Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1958Kant184; AIR1958Mys184; (1958)36MysLJ150
..... ) and (2) of section 22 of the bombay district municipal act, 1901. it would not be necessary for me at this stage to refer to any ..... such power upon the learned judge in question before he could act under sub-section (2) of section 22 of the said act.6. in order to appreciate this contention, it would be necessary to refer to some of the provisions of the bombay district municipal act, 1901 and the states reorganisation act, 1956. i have already referred to sub-sections (1 ..... or not the notification issued by the government of bombay under sub-section 2 of section 22 of the said act can be said to be a law in force immediately before the appointed day. 'law' has been defined in sub-clause (h) of section 2 part i of the states reorganisation act, 1956 as follows :'law' includes any enactment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR784; 2007(5)MhLj454
..... bankimchandra had not followed the decision of the apex court in sudhakar vitthal, observing that issue of effect of provisions of states reorganization act, 1956 and bombay state reorganization act, 1960 was not brought to the notice of the apex court. it is therefore, necessary to carefully consider the judgment in bankimchandra ii and ..... paragraph 9 the bench then observed as under:we may now consider sections 26 and 27 and also the viith and viiith schedules to the bombay reorganization act, 1960-. by virtue of the viith schedule, the tribes for the state of gujarat and maharashtra were notified in parts vi and part vii-a ..... to the question of migrants. the case pertained to persons residing on the date of presidential notification in different parts of the same erstwhile state, which upon reorganisation became parts of different states. the petitioner therein, sudhakar, hailed from pandhurna, district : chhindwara and claimed at chandrapur (maharashtra state) to belong to halba, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1964SC1690; (1964)66BOMLR698; [1964(9)FLR324]; (1964)IILLJ639SC; 1965MhLJ73(SC); [1964]7SCR639
..... words :- 'nothing in sub-paragraph (2) shall be deemed to affect the right of the maharashtra state road transport corporation, subject to the provisions of s. 77 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 (11 of 1960) to determine or vary after the appointed day, the conditions of service of any person who is continued in the service of the corporation'. 'provided that the conditions of ..... were known as the provincial transport services, and the state transport, marathewada, became the commercial undertakings of the state of bombay. further, territorial changes occurred in the state of bombay in the year 1960. by the bombay reorganisation act, no. 1 of 1960, the state of bombay was again divided; part of what was in the former state, was formed into a new state by the name of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR2000Bom211; 2000(2)ALLMR48; 2000(2)BomCR556
..... court for the area of state of gujarat including kutch district has been taken away. it is thus submitted by the defendants that on and from coming into effect of bombay reorganisation act, 1960, the bombay high court has no jurisdiction to exercise any judicial power in respect of kandla port which is part of kutch district in the state of gujarat.4. it would ..... came to be formed in the year 1956 under the act of 1956 was further reorganised under the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 (act of 1960). the appointed day of the said act is 1st of may 1960. under section 3 of the act of 1960, state of gujarat was formed comprising some of the territories of bombay and the residuary state of bombay was named the state of maharashtra. the territories which form the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1998KAR1532; 1998(2)KarLJ621
..... in which the impugned enactment continues in its extra territorial application beyond the limits of the erstwhile state of bombay now the state of maharashtra.2. consequent upon the enactment of the states reorganisation act, state of mysore-now the state of karnataka was carved out as an independent administrative unit comprising the following ..... scheme underlying the bombay act in its application to the bombay karnataka areas as against other enactments that are applicable to the remaining areas of ..... could never have been meant to stretch itself for that long. the provisions of the bombay act can therefore no longer be sustained for their constitutionality only on the beneficence of section 119 of the states reorganisation act.15. it is time now to examine whether there is any material difference between the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 1974MPLJ691; [1974]34STC504(MP)
..... 2. before 1st november, 1956, balaghat and nagpur districts were both in the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh. the new states of madhya pradesh and bombay (now maharashtra) were constituted by the states reorganisation act, 1956, which came into force on 1st november, 1956. nagpur district is now included in the state of maharashtra, whereas balaghat district is in the ..... this petition under article 226 of the constitution seeks to challenge an order of assessment of sales tax passed by the sales tax officer, chhindwara circle, on 23rd april, 1960. the period for which the tax was assessed by this order is from 1st october, 1953, to 26th december, 1968. the sales assessed relate to manganese ore raised ..... was also observed that the act nowhere provided any fixed period as unit of assessment. support was also taken from the decision of the supreme court in state of orissa v. chakobhai ghelabhai & co. [1960] u s.t.c. 716 (s.c.) battulal's case m.p.l.j. 915 was followed in l.j. patel & co. v. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1997)2GLR1530
..... cannot be changed to their disadvantage without prior approval of the central government under the provisions of section 115 of the state reorganisation act, 1956 and section 81 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960. that decision has been accepted and circular has been issued by the respondents to give effect thereof. though option was also ..... take appropriate action to get the approval of the rules framed by the central government as required under section 115 of the state reorganisation act, 1956 or section 81 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, and as such denial of the claim of petitioners for promotion is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory.6. reply to this special ..... state of gujarat. the petitioners have come up with the case that even under the provision of section 81(1) of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, their service conditions were protected though change therein could have been there only with prior approval of the central government. in view of the amending .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1992Bom435; 1992(3)BomCR494; (1992)94BOMLR984
..... a new high court for the state of gujarat created by the said act. all these acts were ordinary laws.'as stated hereinabove, this ..... s. 28 of the andhra state act, 1953 (xxx of 1953) which act formed a new part a state to be known as the state of andhra. part v of the state reorganisation act, 1956 (xxxvii of 1956), did it for certain new and reorganised states and part iv of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 (xi of 1950) constituted and established ..... the supreme court in narottamdas's case : [1951]2scr51 (supra). it was a case wherein thelegislative competence of the provincial legislature as regards the bombay city civil court act, 1948 was challenged. the 1st respondent in this appeal was narottamdas who presented a plaint to the prothonotary and senior master of the high court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1962Guj128; (1962)0GLR269
..... was a court co-ordinate in jurisdiction with this high court. my lord the chief justice has in his judgment referred to various sections of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, which clearly show that this high court has been invested with the same jurisdiction, power and authority as was exercised immediately before the appointed day ..... since we indicated to the parties that we were inclined to accept the first contention based on the construction and meaning of section 87 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960. we did not, therefore, examine this con-tention in any detail but on the arguments advanced before us we felt some difficulty in reach, ..... strongarguments in favour of the view taken by the former full bench.31. before i deal with the question of interpretation of section 87, the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, (hereafter called the 'act') it is necessary to make a few preliminary observations. the high court of gujarat has jurisdiction over the state of gujarat. this state-was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1965Guj234a
..... in one state. when one turns to the provisions of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, the same provision is also be found in that act. the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 was undeniably an act dealing with a similar subject matter, namely,reorganisation of the state of bombay. the state of bombay was divided into the state of maharashtra and the state of ..... assisting it in regard to the division and integration of the services among the states of maharashtra and gujarat. now under the bombay reorganisation act, 1960 the state of bombay was bifurcated into two states and the only question which could arise in this regard to service personnel was dividing service personnel between ..... be granted to the petitioners in connection therewith. reliance has been placed in this connection on sub-section (6) of section 81 of the bombay reorganisation act, 1960, which runs as under :--'nothing in the section shall be deemed to affect, after the appointed day, the operation of the provisions of chapter .....
Tag this Judgment!