Skip to content


Boost - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: boost Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 500 results (0.165 seconds)
Dec 21 2002 (HC)

Anil Pathak Vs. Jai NaraIn Vyas University and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Dec-21-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)WLC593; 2003(1)WLN152

bhagwati prasad j 1 the petitioner in this writ petition claims that he was appointed as asst professor on 03...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2002 (HC)

Shiv Kant and Bros. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)184CTR(Raj)534; [2004]270ITR499(Raj)

bhagwati prasad j 1 the petitioners in the present writ petition are partnership firms these firms were subjected to procedure...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2002 (HC)

Smt. Vimla Vs. Additional Collector and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-26-2002

Reported in: 2002(3)WLC680; 2002(4)WLN177

bhagwati prasad j 1 in these present writ petitions the petitioners have raised the grievance against the order passed by...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 17 2002 (HC)

Chandra Shekhar Vs. State and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-17-2002

Reported in: 2003WLC(Raj)UC64; 2002(3)WLN91

bhagwati prasad j 1 heard 2 the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with a prayer that...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 07 2002 (HC)

Smt. Bhuri Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jan-07-2002

Reported in: 2002WLC(Raj)UC367; 2002(3)WLN94

bhagwati prasad j 1 the petitioner in this writ petition is a sarpanch an enquiry was initiated against her in...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 2002 (HC)

Chhogmal Chiranji Lal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-22-2002

Reported in: [2002]257ITR51(Raj); 2002(3)WLN564

bhagwati prasad j 1 the present batch of petitions involve identical questions of law and facts in this background they...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 15 2002 (HC)

The Special Tahsildar (L.A.), Master Plan Complex, Virudhunagar Vs. Ka ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-15-2002

Reported in: (2002)3MLJ273

..... to be a stray incident and obviously the price has been boosted up in that transaction as far as the sale transaction ..... that the state has not attacked the said transaction as a boosted one still the court can take into consideration the other ..... financial loss as the dishonest land owners creating bogus transactions mentioning boosted sale price will be very bright and uncontrollable 20 land .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2002 (HC)

P.G. Vivekanandan and ors. and Archean Granites Ltd. Vs. R.P.S. Benefi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-2002

Reported in: [2003]115CompCas649(Mad); (2006)2CompLJ134(Mad); [2004]49SCL671(Mad)

..... the time of purchase it was also suggested might have been a boosted price for the purpose of creating a security mrs nalini chidambaram ..... also suggested that the purchase price itself might have been a boosted price for various other reasons and in particular to show as ..... crores this valuation of assets it is pointed out is a boosted value the evaluation of the assets of the company had been .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 24 2002 (HC)

Star India Private Limited Vs. Leo Burnett (India) Private Limited

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-24-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)BomCR655; 2003(27)PTC81(Bom)

..... obvious the defendants have attempted to encash the goodwill generated by the plaintiffs serial to boost the sale of the defendants product this is actionable per se if such conduct is ..... to attract the public but are doing so for commercial gain the defendants wish to boost the sale of their products by encashing the goodwill of the plaintiffs a more fraudulent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Terai Overseas Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Oct-01-2002

Reported in: 2003LC560(Calcutta),2003(156)ELT841(Cal)

..... manufactured in india and exported therefore the main purpose of the said rules is to boost export and earn foreign exchange admittedly in the instant case the export had taken place ..... a liberal construction as is required to further the object behind drawback rules namely to boost export 35 therefore this court is of the opinion that the requirement of rule 13 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //