Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 10 deputies to commissioner Page 5 of about 10,194 results (0.221 seconds)

Shah Kalidas Madhavlal JaIn Vs. B.L. Thakore

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1991)1GLR634

..... said circumstances the defendant could have been said to be covered under the protection granted to him under sections 160 and 161 of the bombay police act, 1951. section 160 of the bombay police act, 1951 runs thus:no public servant or person duly appointed or authorised shall be liable to any penalty or to payment of any damages for ..... and accepting illegal gratification would not satisfy any of the two above said conditions and, therefore, the respondent was not protected under section 161 of the bombay police act, 1951.23. but it is interesting to note that at para 4 of the above said decision the supreme court speaking through the division bench has expressed ..... case against him for the offence of theft but later on a criminal case for the alleged commission of the offence punishable under section 110 of the bombay police act, 1951 was filed against him. but in that case the defendant - the complainant had never remained present and therefore the above said case against the plaintiff .....

Ashok Metal Corporation Vs. The Senior Inspector of Police and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... investigation or taking steps for confiscation. in the case reported as air 1975 sc 160 (champaklal ganeshmal v. state of maharashtra) provision of section 124 of the bombay police act, now maharashtra police act, is discussed. following observations are made by the hon'ble apex court in para 7 of the report:- "7. . . . it can hardly be ..... by the accused, that would be a distinct and independent offence under the indian penal code or the customs act, . . . and it would not be necessary to make it an offence over again under section 124 of the bombay police act. . . . if the property is capable of being described as "stolen property" or "property fraudulently obtained ..... in view of these circumstances it was necessary for the petitioner to show that it was legally acquired gold. relevant provisions of both the maharashtra police act and the customs act are not in favour of the claim of the petitioner. hereinafter this court is discussing those provisions. 11. section 102 of the code of .....

Bhola Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT383

..... it may equally have a prospective meaning.and while observing such, their lordships were pleased to hold in paragraph 12 in the following term:12. now, section 57 of the bombay police act, 1951, does not create a new offence nor makes punishable that which was not an offence. it is designed to protect the public from the activities of undesirable persons to have ..... ) v. vishnu ramchandra : 1961crilj450 , their lordships of the supreme court while dealing with the aforesaid proposition in the context of section 57 of the bombay police act which was in the following terms:(4) section 57 of the bombay police act reads as follows:removal of persons convicted of certain offences-if a person has been convicted-(a) of an offence under chapter xii, xvi or .....

Santosh S/O Bhagwan Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Its Pr ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... authority i.e. the case registered against the petitioner vide crime no.40/90 for having committed offence under section 4/25 of the arms act read with section 135 of the bombay police act registered on 28-2-1994. vijay damaji gaidhane v/s state of maharashtra, 2001 (supp 2) bom.c.r. 289. 12. in ..... the legislature has made only the subjective satisfaction of the authority making the order essential for passing the order. the contention that because in the amending act of 1951 an advisory board is constituted, which can supervise and override the decision taken by the executive authority, and therefore, the question whether the grounds are sufficient ..... in court, is clearly unsound. the satisfaction for making the initial order is and has always been under the preventive detention act, that of the authority making the order. because the amending act of 1951 establishes a supervisory authority, that discretion and subjective test is not taken away and by the establishment of the advisory board, .....

R.S. Yadav and Another Vs. Sumer Singh Salkan and Others

Court : Delhi

..... section 140(1) of the act, we are of the view that the high court was right in holding that the present case falls within the ambit ..... was whether the said matter was governed by section 161(1) of the bombay police act, 1951. it was held that unless there is a reasonable connection between the act complained of and the powers and duties of the office, it cannot be said that the act was done by the accused officer under the colour of the office (p. ..... the scope and duties of the respondent police officers and they are not entitled to the protection conferred by section 161(1) of the bombay police act. 19. having regard to the principles laid down in the aforementioned decisions of this court on provisions contained in section 161(1) of the bombay police act, 1951 which are similar to those contained in .....

Sarjubhaiya Mathurbhaiya Kahar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Police and a ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1984CriLJ1474; (1984)1GLR538(GJ)

..... in sandhi mamad kala v. state of gujarat (1973) 14 guj lr 384 whether in passing an order of experiment under section 56 of the bombay police act, 1951 and the state government in disposing of an appeal against an experiment order under section 60 are bound to give reasons in support of the orders respectively ..... urged before the supreme court. there the sections challenged were section 27(1)(a) of the city of bombay police act corresponding to section 56 and section 27(4) of that act corresponding to section 59 of the bombay police act, 1951. these sections were challenged as infringing the freedom guaranteed to the citizen under article 19(1)(d) and ..... krishna iyer asked in prem chand v. union of india : 1981crilj5 who will police the police3. sections 56 and 59 of the bombay police act, 1951 (bombay act no. xxii of 1951) are under attack in the petition before us. these provisions enable the commissioner of police, in an area where such commissioner has been appointed under section 7 of .....

Babubhai Mahmandbhai Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1990CriLJ653; (1989)1GLR574

..... department. it is as against these orders, the present special criminal application has been filed.2, show cause notice was issued under section 59 of the bombay police act by the police superintendent, (j) division, ahmedabad city, directing the petitioner to show cause against the allegations on 1-7-1987 at 16.30 hours. the notice ..... no relevance and irrespective of such detention, the authorities concerned can form the subjective satisfaction for the purpose of taking action under section 56 of the bombay police act. the facts reveal that such satisfaction was arrived at by the authorities concerned and hence we find that there is absolutely no substance in the argument ..... the mind of people, in respect of their person and property. in this connection, we can usefully refer to the provisions of section 56 of the bombay police act. it is clear from this section that whenever it shall appear to the authorities concerned that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person is .....

Emma Charlotte Eve Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)65

..... the prosecution to prove that the accused had knowledge of the contents of his luggage and had accordingly possessed and imported an intoxicant in contravention of the provisions of the bombay prohibition act. 26. in order to connect the appellant with the contraband, it is alleged that on 28th march, 1996, the parcel in question was posted from santa marta ( ..... changed and the containers being re-sealed cannot be ruled out. 30. in shafiullah vs . state : 49(1993)dlt193 , it was found that the seals remained with the police officers after use and the cfsl form was neither prepared on the spot nor deposited in the malkhana and this circumstance was held to be fatal to the prosecution case ..... was loaded into the trailer attached to a jeep car. some time later, the accused got into the jeep and when the jeep was about to start, a police head constable stopped it in order to made a search in connection with a suspected of-fence. on search, 75 bottles of foreign liquor were found in the trunks .....

Shri Vasant Bhaskar Parulkar and ors. Vs. Shri Mahesh Shivram Rege

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR446; 2007(4)BomCR39; 2007(5)MhLj674

..... for possession. we accordingly answer point no.1 in the affirmative. regarding point no.2 9. section 15 of the bombay rent act was amended by the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control (amendment) act, 1959 (bombay act no. 49 of 1959). the prohibition against sub letting or assignment of tenancy rights a tenant made prior to the coming ..... thus looked at from any angle, the trust became the tenant of the suit flat with effect from 1st february 1973 by virtue of amendment to the bombay rent act by maharashtra act no. 17 of 1973. it is worthwhile to note that though durgaprasad, the landlord, had filed a suit against shivram for possession he subsequently withdrew ..... no effect and be deemed never to have had any effect.10. the effect of amendment of addition of sub section (2) in section 15 of the bombay act no. 49 of 1959 is to retrospectively remove the prohibition against assignment or creation of sub tenancy by a tenant. not only that such prohibition was removed retrospectively .....

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Indokem Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1975]35STC432(Bom)

..... sub-section (1) of section 3 is concerned, to be a certificate of registration issued under the said act. one of the acts repealed by the said act was the bombay sales tax act, 1953. under rule 7(3) of the bombay sales tax rules, 1959, a dealer having places of business within the jurisdiction of different registering authorities is required ..... certificate of registration. prior to 1st january, 1960, the respondent-company had purchased goods of the classes described in schedules c, d and e to the bombay sales tax act, 1959, and in respect of the sale of these goods to the respondent-company the company's vendors had recovered from the respondent-company the amount of ..... set out earlier has been referred to us. 6. before us mr. dada, the learned counsel for the applicant, has submitted that the scheme of the bombay sales tax act, 1959, requires that there should be a separate registration certificate in respect of the branch of a dealer situate within the jurisdiction of a sales tax officer .....