Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 1 short title extent and commencement Page 13 of about 11,306 results (2.581 seconds)

Bhanuprasad Hariprasad Dave and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1965)GLR958; (1970)ILLJ417Guj

..... functions in so far as the matter of the post-card was concerned. this argument runs counter to his submissions under s. 161(1) of the bombay police act, 1951 which we shall later notice but the argument needs to be examined. does s. 161, indian penal code require that the officer concerned must in fact ..... the section that the high court was construing was s. 80 of the bombay district police act, 1890. sub-section (1) of that section was substantially in terms similar to s. 159 of the bombay police act, 1951. sub-section (2) of that section corresponds to s. 160 of the bombay police act and sub-secs. (3) and (4) of that section correspond to ..... sub-secs. (1) and (2) of s. 161 of the bombay police act. in the criminal reference, the accused, a police sub-inspector, deliberately recorded incorrect statements .....

Mrs. Kalyani A. Shetty of Hotel Anand Punjab. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the impugned action is completely without jurisdiction. according to mr. kansara, the power to cancel license is conferred only by section 162 of the bombay police act, 1951( hereinafter referred to as "1951 act). according to mr. kansara, the license can be suspended by the competent authority only if any of it's conditions or restriction is ..... amusement including melas and tamashas rules (1960) framed by the commissioner of police, mumbai under section 33(1) (w) (wa),(x) and (y) of the 1951 act, are parimateria provisions of rule 277 of the rules for keeping places of public entertainment in greater bombay and, hence, ratio of the said judgment delivered by justice r. ..... is also having license to serve liquor and other alcoholic substances under the provisions of the rules framed under the bombay prohibition act, 1949. (b) on 21.08.2009, the senior inspector of police,traffic cell, social service branch of mumbai inspected the premises and on that occasion on the ground floor hall in .....

Ashok @ Aau S/O Pitambar Choudhary and Another Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the judicial pronouncement cited by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner carefully. 13. at the outset, it would be useful to reproduce section 57(1) of the bombay police act 1951 for the reference as follows:- 57. removal of persons convicted of certain offences:- [(1)] if a person has been convicted - (a) (i) of an offence ..... has dropped the said externment proceedings on 7.8.2007 observing that there were no sufficient grounds to extern the petitioner under section 56 (b) of bombay police act. however, according to the petitioner after lapse of about four years and that too on the verge of the elections of municipal council, a show cause ..... special duty in appeal no.235/2011 be quashed and set aside. 3. the petitioner is the aggrieved person against whom action under section 57 of the bombay police act, 1950 has been taken by the respondents, whereas respondent no.1 is the state of maharashtra represented through its principal secretary, home department, mantralaya, mumbai .....

Hotel Priya, A Proprietorship Vs. State Of Maharashtra .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to be cancelled after following the usual procedure.24. the above provisions are supplemented with the regulations protecting the dignity of women. the provisions of the bombay police act, 1951 and more particularly section 33 (1) (w) empowers the licensing authority to frame rules.25. rules 122 and 123 of the amusement rules, 1960 also ..... of the constitution of india.33. after considering the existing legal and regulatory regime including the act of 1951, and the rules involved in this the judgment concluded as follows:16. 132. the rules under the bombay police act, 1951 have been framed in the interest of public safety and social welfare and to safeguard the dignity ..... a total prohibition must also satisfy the test that a lesser alternative would be inadequate.]. the regulations framed under section 33(1)(w) of the bombay police act, more so regulations 238 and 242 provide that the licensing authority may suspend or cancel a licence for any breach of the licence conditions. regulation 241 .....

Association of Maharashtra Education Service Class Ii Officers Vs. Sta ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1991)IILLJ14Bom

..... class-iv government servants, the principal judge of the city civil court, bombay : the judges of the court of small causes, bombay : the administrator general and official trustee, bombay : and stipendiary patels appointed under section 16 of the land revenue code and section 5 of the village police act, 1887. it is not that rule 161 of the bcsr was of ..... government resolution, dated 13th march 1980 (annexure xiii), the government sanctioned the revised pay scale for the posts of directors, professors and associate professors at the institute of science, bombay, nagpur and aurangabad, and they were given the scales - rs. 1500-2500, 1500-2500 and 1200-1900 respectively - with effect from 1st july 1979. after the ..... at the age of 60 years without subjecting them to a review at the age of 50 and 55 years as required by rule 161(c-a) of the bombay civil services rules ('bcsr' for short), by clause 26 of the government resolution dated 27th february 1989, and (v) to quash rule 161 of the bcsr .....

State of Maharashtra and anr. Vs. Dilip Anant Surve

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR67; 2005(3)MhLj98

..... . state of maharashtra and ors., : air1977bom193 . the full bench held that there is the bombay police act, 1951 which had received the assent of the president on 1-6-1951. rules came to be made under the said act, known as the bombay police punishment and appeal rules, 1956 which hereinafter shall be referred to as the rules. by virtue of ..... was considered. it was next submitted that the bombay police rules do not provide specifically for appointment of enquiry officer and in the absence thereof the g. ..... initiated after that date can only be conducted by the police authorities. the learned bench observed that g, r. dated 29-12-1988 and the subsequent circulars issued dated 11-1-1990 or 6-1-2001 cannot override the statutory rules framed under the bombay police act, 1951. the nature of power to be exercised under rule 16a .....

State of Maharashtra and Khas Mohamad Basalataill Vs. Prabhatkumar Sha ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1985(1)BomCR609

..... further considered by this court in gorakh mahale v. state of maharashtra 1965 mh.l.j. 94, when it was held in terms that provisions of section 161 of the bombay police act as under the colour of office are more or less on par with the provisions of section 197 of the code. it was also held that those words would have ..... arose as the whether prosecution would lie after a period of six months, as contemplated by section 161 of the bombay police act, as the act was done under colour of office. the supreme court held that basically, it was within the capacity of the police officer to record a panchnama and make a report, which he could do honestly, in which event, it ..... were forged in pursuance of the said criminal conspiracy and were being used for the purpose of cheating. it is thus clear that the act of deceit amounting to cheating is operated on the officials of the bombay port trust so as to induce them to issue a license in favour of accused no. 3 on the fake documents, which otherwise .....

Shri Shadeb Gulam Mohd. Dhamankar Vs. Shri M.N. Singh, Commissioner of ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)104BOMLR783

..... order is founded on one c.r., namely, c.r. no. 164/2000 under sections 307, 384, 387, 34 of the indian penal code read with 37(a) of the bombay police act, registered on the basis of a complaint dated 7.9.2000 lodged by mohammed yunus mohamed nafiz qureshi at sir j.j. marg ..... him is that he could make a representation against the order issued by the state government meaning there by that he had a right to make a representation against the police commissioner.mr. tripathi urged that on account of this infirmity in the translation, the detenu would have been confused, in exercising his fundamental right of making an effective and ..... with government order, home department (special) no. dds-1301/l/spl-3(b) dated 23rd january, 2001, the commissioner of police, brihan mumbai directs that the detenu shall be detained under the said act in hindi translation of the aforesaid paragraph of the detention order words 'now therefore in exercise of the powers conferred under section 3(1)' and 'the date .....

K.K. Patel and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3346; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)115; 2000CriLJ4592; (2000)4GLR823; JT2000(7)SC246; 2000(4)SCALE572; (2000)6SCC195; [2000]Supp1SCR312

..... and deciding the said issue has clearly transgressed her jurisdiction.11. merely because the appellants did not raise the legal points based on section 161 of the bombay police act before the metropolitan magistrate they are not estopped from canvassing on that additional grounds also before the sessions court in revision as they were challenging therein the very ..... ahmedabad (v. n. yagnik) upheld the objections on both counts, one based on section 197 of the code and the other on section 161(1) of the bombay police act. consequently the process issued by the trial court was quashed and the complaint itself stood dismissed.9. learned single judge of the high court of gujarat in the ..... 417 of the indian penal code (ipc for short) read with sections 120b, 34 and 109 of the same code. the offence under section 147(g) of the bombay police act is also included in the complaint.4. a brief account of the events which preceded the filing of the said complaint is necessary. on 24-8-1992, one jaffer .....

The State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Officer Vs. Maroti S/O ...

Court : Mumbai

..... 33 framed for commission of offences under sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149, 307 r/w 149 of ipc r/w section 4/24 of arms act, 135 of bombay police act against all and for offence under section 452 of ipc against a1 and a2 vide their pleas respectively at exhs. 34 to 38.14. the prosecution in ..... same.126. similarly the observations made by the trial court in paragraph no. 74 of the judgment reveals that sub divisional magistrate had issued promulgation under section 37 of bombay police act, prohibiting villagers from keeping in possession of arms like swords etc. the copy of order is produced on record. it being a public document can be taken into ..... intention to kill them and accused persons being in possession of prohibited weapons and so also having violated proclamation issued by sdm under sections 37, 39 and 40 of bombay police act and consequently convicted and sentenced a1, a2 and a3 and acquitted a4 and a5 accordingly.19. mr. shrivastava, the learned advocate for a1 and a2, in support .....