Bombay Prevention Of Fragmentation And Consilidation Of Holdings Act 1947 Section 35 Power Of State Government Or Commissioner To Call For Proceedings - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prevention of fragmentation and consilidation of holdings act 1947 section 35 power of state government or commissioner to call for proceedings Page 1 of about 196,247 results (0.129 seconds)State of Bombay Vs. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwalia and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1956Bom1; (1955)57BOMLR288; ILR1955Bom680
publications in various places in India including the State of Bombay.The Legislature of the State of Bombay passed the Act, being an Act dealing with gambling and that was the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, and we must look at that 30,000 in the. State of Bombay;2. the licensee shall not hold more than one prize competition during the period of two Sir Maurice Gwyer on the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act (Hindu Women's Bights to Property Act, 1937, In the matter trade of the petitioners.The nature of the lax imposed under Section 10A is a tax on the gross receipts from the both. The Provincial Legislature within the ambit of its own powers was sovereign and the powers conferred were to be construed freedom of trade, commerce or intercourse with or within the State as may be required 'in the public interest.There is a of the State of Bombay. Section 31 empowers the State Government to make rules for the purpose of carrying out the does not obviously attempt to impose any tax on the income of any trade or profession.But strictly constitutionally, there should be it need hardly be said that the expression 'trade and calling' used in entry 60 must be given the widest import, what is taxed hero is openly and obviously the gross proceeds in the hands of the petitioners. What is taxed is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhabai Mohandas Vs. State of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1955Bom439; (1955)57BOMLR827; 1955CriLJ1564; ILR1955Bom1039
He is therefore a person domiciled in the State of Bombay within the meaning of Section 4(b) of the Act.19. The apply. 37. There are three kinds of offences under the Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act. These are mentioned in Sections other State' under certain conditions. (See Section 10 of the Act).14. Under the Government of India Act and also under the occasions in 1948 and 1949. The Act consists of 9 sections. The first section states that the Act extends to the subject of domicile.20. The Act was passed in 1946 The powers of the Provincial Legislature to enact such laws were then legal meaning. They signify persons who reside in the Bombay State and who have an intention to reside for ever in the scope of powers conferred by Sections 99 and 100, Government of India Act, 1935, on the Central Legislature arose before Australian High Court in -- 'Broken Hill South Ltd. v. Commissioner of Taxation (N. S. W.)', (1936) 56 CLR 337. It enumerated in list III in Schedule 7 to the Act, called the 'Concurrent Legislative List'' One of the matters included in in a State' and resident in 'someother State' to institute proceedings in a matrimonial cause in 'that other State' under certain
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Ismail Hirji
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1930Bom49; (1929)31BOMLR1349
Patkar, J.1. In this case the Presidency Magistrate, Second Court, Bombay, has made a reference, under Section 432 of the Criminal reference arises was one under Section 4 of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act of 1887 and the facts are shortly that which it bears in the Criminal Procedure Code, I hold then that there was a complaint on oath as required warrant under Section 6 of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, he personally raided the premises in company with other not prepared to base their judgment upon a view of Section 6 contrary to the view taken in Fernad's case. In complaint Section 6 does not impose any limitation on the power of any person to make a complaint on oath to shortly these. On September 27, 1928, one Ibrahim Ismail's sworn statement was taken by the Commissioner of Police, Bombay, and he necessary to go into the question urged by the learned Government Pleader that even on the assumption that the offences were in this cage is a cognizable one but whether the Commissioner of Police was empowered to arrest. In Emperor v. Fernad
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Vs. Jayantilal Govinddas
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1953Bom82; (1952)54BOMLR790; ILR1953Bom91
for an offence under Section 12, Clause (a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act 1887 (Bom. IV of 1887), and an offence under Section 12 Clause (a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, and each one of them is sentenced 6. 12, Clause (a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, in the Court of the Fifth Additional City Magistrate, Ahmedabad. Nos. 1 and 2 are convicted of an offence under Section 12 Clause (a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, sentenced by the learned Fifth Additional City Magistrate, Ahmedabad.(2) Shortly stated, the facts of the case which gave rise to this entrance to Sankdi Sheri. On receiving that information, the Sub-Inspector called the punter and the 'panchas' and in the presence of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Shaikh HuseIn Shaik Mahomed
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1951Bom285; (1951)53BOMLR57; ILR1951Bom175
likely to result from the continued residence in the Greater Bombay of an immigrant, the Comr. of Police may by order Drugs Act, 1930, or (iv) Section 4 or 12-A, Bombay Prevention of GamblingAct, 1887, to remove himself in like manner from provisions of Article 15(1) of the Constitution. We must, therefore, hold that to the extent of this repugnancy, the subsection is of them. Sub-section (2-A) of Section 27, Bombay City Police Act, being repugnant to Article 15(1) of the Constitution, is, therefore, find no answer to the argument that Sub-section (2-A) of Section 27, Bombay City Police Act, discriminates between persons born in Govt., Pleader contended that under Section 27 (1) there was power in the Comr. of Police to extern even those persons under Article 15(1) of the Constitution, which directs that the Stateshall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, Act, 1930. (2-A) It shall be further competent to the Commissioner of Police to direct any person who, not having been was born outside Greater Bombay, that is, in a village called Ashtini, taluka Roha, District Kolaba. The appct. has stated in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Gauri Kom Krishna Bhandari and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1957Bom66; (1956)58BOMLR1046; 1957CriLJ362; ILR1957Bom98
the Learned Magistrate for offences under Ss. 4 and 5 Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The case for the Prosecution powers under Clauses (a) to (d), of Section 6, Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, be conferred upon him. But the Sub-Divisional 7, in our judgment, must arise. We are unable to hold that the exclusion of one or more of the powers issued was one under Section 6, Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act. On those facts this Court held that 'as neither the Emperor v. Pokka Kusaluppa 49 Bom LR 150 : AIR 1947 Bom 329 (B). In our view these cases do not which was prayed for and ordered, was a warrant under Section 6 Bombay Prevention of. Gambling Act and even the Sub-Divisional' hold that the exclusion of one or more of the powers granted under the warrant from the powers conferrable under Section On those facts this Court held that 'as neither the statement of the police Officer nor the form and contents of Magistrate or a Taluka Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government '(a) to enter, with the assistance of such persons as went to Avarsa on 26-8-1955 with a Police party. He called the panchas, and the police party then surrounded the house.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmperor Vs. Thavarmal Rupchand
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR158
As this is the first case of its kind in Bombay and gambling transactions in Kacha Khandi were tolerated for a Rupchand on a charge under Section 4(a) of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act IV of 1887. The accused was charged identify or locate the open space in question.40. He, however, holds that:-The open space in question is not in the occupation was a legal warrant under Article 6 of the Gambling Act.12. With regard to the second point, whether the articles found these entries was particularly within the knowledge of the accused. Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act requires that when any of all instruments of gaming found upon such search.7. The powers given under this section are very wide and are apt transactions in American Futures, Inspector Wagle in his evidence has stated that when he raided the accused's room he saw the East India Cotton Association, addressed a letter (p. 116) to Government in which he described the business carried on by the view, I hold that the warrant issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police and executed by the officers mentioned therein was East India Cotton Association, at p. 17, that the business called Kacha Khandi commenced on Saturday:-No delivery was ever given or any delivery in contemplation, and the question is whether the proceedings of the Association are consistent with any intention to give
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Vs. Narsing Lingo Deshpande
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1957)59BOMLR141
expert in public health. He is an M.B.B.S. of the Bombay University. He has stated in his evidence that his practice offence under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Bombay Prevention of Adulteration Act, 1925, could be said to have been that on the evidence before us we are unable to hold that the dye Metanil Yellow is injurious to health within is material for the application of Section 4 of the Act is whether the presence of an ingredient, in an article respondent under Clauses (a) and (6) of Sub-section (1) of Section 4 and sentence him to pay a fine of Rs. Yellow is positively harmful to the animate world. The third authority referred to by Dr. Rodd in support of his opinion He is an M.B.B.S. of the Bombay University. He has stated in his evidence that his practice in doing analysis in support of the opinion given by him is a book called 'Commercial Organic Analysis, 5th edition, Vol. VI,' by Aliens. In
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Vs. Narayandas Mangilal Dayame
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1958Bom68; (1957)59BOMLR901; 1958CriLJ161; ILR1957Bom880
of one of the contracting parties in the State of Bombay. Before we deal with this nexus, we think it is to consider the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, which is Act 25 o they referred the question as to the validity of the Act to the extent that it applies to marriages contracted outside Province can make. To proceed with the judgment:'The object of Section 4(b) is to compel permanent residents of the Province to modified by legislation passed by the State Legislature under its powers under the Constitution, for instance, the personal law with regard to those whom it chose to call domiciled in the State but which means permanently residents in the State, cannot enlarge same stature as Parliament possesses under the Constitution, because the Government Pleader had to concede that if he was right in and also the case of Broken Hill South Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Taxation (1936) 56 CLR 337. Now, these are cases Indian citizens residing in that Stale.11. The learned Judge then called attention to the case of Wallace Eros. & Co. Ltd. is not a law which a Province can make. To proceed with the judgment:'The object of Section 4(b) is to compel
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyedna Taher SaifuddIn Vs. Tyebbhai Moosaji Koicha and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1953Bom183; (1953)55BOMLR1
Bench of this Court was con-sidering the validity of the Bombay Harijan (Removal of Social Disabilities) Act, and we held that . What was challenged in that case was the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, and Article 35 was also had obtained a licence to sell spirits, and was actually holding it at the time when tho Act came into force, been validly excommunicated prior to 1-11-1949, as soon as the Act came into force he could no longer bo deprived of this legislation was passed. [4] Section 2 is the defining section, and it defines 'community' as a group, the members of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, and Article 35 was also relied upon in that case. We held in and it was also considering how and under-what circumstances that power can be exercised. We are not concerned with that question between religious faith and belief and religious practices. What the State protects is religions faith and belief. If religious practices run pression 'prohibit' used in Sub-section (2) (a) of Section 298, Government of India Act, 1035, and their Lordships construed 'prohibit' as to iuture removals only, and that it is not properly called a retrospective statute because a part of the requisites for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>