Bituminization - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bituminization Year: 1940 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.003 seconds)Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. Vs. Adkins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-20-1940
..... proscription of unfair trade practices the establishment of marketing rules respecting such sales of bituminous coal constitute regulations within the competence of congress under the commerce clause as stated ..... interstate commerce in coal footnote 5 sec 17 b provides the term bituminous coal includes all bituminous semibituminous and subbituminous coal and shall exclude lignite which is defined as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Socony-vacuum Oil Co., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-06-1940
..... supra is not in point in that case certain producers of bituminous coal created an exclusive selling agency for their coal the ..... by the commission over specified activities of such associations and the bituminous coal act of 1937 50 stat 72 especially 4 and 12 ..... relate to the fixing of minimum and maximum prices by the bituminous coal commission footnote 61 respondents strongly urge that this is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTigner Vs. Texas
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-06-1940
..... stat 456 482 49 u s c 5 8 as to bituminous coal see 4 d pt i of the bituminous coal act of 1937 50 stat 72 77 footnote 5 see .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmerican Federation of Labor Vs. Labor Board
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-02-1940
..... idaho central railroad co 305 u s 177 and in utah fuel co v national bituminous coal comm n 306 u s 56 cf myers v bethlehem shipbuilding corp 303 u .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial