Skip to content


Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Amendment And The City Of Nagpur Corporation Repeal Act 2011 Maharashtra - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: bombay provincial municipal corporations amendment and the city of nagpur corporation repeal act 2011 maharashtra Page 1 of about 601 results (1.727 seconds)
Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Jaishri and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Ur ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... bombay provincial municipal corporations amendment and the city of nagpur corporation repeal act 2011 be deemed to have been constituted under this act and accordingly the provisions of this act ..... the maharashtra municipal corporations and municipal councils amendment act 1994 an existing corporation for a city constituted under the bombay provincial municipal corporations act as amended specified .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 1984 (HC)

Bajirao Tukaram Manav Vs. Administrative Officer and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR587

occasion to consider the claim made against the sheriff of bombay and it was held that sheriff of bombay was not costs service termination sections 4 5 and 487 of bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 and section 62 of bombay primary plaintiff was not maintainable as the notice given to the municipal commissioner under section 527 of the old municipal corporation act termination sections 4 5 and 487 of bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 and section 62 of bombay primary education act be ascertained it may be that this perhaps is an amendment of karnataka however it is obvious that when this order with carrying out the provisions of this act for each city a corporation b a standing committee c a municipal commissioner servant of the corporation is not valid notice to the corporation and this court came to the conclusion that the suit that the municipal commissioner who is an authority under the act is vested with the powers to defend the suit the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2014 (HC)

Municipal Labour Union and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Throug ...

Court : Mumbai

articles 243w article 243x article 243zb and article 304 b bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 section 3 section 4 section that the amendment has been brought in by the bombay provincial municipal corporations amendment act 2009 act no 27 of 2009 the municipal corporation there is a tendency to override the municipal corporation and through the commissioner therefore the commissioner may forward unilaterally without taking the respondent no 2 to 6 municipal corporations into confidence and the same is at the instigation of the affidavit in reply 30 mr shinde submits that the amendment has been brought in by the bombay provincial municipal corporations on the entry of goods into the limits of the city for consumption use or sale therein in lieu of octroi paperboards v s mandal revenue officer 6 air 39 1952 nagpur 10 c n 7 state govt madhya pradesh v s would be taken cognizance of by municipality or by municipal corporation while fixing the annual letting value per square foot on commissioner being one of the authorities specified by the said act thus cannot be held to be a parallel authority and upon introduction of such provision with effect from 21 05 2011 the municipal corporations are obliged to seek an approval in be registered due to they being already registered under the maharashtra value added tax act 2002 rule 9 3 of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 1988 (HC)

Navinchandra M. Randoria and ors., Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1989Guj209; (1989)1GLR330

the corporation has passed resolution under s 210 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act prescribing the roadline for further widening was in force and as such the provisions of the provincial municipal corporation act which came much later to the prescribing petitioners spelt out mala fides on the part of the municipal corporation since according to her it wanted to deny sufficient to be acquired under ss 210 and 216 of the corporations act and if such acquisition is made the petitioners will them before the amendment was carried out even in the amendment carried out according to mr g n desai there is letter dated 11th december 1987 in that letter the additional city survey superintendent had informed the corporation that there is no the petitioners houses may be acquired 5 the surat municipal corporation has requested the government to acquire the land of the s 23 and also s 28 of the land acquisition act along with ss 210 to 216 of the bpmc a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 2003 (HC)

Avinash S/O Pandurang Tarawade and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(5)BomCR913; 2004(2)MhLj511

on an entry of a vehicle the board under the bombay motor vehicles tax act 1958 is only prohibited to charge situated the relevant portion of section 127 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 hereinafter referred to as the corporation first question under section 127 1 of the bombay provincial municipal corporation act is it possible for the corporation to impose the corporation under section 127 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 under the corporation act a tax can be described as a toll on animals and vehicles entering the city as also any other tax not being a tax on a local area and has conferred such powers on the corporation by virtue of section 127 1 f of the corporation can charge a tax considering section 127 of the corporation act and is not barred from imposing such a tax merely 1995 1scc351 before the apex court the issue was the maharashtra tax on entry of motor vehicles into local areas act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 1999 (HC)

Vijay Krishna Kumbhar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2000(2)BomCR293

objects and reasons dated july 10 1954 published in the bombay government gazette dated july 19 1954 suggests that the government accordance with the provisions of section 255 of the bombay provincial municipal corporation act 1949 hereinafter referred to as the b and 18 2 while in the case of regional planning municipal corporation or municipal council is totally prohibited from granting any and declaration under section 6 thereof d bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 section 481 i legal proceedings withdrawal or compromise section 59 enables the planning authority to provide for suitable amendments to the development plan in case it is inconsistent with reservation of the said property for primary school thus the city engineer pune municipal corporation pune has refused sanction to the whole of the state of maharashtra excluding the city of nagpur this act requires every local authority to prepare a development matter as if in chorus that approval of pune municipal corporation was necessary by resort to the mode prescribed under section compensationto be given in respect of any plot under the repealed act shall in so far as it is not inconsistent act but was added by an amendment made by maharashtra act 14 of 1971 j section 50 provides that the appropriate challenge the action of the first respondent the state of maharashtra and the commissioner of pune municipal corporation hereinafter referred to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2005 (HC)

Sunil Ramdas Kotkar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR143; 2005(4)BomCR117; 2005(4)MhLj375

petition cannot be accepted as proved or established facts c bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 section 19 election of mayor and therefore while interpreting section 19 iaa of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 the provisions of the maharashtra local substantiate his contention that the leader of opposition in the municipal corporation having greatest numerical strength is to be recognized as while interpreting section 19 iaa of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 the provisions of the maharashtra local authority members of opposition of party on commencement of this act as amended by act no xi of 2002 congress i claimed that to our notice the letter from the president of the city unit of bjp at page 11 a dated 8th april the group consisting of all the councillors of the municipal corporation for the time being belonging to that political party or be from amongst the ruling party he contended that the action of respondent no 3 to nominate the respondent no 4 bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 the provisions of the maharashtra local authority members disqualification act 1987 cannot be ignored and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1967 (SC)

New Manek Chowk Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Munic ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1801; (1968)0GLR390; [1967]2SCR679

bird s eye view of the relevant provisions of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act lix of 1949 under which the to a large number of municipal acts passed by different provincial and state legislatures in india both before and after 1935 prohibition or other order restraining respondent no 2 the deputy municipal commissioner from acting under deputation under section 49 1 and 1 3 and 4 and 129 of bombay provincial municipal corporations act 1949 respondent imposed property tax on special property and signature that except in the cases if any in which amendments have been made as shown therein no valid objection had conditions provided be levied on buildings and lands in the city one of these mentioned in clause c is a general levied for the year have been duly fixed by the corporation and the period fixed by public notice as hereinafter provided in the market and not necessarily that at which the actual occupier can borrow or obtain money mr setalvad placed reliance

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 13 1972 (HC)

ismail Karimij Devdiwala and ors. Vs. the Municipal Corporation of the ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1973Guj195; (1973)1GLR347

the actual wording used in section 48 2 of the bombay district municipalities act wherein in section 48 2 the words 8 appeal dismissed civil illegal construction section 254 of bombay provincial municipal corporation act 1949 petitioner challenged order of removal of made or who were not the rate payers of the municipality since by law cannot be made under section 48 so against the plaintiff for making any construction without intimating the corporation in support of his case mr zaveri referred to the of the act the rules in the schedule a as amended from time to time shall be deemed to be part was subsequently included within in the municipal limits of the city of ahmedabad 2 the facts giving rise to this appeal all the requirements of section 460 were followed by the corporation before farming the by law it is not the say came into operation as the rules are part of the act the accused was deemed in law to know the provisions

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 2000 (HC)

Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Vs. Vijay Owners Association

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)3GLR2505

provisions contained in the development act 48 so far as bombay provincial municipal corporations act is concerned the rules framed under contained in the development act 48 so far as bombay provincial municipal corporations act is concerned the rules framed under the in the case of anupam rekadi cabin associatioon v jamnagar municipal corporation reported in 1995 1 glh 586 per b n the development act 48 so far as bombay provincial municipal corporations act is concerned the rules framed under the act appendix matter for if the government had the power to make amendments under act 1 of 1948 the amendments in the rules court in the aforesaid case of municipal corporation of ahmedabad city v ben hiraben manilal supra pointed out that the object laws the petitioners had submitted their development plan to the corporation the corporation being the local authority has option therefore to not necessarily the act or the rules regulation made is repealed 41 section 49 refers to restriction of use of land it is provided in paragraph iii 6 of the said act that off street parking space for vehicles shall be provided the provisions contained in the act as well as the maharashtra industrial development act were considered by the court the purpose

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //