Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay molasses control act 1956 maharashtra Sorted by: old Court: kerala Page 1 of about 222 results (0.096 seconds)

Aug 09 1976 (HC)

Balakrishnan, Managing Director, Terelac Furnaces Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1982]134ITR573(Ker)

..... this section, where any books of account, other documents, money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable articles or things belonging to a person have been seized as a result of a search under section 132 of the income-tax act or section 37a of the wealth-tax act, and such person, (hereafter in this section referred to as the declarant) makes on or after the date of commencement of this ordinance but before the first day of january, 1976, a declaration in accordance with sub ..... by reason of the omission or failure on the part of such person to make a return under the indian income-tax act 1922, or the income-tax act, or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment or otherwise.then, notwithstanding anything contained in any of the acts mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 8 of the wealth-tax act, the amount of income so declared or, as the case may be, the value of the assets representing such income, shall ..... facts necessary for the disposal of this petition can be briefly stated as follows: the company filed before the ito, bombay, its return of income for the assessment year 1967-68 in respect of the accounting year ended march 31, 1967. ..... under the new code, an ito can be said to be a court only when it is a tribunal constituted by an act and if that act declares the said tribunal to be a court for the purpose of this section. ..... state of maharashtra : 1964crilj249 , was not cited before me, i held that the ito is not a ..... state of maharashtra : 1964crilj249 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 1978 (HC)

P. Sundari Bai, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1979Ker68

..... the annual value of any land or building is attributable partly to the use of such land or building or any portion thereof for the display of any advertisement or advertisements and tax is levied under this act in respect of such advertisement or advertisements, the annual value of such land or building for the purpose of assessing the property tax thereon shall be ascertained as if such land, building or portion is not ..... petitioners submit that except in cases where the assessing authority considers the annual value fixed by the concerned local authority to be too low, the procedure for so called 'assessment' prescribed under the act involves nothing more than a mechanic cal adoption by the assessing authority of the fixation of the 'annual value' made by some extraneous authority and the making of an arithmetical calculation by multiplying such ..... is section 29 where-under it is declared that in fixing the fair rent of a building under section 5 of the kerala buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1965 (act 2 of 1965), the rent control court shall not take into consideration the building tax that ispayable in respect of the building under the provisions of this act.23. ..... then was, while dealing with the question of interpretation of the expression 'rate on buildings or lands' occurring in section 73 of the bombay municipal boroughs act has traced the origin and development, of the english rating law from which the word rate has been borrowed in this country for the ..... maharashtra .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 1982 (HC)

Food Inspector, Chalakudy Municipality and anr. Vs. Prabhakaran and or ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1983CriLJ81

..... shall intimate the result to the vendor from whom the sample has been taken and also to the person, whose name, address and other particulars have been disclosed under section 14a of the act, within 10 days from the receipt of the report from the public analyst.the controversy before us is whether the term 'immediately' should be read so as to hold that where the copy of the report is not sent on ..... , 683 thus ;in my view the law as laid down by the above decisions can be summarised as follows:(i) while taking action under clause (a) of sub-section (1), sub-section (2), sub-section (4) or sub-section (6) of section 10 of the act the food inspector must call one or more persons to be present;(ii) the obligation which section 10(7) casts on the food inspector is only to 'call' one or more persons to be present when he takes action. ..... food inspector 1082 cri lj 963 there is dual purpose sought to be achieved by the time element namely the trial of cases filed under the act are not protracted by the accused by making applications at a belated stage for the sample being sent to the central food laboratory for further report and at the same time ensuring that due opportunity is given ..... attention has been drawn to a decision of the high court of bombay in state of maharashtra , v. ..... if due to reasons which are beyond the control of the local (health) authority the report could not he despatched on the same day it will not be a violation of section 13(2) of the act and rule 9-a of the rules. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1997 (HC)

K.R. Jagadeesan Vs. Indian Crump Rubber Factory and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ536Ker

..... relying on the above said observation, the division bench of the bombay high court in maharashtra sugar mills ltd. v. ..... ashru jaiwant tribhuvan air 1966 bombay 240 a case arising under the workmen's compensation act, held that the bonus can be included in wages for purposes of calculation of compensation payable to the 'workman' who has suffered permanent disablement either total or ..... is an appeal filed under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') against an order passed by the workmen's compensation com-missioner (deputy labour commissioner, kot-tayam) under section 22 of the act.2. ..... the payment of bonus act, 1965 provides for payment of bonus to persons employed in a factory and hi every other establishment employing twenty or more ..... - in this act and for the purposes thereof the expression 'monthly wages' means the amount of wages deemed to be payable for a month's service (whether the wages are payable by the month or by whatever other period or at piece rates ..... claim for bonus being a right of the workman, inde-pendent of the willingness or otherwise of the employer, is a benefit within section 2(m) of the act. ..... fixation according to the counsel, does not conform to the provisions contained in sections 2(m), 4 and 5 of the act.7. ..... main question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether 'bonus' paid to an employee can be taken into considerationwhile determining the 'wages' as defined in section 2(m) of the act.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 07 2003 (HC)

Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Ker ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2006]143STC549(Ker)

..... also a registered company incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its office in state of andhra pradesh and having its branch at bombay. ..... this case took place from kerala to state of maharashtra at bombay where the sale is concluded. ..... actually moved from the state of kerala to bombay in the state of maharashtra pursuant to contract of sale dated june 1, 1974 ..... the central sales tax act, 1956 was enacted to formulate principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-state trade or commerce or outside a state or in the course of import into or export from india, to provide ..... the view that the goods were sent by the assessee only by way of stock transfer to bombay and the actual sale took place in bombay and there was no inter-state sale. ..... on the decision of the apex court in ashok leyland's case [1997] 105 stc 152, government pleader submitted that mere fact that assessee was assessed under the general sales tax act of a state is not the criteria to determine whether a sale is inter-state or not.8. ..... counsel also submitted that under section 6a(1) of the central sales tax act, the burden of proof is on the dealer to prove that movement of goods was occasioned not by reason of sale, but was occasioned by reason of transfer of such goods by him to any other place of business or to his agent ..... counsel submitted that movement of goods from kerala to bombay was not in furtherance of any contract of sale but moved independently to the branch .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2014 (HC)

Balakrishnan K.K. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... state of maharashtra) wherein it was held that, "claim for the enforcement of the fundamental right of equal opportunity under article 16 itself is a fundamental right guaranteed under article 32 and this court has been assigned the role of a sentinel on ..... state of maharashtra (1984 (2) scc337, wherein the apex court condoned a thirty year delay on finding that there is a violation of substantive legal right of the applicant. ..... m.r.meher, president industrial court, bombay and others) the w.a.no.1663/2013 20 constitution bench while examining a similar contention held as follows: " it is true that the issue of a writ of certiorari is largely a matter of sound discretion. ..... maharashtra industrial development corporation and others) in paragraphs 13 and 14 the following principles have been highlighted : " 13. ..... maharashtra industrial development corporation and others) 5. ..... chief controller of imports and exports ( 1969 (1) scc185, collector ( la) v. ..... 2003 ( 7) scc197( divisional controller, ksrtc v. ..... m.r.meher, president industrial court, bombay and others) 3. ..... the de freitas formulation has been applied by the house of lords and the supreme court as a test of proportionality in a number of cases under the human w.a.no.1663/2013 35 rights act. ..... as far as the above judgment (tukaram kana joshi's case (supra)) is concerned, it arose under land acquisition act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 1957 (HC)

Krishna Kutty Nair Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Trivandrum

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1960Ker31

..... against some of the workmen in the course of which, they placed the petitioner, general secretary herein and another under suspension and also filed two section 33 petitions for their dismissal.on 16-8-1956 the secretary of the union gave a notice to the management calling for the cancellation of all the disciplinary proceedings and further requiring the grant of all the demands of the workmen till ..... may possibly be different if the tribunal had retained control over the arbitrator's proceedings so as in the end to adopt according to its discretion, the award of the arbitrator as its own and be contrasted the position under charter xt of the bombay industrial relations act, 1946 (act xi of 1947) and the new provision section 10-a introduced by the industrial disputes (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act xxxvi of 1956.7. ..... secretary of the jumna thread mills employees' union, koratty and calling in question, on behalf of the employees, the award dated 16-9-1956 passed by the first respondent, the industrial tribunal, trivandrum in industrial dispute no. ..... dhutta, 1956-2 lab lj 319: (air 1956 bom 743) referred to by the learned counsel does not really support his position, that was a case where the jurisdiction of a conciliation court under the indus-trial disputes act to record a settlement already arrived at between the parties was questioned on the ground that the existence and apprehension of industrial dispute which alone gave jurisdiction to the conciliation officer had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1957 (HC)

V.M. Patel Vs. Inspector of Factories, Alwaye

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1958Ker237; 1958CriLJ1026; (1958)IILLJ405Ker

..... appears to have been clearly of the view that unless the persons engaged in a manufacturing process are persons employed by the person having the ultimate control over the business concern, they will not be workers as defined in the act.that is the reason why the second part of sub-section (1) of section 85 was enacted empowering the state government to issue a notification ..... factory at any time except during intervals for meals or rest, when work is going on or the machinery is in motion, he shall, until the contrary is proved, be deemed for the purpose of this act and the rules made thereunder, to have been at that time employed in the factory'.in order that the presumption under this section may be drawn, it must first be shown that the premises in question is a ..... obtaining the necessary registration and the license, and thus he is alleged to have contravened clauses (a) and(d) of section 6(1) and rules 3 and 4 of the rules made under the act.sub-section (1) of section 7 of the act requires the occupier to give a written notice to the chief inspector at least 15 days before ho begins to occupy or use any premises as a factory, containing the several particulars ..... all saheb, air 1955 bombay 209 (a) was also cited in support of that position.even though the definition of the word 'worker' in clause (1) of section 2 of the factories act arose for consideration in that case, the main question that arose for decision was whether the expression 'employed' as used in ..... 1956 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1958 (HC)

Arthur Import and Export Co. Vs. Collector of Customs, CochIn and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1958Ker357

..... treated as final and the reports of their own surveyors and insurance agents must have been given equal weight: so far as we could see, they have not challenged the act of the 1st respondent as such in sending the samples to bombay for the purpose of getting an expert opinion.it may be that they have not given their consent in writing, but all the circumstances and materials placed in this case clearly ..... docs not in any way recognise the powers of this court to interfere under such circumstances,in fact, according to the learned government pleader, the reasoning of their lordships of the supreme court in 1956 scj 323: ( (s) air 1956 sc 246) (c), is that when an order has merged in the orders passed by outside authority even the first order cannot be interfered with by this court. ..... -cochin high court directing the issue of a writ of prohibition against the income tax officer on special duty residing within its jurisdiction was confirmed by their lordships of the supreme court in 1956 scj 323; ( (s) air 1956 sc 246) (c).it is seen from their lordships' judgment at page 327 (of scj): (at p. ..... the government of india, by its order dated 8-3-1956 also refected the revision on the ground that there is no reason to interfere with the order passed by the collector of customs ..... , has if i may say so with respect, very exhaustively considered the position with special reference to the decisions of their lordships or the supreme court in 1956 scj 323: ((s) air 1956 sc 246) (c) referred to above. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1958 (HC)

N. Gopalan Vs. Central Road Traffic Board, Trivandrum

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1958Ker341

..... b clearly shows that the first respondent has applied his mind to these aspects before reversing the order of the regional transport authority.section 64-a of the motor vehicles act gives power to the state transport authority either on its own motion or on application made to it to call for the record of any case in which an order has been made by a regional transport authority in cases where no appeal lies. ..... there are other clauses giving a right to the board to control the strength of the rolling stock and allied items, to control capital expenditure on equipment and buildings, to recommend to the government acquisition and extension of lines and giving power to the board to arrange for survey of new routes and services existing and to make a report to the government. ..... the union of india, air 1950 sc 479 (y), was pronounced on 20-3-1956, that these petitioners woke up and asserted their alleged rights, the amritsar group on 20-4-1956 and the raichur group on 5-11-1956.if they acquiesced in the jurisdiction of the income-tax officers to whom their cases were transferred, they were certainly not entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of this court under article 32. ..... the learned judge following the decision-of the bombay high court referred to above, has held that the question of the tribunal's jurisdiction cannot he raised for the first time under article 226.36. ..... the learned judge following the bombay decision and the decision of mr. ..... bombay state, air '1954 bom 202 (t). .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //