Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 10 deputies to commissioner Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 56 results (0.112 seconds)

Bhola Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT383

..... it may equally have a prospective meaning.and while observing such, their lordships were pleased to hold in paragraph 12 in the following term:12. now, section 57 of the bombay police act, 1951, does not create a new offence nor makes punishable that which was not an offence. it is designed to protect the public from the activities of undesirable persons to have ..... ) v. vishnu ramchandra : 1961crilj450 , their lordships of the supreme court while dealing with the aforesaid proposition in the context of section 57 of the bombay police act which was in the following terms:(4) section 57 of the bombay police act reads as follows:removal of persons convicted of certain offences-if a person has been convicted-(a) of an offence under chapter xii, xvi or .....

Ashok Kumar Patel Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT263

..... reason of apprehension on their part as regards safety of person or property. construing a pari materia provision in section 27 of the city of bombay police act, 1902 in gurbachan singh v. the state of bombay and anr. : air 1952 sc 221, the supreme court observed:the law is certainly an extra-ordinary one and has been made only ..... state of n.c.t. of delhi and anr. v. sanjeev alias bittu (supra), the supreme court interpreting section 47 of the bombay police act, 1978, which is similarly worded as section 5 of the act of 1990, has held in para 25:it is true that some material must exist but what is required is not an elaborate decision ..... support of this submission, he cited the decision of the supreme court in pandharinath shridhar v. dy. commissioner of police, state of maharashtra : air 1973 sc 630 in which pari materia provisions of section 56 of bombay police act were interpreted and it was held that only the general nature of material allegations against whom the order of externment is .....

Shyama Charan Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1974MPLJ691; [1974]34STC504(MP)

..... haridas & co. v. s.p. kushare a.i.r. 1968 s.c. 565 held section 11(4)(a) to be invalid after the bombay sales tax laws (validating provisions and amendment) act, 1959, which made the period of limitation provided in section 11-a inapplicable to an assessment under section 11(4)(a). the minority judgment in the ..... 2. before 1st november, 1956, balaghat and nagpur districts were both in the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh. the new states of madhya pradesh and bombay (now maharashtra) were constituted by the states reorganisation act, 1956, which came into force on 1st november, 1956. nagpur district is now included in the state of maharashtra, whereas balaghat district is in ..... respect of the sales or purchases made by such dealer within the mahakoshal region during such period. similarly, the government of bombay, by an adaptation order, inserted in the central provinces sales tax act a new section 13-a, which is as under:where the amount of the tax due from a dealer for any period prior to .....

Brij Gopal Denga and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979MP173; 1978MPLJ70

..... the indian society. it was, therefore, rightly held in fram nusservanji v. state of bombay, air 1951 bom 210 (fb) (approved on this point in appeal in state of bombay v. f. n. balsara air 1951 sc 318) that section 23(a) of the bombay prohibition act, 1939, which prohibited commending of any intoxicant was not a law in the interests of ..... not available for limiting the meaning of the word 'morality' in clauses (2) and (4) of article 19. the patna high court in in re bharati press air 1951 pat 12 at p. 20 (sb) expressed the view that the words 'decency or morality' as they occur in clause (2) of article 19 are limited to offences ..... of society engaged in co-operative business. similarly, there is no fundamental right to have a society registered or to get the statutory privileges conferred by the act and other acts on registered co-operative societies. in these circumstances, and especially when there is no statutory compulsion that every co-operative society must get itself registered and when .....

Mohd. Nazeer Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(1)MPHT278

..... adjusted towards the total duty leviable on the conveyance, subject to a mihimum of rs. 10.7. this provision is almost identical in terms to article 25 of the bombay stamp act, 1958 which was construed by the supreme court in veena hashmukh jain and anr. v. state of maharashtra and ors. : [1999]1scr302 (supra), wherein in para ..... a part of the consideration and the duty was payable on the apparent sale consideration plus the amount of the charge. the explanation in article 23 of the act which widens the definition of conveyance does not require for its application that the agreement itself must recite that possession has been delivered or will be delivered later. ..... not commit any illegality in treating the instrument of agreement for sale as conveyance and demanding stamp duty with penalty from the petitioner under section 35(2) of the act before it could be admitted in evidence.9. if the petitioner decides not to pay the stamp duty and penalty as adjudicated by the trial court, the court .....

Sunderlal Patwa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1993MP214

..... sparked off reactionary incidents of arson, looting and killing of innocent persons; but that was in several cities of the state, although, as reported, the cities like bombay in maharashtra; ahmedabad and surat in gujarat; bhopal, ujjain and burhanpur in m.p. and a few cities in u.p. were worst affected, where number of ..... of madhya pradesh were worst affected. in some other parts of the state, there were sporadic incidents. instances of serious disturbances and riots were also reported from bombay in maharashtra and ahmadabad and surat in the state of gujarat.. the governor of the state of madhya pradesh on 8th' of december, 1992 reported the matter ..... and order situation has been handled in bhopal is not satisfactory, which may be viewed as both the act of commission and omission, serious reports of either police indifference or callousness or in adequate presence and even police indirectly fuelling the riot frenzy and mob fury have been received from a number of delegations which met me .....

Dr. Pradeep Kumar Soni Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1990CriLJ2055

..... offence is triable, in the instant case, sessions judge, district jalgaon, and the bail petition either at jalgaon sessions court or bombay high court may be presented.16. thus, the present petition under section 438, cr. p.c. suffers from jurisdictional impediment and ..... offence is committed has jurisdiction under s.438, cr. p.c.'jammu & kashmir high court in mohan singh v. commander of police, new delhi, 1983 cri lj, 1182 dissenting from calcutta view ruled that 'anticipatory bail only could be entertained in respect of ..... cannot discharge the function of the legislature in making law. see magor and saint mellons ruler district council v. new port corporation (1951) 2 all er 839 (hi.).10. bare reading of' the provisions of section 438, cr. p.c. does not ..... been quoted (para 10)'every clause of a statute is to be construed with reference to the context and other clauses of the act, so as, as far as possible, to make a consistent enactment of the whole statute. (per lord davey in canada sugar .....

Kailashpati Kedia Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ847

..... in liquor business-distillation and export thereof. it is asserted that a case under sections 65(a), 65(b), 66(l)(b), 80, 81 and 108 of the bombay prohibition act, 1949 has been registered in maharashtra against some persons including the present applicant. some of the accused persons have been arrested. accused-applicant is also apprehending his arrest ..... conflict of jurisdiction leading to contradictory decisions.9. shri desai has placed reliance on cases reported in : (i) 1983 cri.lj 1182 (s.b.) (j &k;), mohansingh v. commissioner of police; (ii) 1984 cri.lj 714 (s.b.) (p & h), ravinder mohan bakshi and anr. v. state of punjab and ors.; (iii) 1986 cri.lj 605 (fb) (patna), ..... the officer to execute the warrant at any place in india.sections 78 and 79 of the code deal with the warrant forwarded for execution or directed to the police officer for execution outside the jurisdiction. sections 80 and 81 deal with the procedure to be followed after arrest of the person.11. section 81 of the code .....

Manohar and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT326

..... the evidence, we deem it appropriate to refer to the cases cited in that regard. in shanwar manu koli v. emperor air (37) 1950 bombay 267, it has been observed that police evidence must not be discarded and conviction can be based on that evidence. similar observations were made in kochan velayudhan v. state of kerala : air1961ker8 ..... officer, rakesh kumar gurgamla (p.w. 20), being disinterested witness, his deposition is sufficient to prove the drawing of memo's under section 27 of the evidence act and the seizure at the instance of the accused persons, beside gopal singh (p.w. 12) has also supported the factum of seizure of crucial articles like watch ..... 12) has mentioned different place of seizure of some of the articles, thus, recovery was not made in his presence. the memorandum under section 27 of the evidence act were not recovered in his presence. his signature have been obtained in the memo's. consequently, seizure of articles has also not been established pursuant to the information .....

Usha Lyengar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... vs. the state (delhi admn.) . (air 198.sc 1883.and the order passed by the single bench of the bombay high court in the case of dr. dattatraya narayan samant vs. state of maharashtra ., (1982 cr.lj 1025). it was further submitted by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant ..... read with section 120-b of ipc were framed against the applicant-accused.3. the prosecution's case, in short, is that the applicant-accused had lodged an fir at police station gorakhpur on 16.3.2006 that four accused persons went inside the house of the applicant-accused and threatened him. they held the collar of the applicant- accused and ..... evidence 5 cr.r. no.2099/12 & 2008/12 collected by the prosecution and the charges of offence punishable under section 120-b of ipc cannot be framed without overt-act of the concerned accused as available to show his conspiracy. he has placed his reliance upon the judgment of hon'ble the apex court in the case of kehar singh .....