Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1996Mad29
..... be defrayed out of the said fund. section 30 enumerates the various purposes for which the market committee fund may be expended. the act also provides for the establishment of state agricultural marketing board, creation of market board fund, and market development fund and for such other matters relating to the day-today regulation and administration of the market. section 52 empowers the ..... subject rubber falls, within the exclusive purview of the parliament. they further contended that the parliament have enacted rubber act, 1947 (central act xxiv of 1947) and have also constituted the rubber board, all the dealings and transactions on rubber is controlled by the rubber act, 1947 which also authorises the collection of 50 paise per kg. as cess. it has also been contended .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : [1989]74STC56(Ker)
..... on the ground of excessive delegation. it was also pointed out that the levy and collection in accordance with the rules is an important safeguard against the board acting arbitrarily in the matter of collection of duty from the owners of the rubber estates or the manufacturers. when the court referred to levy and collection in the ..... further, in paragraph 9 of the judgment, the court observed:the provision in section 12(2) that the board shall 'levy and collect' the duty in accordance with the rules is another important safeguard against the board acting arbitrarily in the matter of collection of duty from the owners of the rubber estates or the manufacturers.referring to ..... provides for the method of collection as the excise duty can be collected either from the producers or from the manufacturers as defined by the act. the court also held that the board is vitally interested in the collection of duty and it has to see that such duty is collected without undue delay and proper expedition. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : AIR1999Mad100
..... complaint with respect to the use, distribution or control of the waters of, or in, any inter-state river or river valley.' under the provisions of entry 56 of union list, the river boards act, 1956, was enacted for advising the governments interested in relation to such matter concerning the regulation or development ..... for irrigation has paradoxically advised the state governments to resolve their river water disputes through mutual negotiations. it is further contended that even though the central government have enacted the river boards act, 1956, no river board has been set up in pursuance of the act.4. the petitioner states that as per the advance report ..... by entry 17, list ii, schedule vii ofthe constitution.7. the petitioner would submit that the river boards act, 1956, which was enacted by the parliament, authorises, the union government to establish a river board for advising the governments interested in relalion to such matters concerning the regulation or development of an inter .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653
..... interest of larger number of people are thrown to wind very easily, forgetting the commitment that the state made when earlier the repair board act was passed and subsequently the mhad act was passed. it is high time that necessary corrective measures are taken to see to it that public housing of larger number of ..... repair and reconstruction of buildings, for which there existed earlier the above referred separate enactment, namely bombay repairs and reconstruction board act, 1969 which was also repealed by this act amongst others. thus this act was passed as a comprehensive legislation to unify, consolidate and amend the laws relating to housing, repairing and reconstructing dangerous ..... to meet the expenditure in this behalf. the state government therefore came up with the bombay building repairs and reconstruction board act, 1969 which came into force from 31st december, 1969. the act provided for levy of a cess in a particular manner on the tenanted properties in the city of bombay and to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
..... submitted under development control regulation 33(7) of the development control regulations, 1991 (`dcr'). on 14 august 2001, the mumbai building repairs and reconstruction board (`the repair board') the second respondent, granted its no objection for the redevelopment of the property under dcr 33(7). the no objection certificate stipulated that residential ..... came to be issued. in pursuance of a query under the right to information act, 2005, the repair board intimated that a no objection certificate for redevelopment is issued under appendix-iii to dcr 33(7). the repair board stated that since it is responsible for certifying the list of tenants/occupiers, it ..... documentary evidence including the inspection extracts to determine the use. the repair board also conducts a physical verification at site; (ii) in the present case, the repair board has acted on the basis of a complaint which was received. the repair board is justified in re-inquiring into the issue with a view to determine .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
..... submitted under development control regulation 33(7) of the development control regulations, 1991 (`dcr'). on 14 august 2001, the mumbai building repairs and reconstruction board (`the repair board') the second respondent, granted its no objection for the redevelopment of the property under dcr 33(7). the no objection certificate stipulated that residential ..... came to be issued. in pursuance of a query under the right to information act, 2005, the repair board intimated that a no objection certificate for redevelopment is issued under appendix-iii to dcr 33(7). the repair board stated that since it is responsible for certifying the list of tenants/occupiers, it ..... documentary evidence including the inspection extracts to determine the use. the repair board also conducts a physical verification at site; (ii) in the present case, the repair board has acted on the basis of a complaint which was received. the repair board is justified in re-inquiring into the issue with a view to determine .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Reported in : [1990]181ITR387(Ker)
..... entered into correspondence with the assessee. he ascertained the number of trees that were sold, the details of the estates with trees, the details from the rubber board referring to the report of the tariff commission, etc., and thereafter initiated proceedings to reopen the assessments. on the basis of the materials available before it, the ..... old rubber trees (if any) was not brought to tax in the original assessments made. the assessments were reopened under section 147(b) of the income-tax act. the reassessment proceedings were found to be invalid by the appellate assistant commissioner ; but sustained by the appellate tribunal for both the years. it is agreed ..... that the income-tax officer had received information after the date of the original assessment justifying reopening of the assessment under section 147(b) of the income-tax act, 1961 ? (4) was the tribunal justified in its finding that the materials collected and relied upon by the assessing officer for arriving at the market .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (1979)1GLR732
..... this contention is that if the central government is minded to resume any area it has merely to alter the limits under section 5 of the 1908 act, in which case the board will automatically be divested of control over such property and the central government in whom the paramount title vests would assume control. hence there was no ..... rupees two hundred. the miscellaneous provisions are found in chapter xi and section 122 thereof empowers the central government to make rules while section 123 empowers the board to make regulations consistent with the act for any of the matters catalogued in clauses (a) to (o) of that section. the breach of a regulation is made penal by section ..... statute to give a restricted meaning to the word 'vest' in clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 29 of the 1963 act.6. the contention of the board is that before the 1963 act came into force, all the lands and buildings comprising the port of kandla belonged to the central government and by virtue of clause (a) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ1151P& H
..... the presiding officer, labour court, jullundur, 1980 3 serv lr 358.4. in the year 1920 the first trade disputes act was enacted which provided for. courts of inquiry and conciliation board and prohibited strikes in public utility services without one month's notice in writing. a strike intended to cause hardship on ..... but restrains on a lesser fair and concerns for the welfare of legal law.'5. in labour relations board of saskatchewan v. john east iron works ltd., air 1949 pc 129, lord simonds observed:'the act deals with industrial disputes, provides for conciliation, adjudication and settlements, and regulates the rights of the parties ..... industrial dispute. chapter-ii specifies various authorities like works committee, conciliation officers, board of concilation, courts of inquiry, labour courts, tribunals, national tribunals. chapter-iia which consists of sections 9a and 9b was inserted by the industrial disputes (amendment) act no. 36 of 1956. it refers to the requirement of notice before .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... recommendation was not accepted by the syndicate. proviso to section 53 sub-section (7) of the karnataka universities act reads as under:provided that in case of difference of opinion between the syndicate and the board of appointment and, where it is of the opinion that the list does not satisfy the provisions of the ..... consequential order has been passed and submitted that, the university has acted in consonance with the provisions of the karnataka universities act.6. the facts, which are not in dispute, are that, the names of both the petitioners were separately recommended by the board of appointment. it is also not in dispute that the said ..... counsel contended that, under the provisions of the karnataka universities act, if there is any difference between the recommendation made by the board of appointment and the syndicate, under section 53(7) of act, the syndicate has a power to refer the matter back to the board of appointment, however, the syndicate had not referred the matter .....
Tag this Judgment!