Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police act 1951 maharashtra section 1 short title extent and commencement Page 11 of about 11,306 results (0.323 seconds)

Vijay and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... santoshrao walake are sentenced to pay a fine of rs.500/- each in default to undergo simple imprisonment for fifteen days for the offence punishable under section 135 of the bombay police act. (f) the sentence shall run concurrently. (g) the accused persons be given set off under section 428 of the cr. p. c. (h) accused nos. 2, 7, ..... 353, 332, 307, 302, 120(b) read with sections 34 and 149 of indian penal code and under section 4 read with section 25 of indian arms act and section 135 of bombay police act. accused denied all the charges and claimed to be tried. the defence of accused persons is of total denial and of false implication as according to some accused ..... 149, 186, 120(b), 332, 353, 307, 302 read with section 34 of indian penal code and under section 4 read with section 25 of arms act and section 135 of bombay police act. trial against accused no.3 sachin arunrao gawande came to be abated since dead. trial against accused no.17 raju tukaram gaikwad could not be conducted since he .....

Arnab Manoranjan Goswami Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... under section 173(8) of the crpc is independent of the jurisdiction of the magistrate. in the view of the state, section 4 of the bombay police act, 1951 entrusts the superintendence of the police force to it and in the exercise of that power, it was legitimately open to the home department to direct a further investigation (though the letter ..... cjm passed an order accepting the report and granted an a summary. the meaning and import of an a summary is reflected in para 219 (3) of the bombay police manual, 1959. an a summary indicates a case where an offence has been 8 part b committed but it is undetected, in that there is no clue about ..... to justify their being sent up to the magistrate for trial. para 219 (3) of the bombay police manual reads thus:"rule219(3) of bombay police manual (3) the final report should be written up carefully by the officers incharge of the police station personally and should be accompanied by all the case papers numbered and indexed methodically. if the .....

Zakir Abdul Mirajkar Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the air of the argument which was founded on para 25 of the police manual. the police manual purports to contain rules under the bombay police act 1951, the bombay police (extension and amendment) act 1959 and other departmental regulations. para 25 of the police manual provides that: 25. superintendent of police: (1) subject to the orders of the district magistrate and the ..... strictly. an addl. sp is not of the same rank as an sp because: i. section 8 of the bombay police act 1951 provides that the state government may empower an additional superintendent to 8 evidence act 10 part c exercise and perform all or any of the powers, functions or duties to be exercised or performed by ..... 427 of the indian penal code 1860,1 sections 4 and 5 of the maharashtra prevention of gambling act 1887,2 section 65(e) of the maharashtra prohibition act 1949 and sections 37 and 135 of the bombay police act 1951 was registered in ps rajarampuri, kolhapur on the basis of a complaint made by one of the members .....

Mohammad Daud Alias Mohd. Saleem Vs. Superintendent of District Jail a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1358

..... of the petitioner it has been contended by his learned counsel, that n.d.p.s. act being a central law and a special act, the provisions of section 36a will have overriding effect and section 96, bombay police act, 1951 would stand abrogated, meaning thereby, police remand could be granted under the provisions of section 167(2), cr. p.c. only for ..... of the respondents in support of their contentions in these regard are -- yashwant bapuji mokashi v. state of maharashtra, air 1968 bombay 273 : (1968 cri lj 903) laying down that the position under section 96, bombay police act, 1951 is different that the general law under section 167, cr. p.c. in so far as a presidency magistrate in greater ..... cr. p.c. as modified by section 96 of the bombay police act, 1951 applicable to the greater bombay have been implanted under the n.d.p.s. act and will regulate powers of a special court under the said act to grant remand, and in this view of the matter police remand from 11-7-1989 to 25-7-1989 granted by .....

Ankush Maruti Shinde . Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to suffer further r.i. for 1 month each.8. the accused nos. 1 to 6 are acquitted of the offence punishable under section 135 of bombay police act.9. all the sentences to run concurrently. 4. feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order of conviction and sentence imposed by the learned sessions ..... state to examine all orders of acquittal and to record reasons for the failure of each prosecution case. a standing committee of senior officers of the police and prosecution departments should be vested with aforesaid responsibility. the consideration at the hands of the above committee, should be utilised for crystallising mistakes committed during ..... imposed separate punishments for other offences for which they were convicted. all the convicted accused filed criminal appeal no.590/2006 before the high court of bombay against the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the learned sessions court. as observed hereinabove, the learned sessions court made a reference to the .....

Yogesh Pratap Singh Vs. Government of Maharashtra Through the Addition ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR1

..... in any way, less important than the post of additional i.g., mumbai. in view of the clear provisions of section 4 and section 6 of the bombay police act, 1951, and the affidavit made by shri samra, we find no substance in the petitioner's contention that his transfer to nagpur from mumbai as commandant, s.r. ..... of the case, initiation by any one else is mala fide. in this behalf, it is relevant to note that under section 4 of the bombay police act, 1951, the superintendence of the police force throughout the state vests in and is exercisable by the state government and the secretary to the state government in home department, whether designated ..... or otherwise in-charge of law & order division of the home department shall exercise control, direction and supervision over the entire police force. section 6 of the bombay police act, deals with the director general of police, who has to be appointed, subject to the provisions of section 4, by the state government, who shall exercise such powers .....

Balukishan A. Devidaval Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1891

..... police. having regard to the constitutional scheme of the state governments and the union government in relation to the notice organisation it is not ..... the government of the state in which such area is situated ' neither the r. p. f. act nor the r. p. u. p. act fall within the ambit of entry no. 80,70. in fact, so far as the maharashtra state is concerned, the police officers are appointed under the bombay police act, 1951. that act itself provides in section 22-a for the appointment of the railway .....

Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR125

..... the opinion of the majority on the above points. in n.p. nathwani v. commissioner of police (1957) 78 bom. l.r. 1, the validity of certain orders made by the commissioner of police under section 37(5) of the bombay police act, 1951, and of an order dated october 14, 1975 made by the government of maharashtra under rule ..... satisfaction, moreover, must be a satisfaction of the authority itself, and therefore, if, in exercising the power, the authority has acted under the dictation of another body as the commissioner qf police did in commissioner of police, bombay v. gordhandas bhanji : [1952]1scr135 , and the officer of the ministry of labour and national service did in simms ..... guidelines issued to the appellant under the censorship order, and the appellant, being n subordinate authority at bombay, was bound to follow such guidelines and that as he had followed these guidelines and had thus acted in pursuance of lawful instructions given to him, his orders could not be set aside by the court .....

Shailendrasingh Alias Litil Sardar Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)1889; 2001CriLJ4514

..... opportunity at all of hearting has been given in this case by the state government as statutorily required under section 60 of the bombay police act, 1951. this court has repeatedly held that opportunity of hearing under section 60 of the bombay police act is a must.6. in banas domnic miranda v. a.k. ankola reported in it was laid down by the division bench ..... -ii, nagpur city, nagpur, for a period of two years. the petitioner filed an appeal before the state government under section 60 of the bombay police act against the said externment order and the said appeal was dismissed by the principal secretary (appeals and security) to the government of maharashtra, home department, vide order dated 24th july, ..... of this court that having regard to the scheme of the legislation it cannot be said that the right of appeal conferred under section 60 of the bombay police act is any way illustory. it was specifically pointed out in para 13 of the said judgment that by section 60 of the .....

Rajpal Bhiraram Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC1150; 1974CriLJ806; (1974)3SCC633; 1974(6)LC12(SC)

..... on the second count. accordingly, we have examined the evidence only with respect to the first count relating to the offence under section 122(a) of the bombay police act. section 122(a) reads :whoever is found between sunset and sunrise-(a) armed with any dangerous instrument with intent to commit an offence....shall on conviction be ..... s.n. dwivedi, j.1. the appellant was convicted by the additional chief presidency magistrate, bombay, under section 122(a) and section 125(1) read with section 37(1)(a) of the bombay police act and was sentenced to three months' imprisonment under the first count. no separate sentence was passed on the second count. he filed an ..... appeal against his conviction and sentence in the high court of bombay. the appeal was summarily dismissed by a monomial order 'dismissed .....