Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay molasses control act 1956 maharashtra Page 1 of about 17,550 results (0.188 seconds)

Oct 09 2000 (TRI)

Shrigonda Sahakari Sakhar Vs. C.C.E.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2000)(122)ELT763Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the advocate, indicates that the committee that finalised the sale price of sugarcane, apparently under the bombay molasses (control) act, 1956 considered the molasses price realisation to be rs. ..... pmt is based on the sale price of molasses determined by a committee headed by the chief minister of maharashtra and therefore ought to be applied is unacceptable. ..... the question for consid-eration in this appeal is the value for assessment of the molasses produced by the appellant in its sugar mill and captively consumed by it in the manufacture of ..... what emerges from the letter therefore is that the possible sale price of molasses was a factor that was taken into account in determining the sale price of ..... the collector himself records that substantial quantities of molasses were purchased by the western maharashtra development corporation, a state government undertaking, at ..... the department did not accept this value on its finding that molasses had been sold at much higher prices during this period by other sugar mills, and proposed enhancement of the value to ..... the department which had proposed the increase in the price of molasses, it was therefore up to it to show that the molasses the sale price of which was sought to be applied was of the same grade as the molasses being valued. ..... next contended that the collector himself records that substantial quantities of molasses were sold by a sugar mill at majalgaon at rs. ..... letter dated 04.07.94 of the distiller's association of maharashtra to mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2005 (HC)

Bombay Environmental Action Group, a Society Registered Under the Soci ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(6)BomCR574; (2005)107BOMLR337; (2006)4CompLJ117(Bom)

..... in view of the facts disclosed in this case and in view of the totally casual and lackadaisical approach by the maharashtra pollution control board, bombay municipal corporation and state of maharashtra, it would be just and proper if public hearings are conducted by the ministry of environment and forests itself and not delegate to the state pollution control board, in view of the enormity of ecological imbalance and environmental degradation, especially having regard to the 'precautionary principle' and ..... nowhere so stated in the pleadings) that the phrase 'land after demolition of existing structures' from dcr 58 is deleted on account of the subsequent amendment of the definition of the word 'development' as contained in section 2(7) of the maharashtra regional & town planning act, 1966 ('mrtp' for short) and that it is contended by the petitioners that in dcr 58 of 1991 it was necessary to include the phrase 'land after demolition of existing structures' as prior to the amendment of section 2(7) of ..... that if, as per the contention of petitioners, the phrase 'land after demolition of existing structures' is deleted from dcr 58(1)(b) as it exists today, on account of the amendment of the definition of the word 'development' in section 2(7) of the act is correct, then the word 'development' in the opening part of dcr 58(1) with the previous approval of the commissioner to a layout prepared, inter alia, for making of any material change in any building or land or in the use of any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 1997 (HC)

Ambika Silk Mills Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR609; 1998(2)BomCR148; [1998(79)FLR1]; (1999)IIILLJ1095Bom; 1998(1)MhLj568

..... of 1987 whereby the industrial court declared that the employer has committed unfair labour practice under item 9 of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (for short 'mrtu & pulp act') and also declared that the notice dated 6-1-87 issued by the employer terminating the services of the workmen was illegal, void ab ..... circumstances of the case the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it appears to us that it is quite evident from the scheme of various subsections of section 25-o of the act that whenever an application for closure of an industrial unit is made by ah employer, the state government before whom such application is made is required to dispose of such application within sixty days from ..... mention that the maharashtra general kamgar union, though is neither representative nor approved union under the bombay industrial relations act, 1946, filed a complaint of unfair labour practice under section 28 read with item 9 of schedule iv of the mrtu & pulp act against the employer company ..... the state government was requested that because of the exceptional circumstances resulting in collapse which was unanticipated and beyond the control of the management, the plant has stopped functioning completely and, therefore, appropriate order be passed by the state government in exercise of their powers under section ..... incorporated under the companies act, 1956 having its office in bombay. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1986 (SC)

National Textile Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Sitaram Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1986SC1234; (1986)88BOMLR662; [1987]61CompCas373(SC); (1986)2CompLJ261(SC); 1986(1)SCALE657; 1986Supp(1)SCC117; [1986]2SCR187

..... october 29, 1982 at which were present the deputy governor, reserve bank of india, joint secretary, ministry of finance (banking), chief secretary, government of maharashtra, industries secretary, government of maharashtra, executive director and senior representatives of idbi and senior representatives of concerned banks, textile mills affected by the strike were classified into three categories on a ..... control of the textile company whether within or outside india and all books of account, registers and all other documents of whatever nature relating thereof.in the act, 'textile undertaking' as defined in section 2(d) reads : 2(d): 'textile undertaking' or 'the textile undertaking' means an undertaking specified in the second column of the first schedule.the term 'textile company' is also defined in section 2(e) as : 2(e) : 'textile company' means a company (being a company as defined in the companies act, 1956 ..... court on a petition under article 226 of the constitution filed by messrs shree sitaram mills limited, bombay (for short 'the petitioners') while upholding the constitutional validity of the textile undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1983 insofar as it provides by section 3(1) of the act for the taking over by the central government of the management in the public interest of messrs ..... maharashtra by its order dated may 25, 1982 declared the company's textile undertaking to be a relief undertaking entitled to protection under the bombay relief undertakings act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 2009 (HC)

Rajya Parivhan Yantrik Kamgar Sanghatana Through Its Regional Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj948

..... the question for consideration in this appeal is : does a representative union under the bombay industrial relations act, 1946 (bir act) have the exclusive right to represent the employees of the concerned industry in complaints relating to unfair labour practices under the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (m.r.t.u. ..... (2) notwithstanding anything contained in the bombay act, no employee in any industry to which the provisions of the bombay act, for the time being apply, shall be allowed to appear or act or allowed to be represented in any proceeding relating to unfair labour practices specified in items 2 and 6 of schedule iv of this act except through the representative of employees entitled to appear under section 30 of the bombay act.10. ..... akhil maharashtra kamgar union, thane had not taken into consideration an earlier judgment of this court in maharashtra general kamgar union, ghatkopar (east), bombay v. ..... the division bench deciding the case of maharashtra general kamgar union, ghatkopar (east), bombay v. ..... shramik utkarsh sabha applied for being impleaded as a party-respondent and the supreme court held, having regard to the entire scheme of the bombay industrial relations act read with relevant provisions of the mrtu & pulp act, that only a representative union under the b.i.r. ..... he submitted that this judgment had been noted by a division bench of this court in maharashtra general kamgar union, ghatkopar (east), bombay v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2001 (HC)

S.L.S. Textiles Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2002]126STC132(AP)

..... the use of the expression 'within the state of maharashtra' was not a condition as admittedly the power of the state government under the state sales tax law was to levy tax or to grant exemptions only in respect of sales or purchases taking place within the state ; (ii) that on a careful perusal of the scheme of the bombay sales tax act, in particular section 13 thereof, it was clear that purchase tax was leviable under certain specified circumstances in respect of ..... maharashtra sales tax tribunal [1993] 90 stc 195, the high court of bombay, nagpur bench, considered the notification issued by the state of maharashtra under the bombay sales tax act, 1959, whether the exemption granted under the said notification is a general exemption so as to extend the benefit of exemption under section 8(2a) of the central act ..... the said order was assailed before the bombay high court, while allowing the writ petition, it was held '(i) that looking at the notification dated july 24, 1981, it was clear that all sales of oil-cakes including oil-cakes used as cattle feed within the state of maharashtra were exempt from the whole of tax without ..... 9(1) of the state act, is only conditional and not general and therefore the benefit of exemption is not available in respect of the inter-state sales in terms of section 8(2a) of the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the cst act'). ..... claimed under section 8(2a) of the central sales tax act, 1956, in respect of the inter-state sales. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

Dalamal Tower Premises Co-operative Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Municipa ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR843; 2005(1)MhLj547

..... contention that the repeal of the old rent act and the applicability of the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 to the building in question does not change the situation so as to enable the corporation to assess the self-occupied units separately from the units which are in occupation of third parties on leave and licence basis and in that connection reliance is sought to be placed in the decisions in the matters of municipal corporation of greater bombay v. ..... it was further submitted that in view of the fact that the provisions of the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 are not applicable to the cases where the premises are occupied by the banks or financial institutions and no fault can be found with the order assessing the rate able value in ..... attention is also drawn in that regard to the provisions of the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 and in particular to section 3 which specifically provides that the said act does not apply to the premises which are let or sub-let to banks and ..... being so, merely because under section 3(1 )(b) of the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 the premises let out to the banks and companies and financial bodies with paid up share capital of rupees one crore or more, that would not justify ignoring the law ..... undoubtedly, section 3(1 )(b) of the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 excludes the applicability of the provisions of the same act to the premises let or sub-let to the banks or corporations or the companies having paid up share capital of rupees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2011 (SC)

National Textile Corp.Ltd. Vs. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad and ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... act 1947 stood repealed by the maharashtra rent control act, 1999 (hereinafter called `the act ..... , (2008) 9 scc 720, this court dealt with the same issue as which of the categories of tenants have been excluded from the operation of the act 1999 and held as under: therefore, we are of the view that on a plain meaning of the word psus as understood by the legislature, it is clear that, india's psus are in the form of statutory corporations, public ..... the respondents/plaintiffs after withdrawal of the suit filed under the act 1947, filed a fresh suit in the small causes court at bombay seeking eviction of appellant and for a decree of mesne ..... an eviction suit against the appellant under the provisions of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 (hereinafter called `the act 1947'). ..... appellant preferred civil revision before the high court of bombay, which has been dismissed vide impugned judgment and order ..... 627 of 2006 to the division bench of the small causes court at bombay on 13.11.2006 which was dismissed by the appellate court by affirming the judgment and decree of the trial court vide judgment and ..... 564 of 2008 passed by the high court of judicature at bombay affirming the judgment and order of the small causes appellate court dated 14.8. ..... of act 1999 are not attracted in the instant case, the suit for eviction was filed before the small causes court at bombay. ..... scc 485 ; municipal corporation of greater bombay & ors. v. ..... by the court of small causes at bombay. 2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1996 (SC)

Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC2797; JT1996(7)SC630; (1997)IILLJ720SC; 1996(6)SCALE303; (1996)5SCC542; [1996]Supp5SCR458

..... it was urged that this provision prescribes a procedure different from the provision for retrenchment under the bombay industrial relations act which is the general law applicable in the state of maharashtra for the retrenchment of workmen; and since it results in unemployment of the employees not continued in service as a result of this exercise of restructure of the units, it violates article 21. ..... economy of the country and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.whereas, the central india spinning, weaving and manufacturing company limited, being an existing company as defined a clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 3 of the companies act, 1956, had been engaged in the manufacture and production of yarn, cloth and paper through its undertaking which was composite textile mill and paper manufacturing unit, styled as the central india spinning, weaving and ..... 183 of 1986 for voluntary winding up under the companies act, 1956 in the bombay high court, on the ground that on account of continuous losses, the company was unable to run and manage the industrial undertaking further. ..... in our opinion, the permissible judicial scrutiny to this extent reveals that the enactment undoubtedly is for effectuating the directive principle in clause (b) of article 39 towards securing that the ownership and control of the undertaking are so utilised as best to subserve the common good. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1996 (HC)

Patan Taluka Muman's Cattle Breeding and Milk Supplying Vs. State of G ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1997)2GLR1238

..... to take those buffaloes to the place in other state as aforesaid, the members of the petitioner-association are required to obtain export permit from the competent authority under the provisions of the bombay essential commodities and cattle (control) act. ..... on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents contended that the demand of export permit of the buffaloes which have been taken back to the state of maharashtra, though brought here as salvage buffaloes for making them non-salvage buffaloes, has a legal sanction behind it. ..... in this petition is also made by the petitioner to the action of the respondents to insist for the permit/export permit when the members of the association sought to take milch buffaloes back from patan taluka, gujarat, to bombay in the state of maharashtra. ..... most of the members of the association have their own stables at goregabn, joeshwari and borivali in the greater bombay in the state of maharashtra. ..... the action of the respondents to demand permit/export permit, while the members of the association take back their salvage buffaloes brought to this state for the purpose of making them milch buffaloes to the state of maharashtra, is illegal and has no legal sanction behind it. ..... . the question which is raised for consideration of this court is whether dry cattle brought within the state of gujarat for salvage purpose and are to be taken back to the state of maharashtra, any export permit is to be obtained or not .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //