Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: guwahati Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.067 seconds)

May 21 1992 (HC)

Shri Jagadish Bhuyan Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-21-1992

..... time of arrest?(ii) if paresh was a juvenile delinquent, whether his case would be governed by the juvenile justice act, 1986 or the terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987?2. paresh kalita was apprehended by the members of the border security force and he was made over to the civil police of udalguri police station on 6-11-91. the civil police arrested ..... paresh kalita on accusation of having committed offences under sections 3 and 4 of terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987 (for short 'tada (p) act'), section 120b of the indian penal code .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 1992 (HC)

Nirmalendu Banikya Vs. the Returning Officer and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-09-1992

..... stated that elections were held on 8th june, 1991, counting on 10-6-91 and final result was declared on 18-6-91. respondent no. 2 who had secured more than 20,000 votes was declared elected. it has been alleged that in postal ballot papers the petitioner was shown as a candidates of samajbadi janata party. the ..... in the petition and every such copy shall be attested by the petitioner under his own signature to be a true copy of the petition. section 83 of the act, inter alia, provides that an election petition shall contain a concise statement of material facts on which the petitioner relies and shall be signed by the petitioner and ..... . 5. main contention in the above petition is that the election petition does not disclose any cause of action as required under the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951 and election symbol (reservation and allotment) order, 1968, as well as, conduct of election rules, 1961. referring to provisions of para 13 of the election symbols ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1992 (HC)

The Gauhati High Court Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Apr-01-1992

..... penalty prescribed in rule 7, that is, either major or minor, is appellable. existence of right of appeal is consistent with principles of natural justice and the security which is to be assured to members of the subordinate judiciary. there is nothing incongruous in a right of appeal. the 'right of appeal' protected under the ..... by which the designation of subordinate judge was altered to assistant district judge. on 16-8-1967 new rules for the assam judicial service were brought into force. the high court thought that the change in the designation and the change of the rules was a fraud upon the constitution. the supreme court observed ..... provisions relating to district judiciary or subordinate judiciary. they constitute definite improvement over the parallel provisions contained in sections 254 to 256 of the government of india act, 1935. article 233 deals with appointment, posting and promotion of district judges to be made by the governor in consultation with the high court. article 234 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //