Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Determination Of Conditions Of Service Of Employees Act 1988 - Judgment Search Results

Process Technicians and Analyst's Union Vs. Union of India and others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC1288; JT1997(4)SC44; (1997)ILLJ1217SC; 1997(2)SCALE670; (1997)10SCC142; [1997]2SCR798

..... also challenged before us 12 the appellant union contends that section 3 of the bharat petroleum corporation limited determination of conditions of service of employees act 1988 confers unguided and arbitrary powers on the central government to frame schemes hence .....

Sri Venkateswara Service Station a registered Firm by its Managing Par ...

Court : Chennai

2002 1 delhi 56 chirag keshaw service station vs the bharat petroleum corpn ltd 2008 56 bjrj 1114 bhatia service station of india article 226 indian contract act 1872 section 201 petroleum act 1934 section 20 section 14 specific relief act 1963 09 2014 the apex court gave liberty to the respondents corporation to take appropriate action in accordance with law 15 so vs 1 the divisional retail sales manager indian oil corporation limited trichy divisional office women sidco industrial estate vazhavanthankottai trichy and 2014 stating that there is no violation of terms and conditions and that they will initiate contempt against the corporation for extract about ron apart from the decisions reported in bhatia service station and another vs indian oil corporation and another 2004 the general or special order by the central government or state government or any officer of the oil company not bellow them and they would not indulge in any other illegal acts 4 the defendants are restrained from cancelling the dealership of

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. Khatanand Alias K. Anand Sara ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2006Chh22; 2006(2)MPHT89(CG)

rs 2 175 and damages against the defendant m s bharat petroleum corporation limited in the court of civil judge class 95 of the memorandum and articles of association of bharat petroleum corporation limited urged that for issuing power of attorney signature suits are instituted or defended on behalf of a public corporation like bank public interest should not be permitted to be on electric construction and equipment co limited v parmali vailes limited reported in 1991 jab lj 45 the court below i after minutely appreciating the material on record in holding the service illegal did not commit any illegality or irregularity 10 during decree may not only support the decree but may also state that the finding against him in the court below in but whether as enumerated under article 123 of the limitation act that will amount to knowledge or not is an important

Workmen of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Refining Division) B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC356; (1984)ILLJ35SC; 1983(2)SCALE736; (1983)4SCC470; [1984]1SCR251; 1984(1)SLJ198(SC); 1984(16)LC8(SC)

scales of junior grade clerical employees of the respondent company bharat petroleum corporation limited are better in the refinery division with of junior grade clerical employees of the respondent company bharat petroleum corporation limited are better in the refinery division with which junior and senior clerical employees in all the oil companies corporations in this country it is seen from that statement that in this appeal then those in the hindustan petroleum corporation limited for the pay scales in the respondent company are rs 5 no suitable machinery is provided in the act for determining the compensation payable to the owner according to s 4 in following this principle to make changes even where the conditions of service of an all india concern are uniform besides marketing division of the company at bombay who had joined service prior to the date of nationalisation in raising the age industry in the past in the matter of retiring its employees these and other relevant facts have to be weighed by judicial legislation 773h nbsp 3 it is open under the act for an authorised officer to requisition any movable property for

ibp Co. Limited Vs. Nand Kishore Bajpai and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT764

as well as the four public sector oil companies namely bharat petroleum corporation limited bpcl hindustan petroleum corporation limited hpcl indian sector oil companies namely bharat petroleum corporation limited bpcl hindustan petroleum corporation limited hpcl indian oil corporation limited iocl and ibp as the four public sector oil companies namely bharat petroleum corporation limited bpcl hindustan petroleum corporation limited hpcl indian oil corporation we are not dealing with any case where ibp company limited had entered into negotiations and decided to appoint dealers for at the same rates and on the same terms and conditions as are herein contained without prejudice to the aforesaid this infrastructure and spent money constructing petrol pumps installing equipments providing service centres etc such expenditures under category i should have been the oil company through the said retail outlet shall be employees of the contractor the agreement specifically mentions that the company in contract licenses etc can successfully indulge in getting welfare activities mandated by directing principles thwarted to further his own interest

M.S. Desai and Co. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1987Guj19; (1987)1GLR375

the central government it was found in that case that bharat petroleum corporation limited satisfied all the aforesaid tests and that procedure prescribed by the central government through the ministry of petroleum which according to mr patel has to be followed by with an almost identical question as to whether bharat petroleum corporation limited was a state within the meaning of art 12 it was found in that case that bharat petroleum corporation limited satisfied all the aforesaid tests and that it was distributing maimudar j 1 a short question falls for determination in this appeal it runs as under can the alleged existence a huge contractual field in which the terms and conditions of the contract are practically dictated by the monopolistic limbs first two viz that the respondent corporation was not a state and that relationship between the parties was that of contracting 226 of constitution of india and section 73 of contract act 1872 central government guidelines not followed by respondent respondent is

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (a Government of India Enterpr ...

Court : Mumbai

applications on 20th november 2009 in which as noted earlier bharat petroleum corporation limited and the petitioner were applicants the member bharat petroleum corporation limited as well as the petitioner hindustan petroleum corporation limited the grievance therefore is that an inconsistent stand petroleum corporation limited as well as the petitioner hindustan petroleum corporation limited the tribunal has observed that the notification cannot apply corporation limited as well as the petitioner hindustan petroleum corporation limited the tribunal has observed that the notification cannot apply to navy or coast guard subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions the tribunal however was of the view that the notification the petitioner is in appeal before the customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal aggrieved by an order of adjudication passed product has been supplied through the installations of indian oil corporation limited which are directly connected to the naval docks through

Badri Prasad Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2006(4)MPHT89(CG)

e that shri kuldeepak verma was very much interested that bharat petroleum should give petrol pump dealership to one of his given to her pratima verma in spite of her bharat petroleum gave chance to a schedule caste woman this also cause the integrity of the sworn statement made by the petroleum corporation the 3rd respondent in connivance with the officers of the bharat petroleum corporation limited the 3rd respondent herein has changed the site and started petition on 3 7 2006 directed notice rule nisi on service of notice returns are filed on behalf of the respondent place on this selected site thus it is incorrect to state that the location has been changed as per the convenience if each and every violation and irregularity in the state action could be subject matter of public interest litigation a substantive

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3277; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)65; 1(2004)BC173(SC); [2003]117CompCas123(SC); (2003)4CompLJ1(SC); 2003(4)CTC237; JT2003(Suppl1)SC515; 2003(7)SCALE491; (2003)7SCC532; [2003]

majority of shares in hindustan petroleum corporation limited hpcl and bharat petroleum corporation limited bpcl to private parties without parliamentary approval of the government to sell majority of shares in hindustan petroleum corporation limited hpcl and bharat petroleum corporation limited bpcl to than the central government or a government company or a corporation owned managed or controlled by the central government shall carry relied upon the decisions of this court in western coalfields limited v municipal council bir singhpur pali and anr 1999 3scc290 submission that the policy underlying a statute has to be determined from a reading of the preamble and that reference to willing to comply or has complied with such terms and conditions as that government may think fit to impose direct by shall be incurred during a financial year on a new service not contemplated in the annual budget for the year except of india has been upheld by this court in balco employees union v union of india 2002 illj550sc that the decision person particularly in the context that the object of the act is that the ownership and control of the petroleum products

Shri Madhusudan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ590

land had been acquired for the use and benefit of bharat petroleum corporation limited hereinafter referred to as bpcl a company public purpose namely expansion of bijwasan oil terminal of bharat petroleum corporation ltd under the planned development of delhi this notification through the records and the requirements of the bharat petroleum corporation ltd and also the draft notification i am fully satisfied acquired for the use and benefit of bharat petroleum corporation limited hereinafter referred to as bpcl a company which had to a of the act for the court to examine and determine these factual controversies as to the utility of the land mere existence of urgency or unforeseen emergency though is a condition precedent for invoking section 17 4 that by itself is binding on the state authorities could be legitimately pressed into service by shri mohta in the facts of this case which subjective satisfaction depending upon any relevant date available to the state authorities at the time when they issued the impugned notification notification under sections 4 6 and 17 1 of the act these records show that a detailed note was prepared on and then notified in the official gazette on 24th september 1988 the stay was granted by the court vide its order