Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay industrial relations act 1946 maharashtra section 25 right of officers of approved unions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 9 of about 280 results (1.103 seconds)

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

M/s. Coffee Day Global Limited Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Featherlite Collections Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Karnataka Small Scale Industries Association (kassia) Vs. The Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Akhila Karnataka Federation Of Petroleum Traders - Akfpt (r) Vs. The S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

M/s. Entoma Warehosue Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Grasim Industries Limited Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Mangalore Elecricity Supply Co Ltd Vs. Senior Labour Inspector

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Fine Tech Corporation Private Limited Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Pothys Pvt Ltd Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

M/s Toolcomp Systems Pvt Limited Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //