Skip to content


Binding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: binding Sorted by: recent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 454 results (0.065 seconds)
Dec 31 2002 (HC)

V. Goutham Rao Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD681; 2003(1)ALT615

orderb prakash rao j 1 the petitioner herein claiming to be the absolute owner and possessor of the land bearing...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transport Corpora ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: I(2003)ACC553; 2004ACJ801

..... liability could be fastened on it by the petitioner it is further contended that when contractual liability had been excluded the transaction entered into between p ws 1 and 4 and ..... the consequent happening would not be binding upon it on behalf of the second respondent it was contended that the petition filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Global Trust Bank and ors.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

1 sebi is investigating into the affairs relating to buying selling and dealing in the shares of global trust bank...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (TRI)

M.J. Exports Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2004)88ITD18(Mum.)

1 this appeal has been filed by the assessee on 17th october 2000 against the order of the learned commissioner...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (TRI)

N.S. KaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ57CAT

1 applicant impugns his continued suspension resorted to initially by an order dated 19 5 97 and continued through orders...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

Harbans Lal Vs. Amar Nath

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ355

..... the high court was therefore justified in taking the view that those findings have no binding force on the revisional court it was further held that the rule when the courts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

South East Asia Marine Engineering and Construction Ltd. Vs. Oil Natur ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ519

..... for the work done by him the other party contended that there was no valid binding and enforceable contract under which the claim could be made and the courts had very ..... was mandatory and not merely directory or obligatory all contracts contravening the direction were not binding as against the statutory bodies though such contracts may be enforced against the particular officer .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

Jai Bharath Tanners Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)181CTR(Mad)431; [2003]264ITR673(Mad)

..... court were holding the field and the order passed by the assessing officer overlooking the binding decisions of this court is plainly erroneous though the commissioner in his order has not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (TRI)

Dhimant Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT421Tri(Mum.)bai

1 of the appellants before us standard drum manufacturing co and standard drums and buckets co are manufacturers who had...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2002 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. and anr. Vs. Tiruvalluvar Transpor ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2002

Reported in: 2003(1)CTC156; (2003)1MLJ323

..... liability could be fastened on it by the petitioner it is further contended that when contractual liability had been excluded the transaction entered into between p ws 1 and 4 and ..... the consequent happening would not be binding upon it on behalf of the second respondent it was contended that the petition filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //