incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956, having its office at 14/482, manfit market, p.o. & p.s. telco, jamshedpur, district east singhbhum, through its managing director .....
Tag this Judgment!