Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay industrial relations act 1946 maharashtra section 25 right of officers of approved unions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 7 of about 280 results (0.129 seconds)

Dec 06 2017 (HC)

J Somashekar Vs. Lt. Col Appu Ramanand Sharma (Retd)

Court : Karnataka

..... the plaint intending to offer to sell the schedule property to him and accordingly, the defendants entered into an agreement with the plaintiff on 2.9.2008, and the same was registered in the office of the sub-registrar, indiranagar, bangalore for a total sale consideration of rs.1,80,00,000/- and a sum of rs.20,00,000/- was paid on the date of agreement as advance under the cheque and ..... plaintiff has to obtain certified copies of those documents and produce before the court, is contrary to the provisions of section 57 of the registration act and rule144 of the karnataka registration rules 1965 and accordingly, the same are quashed. ..... of order xiii rules 3, 4 and 6 of the code of civil procedure were considered by the full bench of high court of bombay while holding that on being served with the writ of summons, the defendant appears and files written statement under order viii rule 1, the ..... he would further contend that in view of provisions of section 30 of the code of civil procedure, the court may at any time either of its own motion or on the application of any party, make such orders as may be necessary or reasonable in all matters relating to the delivery and answering of interrogatories, the admission of documents and facts, and the discovery, inspection, production, impounding and return of ..... so also in the case of sociedade de fomento industrial limited vs- sita shripad narvekar reported mhlj (2016)2 p.958, where notice issued by the plaintiff under order xii rule 3 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2018 (HC)

Sri Jayaram Vs. Agricultural Produce Marketing

Court : Karnataka

..... bhattacharji and others reported in (1999) 7 scc547while examining the deeming provision of section 3(25) of the bombay industrial relations act, 1946 by which deeming provision, the legislature treated deemed arrears of subscription for three calendar months or even more to be a sufficient disqualification for a person to be continued on the roll of membership of the union for subsequent months, had noticed that said provision having undergone changes from 1965 onwards and while interpreting the words ..... the phraseology employed by the legislature in sections 13 and 16 wherein an applicant union for getting registration as a representative union under section 13 or the rival union to displace such a representative applying under section 16 has to show its requisite 25% membership of the workmen engaged in that industry for a continuous period of three immediately ..... attracted, though looks attractive at first blush, it does not detain this court for too long to brush aside the same, inasmuch as, the expression used in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the act is not three consecutive ordinary meetings but it is more than three consecutive ordinary meetings , which would mean that a sitting member of the market committee would become liable to disqualified, ..... the election officer namely, tahsildar, bangalore north taluk conducted a meeting to elect president and vice president of the committee on 21.10.2014 on account of term of 20 months period fixed under the act was to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2019 (HC)

Shri Mookambika Temple Vs. Mr. Raviraja Shetty

Court : Karnataka

..... place by whatever name called, used as a wa no.1756/2015 place of public religious worship having separate existence and dedicated to or for the benefit of or used as of right by the hindu community or any section thereof as a place of public religious worship and includes a mandira, samadhi, brindavana, gadduge, shrine, sub- shrine, utsav mantapa, tank, paduka- peetha, daivasthana, gudi, ..... bombay high court held that the bombay shops and establishment act, 1948, is primarily a law relating to the shops and establishments in the state of ..... state government may by notification declare to be a commercial establishment for the purposes of this act; x x x 2(i) establishment means a shop or a commercial establishment: x x x 2(u) shop means any premises where any trade or business is carried on or where services are rendered to customers, and includes offices, storerooms, godowns, or warehouses, whether in the same premises or otherwise, used ..... the authorities that the industrial disputes act and the statute relating to shops and ..... management committee of the notified institution/declared institution subject to the approval of the prescribed authority considering the tatte kasu and seva rusum (commission) received by archaka ..... union of india and another, [(2010) 10 scc338 (rajan sandhi), it has been held by the honble supreme court that section 5 of the working journalists act, 1955, which deals with payment of gratuity, being a special law would prevail over section 4(6) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Pointec Pens And Energy Pvt Ltd Vs. The Secretary To Government,

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

M/s Pacific Industries Limited Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Chambers Of Commerce Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Federation Of Karnataka Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. The Secretary Labour Department

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2020 (HC)

Akshara Motors Pvt Ltd Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... payment of minimum wages to the supervisory staff who do not prima facie answer the definition of employee under section 2(e) of the minimum wages act, 1948, subject to the condition that the individual claim, if any, of such employees may be processed u/s 20 of the act, regardless of their designation; and (d) that part which directs the employer to constitute and appoint the competent officer and - 210 - the appellate authority for adjudication of claims/disputes relating to payment of minimum wages. ..... writ appeal no.1520/2019 which is preferred by the union which arises out of the writ petition filed by the said union, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants pointed out that the revised rate of minimum wages notification issued in respect of the textile (silk) industry, spinning mills industry and cloth dying and printing industry were illegally withdrawn. ..... relied upon the decision of the bombay high court in the case of arbuda bhuvan tea shop and others -vs- state of maharashtra and others15.21. ..... we must note that five components laid down by the tripartite committee were approved by the apex court, in its earlier judgment in the case of standard vaccum refining ( ..... he pointed out that the apex court held that though the provisions of the said act of 1948 interfere with the fundamental rights guaranteed under clause (g) of article 19 (1) of the constitution of india, the restrictions imposed therein 3 air1955sc33- 228 - are reasonable and are in the interests of general .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //