Bombay Court Of Wards Act 1905 Maharashtra Section 22 Power Of Court Of Wards To Appoint Guardians Of Certain Government Wards - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay court of wards act 1905 maharashtra section 22 power of court of wards to appoint guardians of certain government wards Page 1 of about 697,725 results (0.537 seconds)Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office (Karnataka), B ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 2003ACJ577; [2002(92)FLR1177]; ILR2002KAR448; 2002(1)KarLJ379; (2002)ILLJ979Kant
Court in Mohamad Ismail Ansari v. Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Bombay, in support of his argument.5. The learned Counsel for the prosecuting his claim before the wrong forum in the ESI Court at the first instance and before this Court at the process of giving interpretation to the provisions in the ESI Act, insofar as the same related to Sections 46 and 2(9) refer to Section 46 of the ESI Act. The said section had occurred in Chapter V under the head 'Benefits'. To such extended period as the Corporation or any officer or authority authorised by it in this behalf may allow. (2) The Act and in that process, as argued by Sri Narayanaswamy, certain part in Regulation 4 of the ESI Regulations, 1950, stand exceed (such amount as may be prescribed by the Central Government) and the claim for such payment shall be made within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaria Philomina Pereira Vs. M/S. Rodrigues Construction a Partnership ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1991Bom27; 1990(2)BomCR77; (1990)92BOMLR164
has further stated that there is no provision under the Bombay Court-fees Act providing for fees payable in such a suit The learned Judge, Bombay City Civil Court, held that that Court had no pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit, of sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Ownership Fiats Act, which imposes, amongst other liabilities, the liability to 'specify in the part of the defendants under the provisions of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management is a 'promoter' within the meaning of clause (c) of Section 2 of the Ownership Flats Aci. The defendants are constructing and order dated 17-7-1989 held that that Court has no jurisdiction and the plaint was ordered to be returned to the the defendants represented that they were the builders on a certain plot of land and the building was to be constructed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindumatiben Chimanlal Desai Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1969Bom423; (1969)71BOMLR340
in land prior to the coming into force of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, it would have fallen under Section the subject-matter of a suit under Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act, the market value of the subject-matter has always the State Government under Section 3 of the Suits Valuation Act. It is conceded that no rules have been framed under Suits Valuation Act in its application to the State of Maharashtra covers Section 6(ix) of the Bombay Court Fees Act. Accordingly, suit land for payment of income-tax due by her husband. Section 4 of the Suits Valuation Act, 1887 provides that such of one Chimanlal Chhotalal Desai who died on or about 22nd January 1965. The defendant No.1 is the Union of India. particular sum of money. It further held that the residuary power to entertain an appeal vests in the High Court not value or a value not below or not exceeding a certain sum ought to have been fixed, it cannot be said by a notification upto a sum of Rs.25,000/-. The State Government has done so. The present jurisdiction of the Bombay City
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmidas N. Madhvani Vs. Madhvani Private Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR308
the plaintiffs. Therefore, Article 7' of Schedule I of the Bombay Court-fees Act would be applicable and the value of the to be brought from the Record Room of the High Court. One or the other side will be without a copy suit which falls under any other provision of the Court-fees Act. Since a suit for declaration that the sale of any Clause (ha) has been placed on the statute book by Maharashtra Act 9 of 1970. After this it is not open (v) and (vi) and Clause (d) of paragraph (xi) of Section 6 of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1939, the Court fees Ltd. (1942) 1 Ch. 235 : (1942) 1 All. E.R. 224.It seems to me that the word 'purchase' cannot with propriety mean that valuation of the property for the purpose of jurisdiction should be one-fourth of the total value.15. In some cases, the plaintiffs is a claim for -a declaration that a certain sale effected by defendant No, 1 in favour of defendant that In re V.G.M. Holding Ltd's case was followed in Governments Stock and Other Securities Investment Co. Ltd. v. Christopher (1956)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.A. Naiksatam Vs. Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court of Bomba ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)140; 2004(4)AWC3738(SC); 2005(5)BomCR476; (2005)ILLJ561SC; 2005(2)MhLj38; 2004(8)SCALE794; (2004)8SCC653; 2005(1)SLJ219(SC)
Bombay High Court (Discipline and Appeal) Rules (for short 'the Bombay rules'), the appellants were entitled to get a copy of day situation of rampant corruption in public life, the High Court rightly imposed the punishment of dismissal on erring officers. In same was dismissed on 26th March, 2000 by the then Acting Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay. Aggrieved by in the case of Yoginath D. Bagde v. State of Maharashtra and Anr., : AIR1999SC3734 , and in paragraph 31 this against the impugned final judgment of the Division Bench dated 22nd December, 1999 of the High Court of Bombay in the The disciplinary authority, if it is not itself the inquiring authority may, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, two appellants.3. An Additional Registrar of the High Court was appointed as an Enquiry Officer. The appellants were given opportunity to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Gujarat Vs. Shantaben
Court: Gujarat
Reported in: AIR1972Guj108; (1972)0GLR170
1932. It would suffice to reproduce the provisions of the Bombay Act of 1959. Section 24 of that Act reads:--'24. The will be governed by the principles applicable while determining the court-fees leviable for probate. In that manner, it may be said underlying Section 19-D (corresponding to Section 24 of the Bombay Act of 1959) and held that the joint family property was letters of administration and therefore the exemption granted by that section is not available to a succession certificate. This contention would Keshavlal's case. 25 Bom LR 1240 = (AIR 1924 Bom 228) (FB) the Bombay legislature when it amended Art. 12 of has been conferred under the Act; and where such a power has been so conferred, whether the power is for the question what would be the position if no executor is appointed under a will and the legatee claims letters of administrations raising of that question notice was issued to the learned Government Pleader to make his submissions on the question because the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Society of Servants of God Vs. Major Hanmantrao Narayanrao Jagtap
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1965)67BOMLR210
Act. Under Sub-section (1) it is provided that in Greater Bombay from a decree or order made by the Court of proceedings are made revisable at an interlocutory stage by the Court to which the appeal lies under the said Sub-section. Under lie to the special Courts of appeal specified in the Act. The further parts of the first proviso, however, take away has relied on Section 29(3) of the Bombay Rent Act. Section 29 of the Rent Act provides for appeals from decrees : AIR1944Cal309 and Babu Ram v. Manohar Lal.) [1938] All. 22.5. It cannot, therefore, be said that the present Civil Revision the Code of Civil Procedure. It is therefore, arguable that power of revision given to the Courts of appeal under the other attributes, of immovable property, such as a declaration that certain land is personal property of the Ruler of any former and came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs' suit was governed by Section 6(iv)(d) read with the third proviso to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSadhu Mahadu Jagdale Vs. Tatya Sadhy Jagdale and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1973Bom91; (1972)74BOMLR712; ILR1973Bom787; 1972MhLJ935
Junior Division, Mohol.3. Paragraph (v) of Section 6 of the Bombay Court-fees Act provides that the amount of fee payable in Explanation to paragraph (vii) of Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act undoubtedly provides that for the purpose of Court-fees under paragraph (v) of Section 6 of the Bombay Court-fees Act. I am afraid I am unable to accept this argument. Suits Valuation Act') in its application to the State of Maharashtra provides that in suits other than those referred to in the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mohol.3. Paragraph (v) of Section 6 of the Bombay Court-fees Act provides that the amount and the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sholapur would have jurisdiction to the exclusion of the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, the Plaintiffs, if the agricultural properties which are assessed to Government revenue are valued at twenty times the survey assessment under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalit J. Patel Vs. T.R. Bhide
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1970)72BOMLR366; 1970MhLJ459
application for refund is made under Section 48(1) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959, (Act XXXVI of 1959), the material part purpose of the present order.4. Section 31(1) of the Indian Court-fees Act, 1870, was construed by a Division Bench of this Vimadalal, J.1. This is an action for dissolution of partnership and for accounts between persons who the first disjunctive clause does not occur at all in Section 43(I) of the Bombay Court-fees Act of 1959. It is By my Order dated August 21, 1969, I revoked the authority of the arbitrator Mr. Divecha, and made an order superseding they did result in a concluded compromise in regard to certain matters which were the subject-matter of the arbitration, whilst according
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishwanath Revansiddappa Lingshetti Vs. Shivshankar Basappa Ningshetti
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1972)74BOMLR714
therefore, seem that the words of Section 14 of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959 and of Section 12 of the Indian Bombay Act does not take away the right of the Court to revise the Court-fees under Sections 8 and 14 of the Court, either under Section 12 of the Indian Court-fees Act, 1870, or under Sections 8 and 14 of the Bombay Sections 8 and 14 of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959. Section 12 provides that every question relating to valuation for the for investigation to ascertain proper valuation. Section 10 provides for powers of persons making inquiry under Sections 8 and 9. Section these three appeals the parties coming in appeal are claiming certain amounts of interest in the settlement of partnership accounts. The
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>