Bee Eater - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bee eater Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 3,564 results (0.101 seconds)T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-01-2000
Reported in: 2000(4)SCALE371; (2002)10SCC650
in respect of which penalty and or additional penalty has been levied by the hpc to approach the hpc for reconsideration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDlf Universal Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and anr. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-2000
Reported in: (2000)160CTR(SC)401
from doing so after statement in form 37 i has been furnished therefore to give appropriate meaning to the term agreement
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpring Dale Education Society Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-14-2000
Reported in: (2001)163CTR(P& H)537
regard to every approval of the commissioner that might have been accorded from time to time 9 in surwr enterprises s
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sundram Industries (P) Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-01-2000
Reported in: (2000)164CTR(SC)197; [2001]248ITR179(SC)
orderby the courtthe revenue is in appeal against the judgment of a division bench of the high court at madras...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinnovative Tech Pack Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2000
Reported in: [2001]79ITD445(Delhi)
basis for the period after commencement of production and had been giving a note of account as reproduced above in terms
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPal Properties (i)(P) Ltd. Vs. Ito
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2000
Reported in: [2001]79ITD464(Delhi)
the other hand if cash system is presumed to have been followed in respect of the rent then the event of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaruti Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-25-2000
Reported in: (2000)159CTR(Raj)142
to be quashed 5 on the other hand it has been submitted on behalf of the respondents that a survey was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSita Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. Vs. Assessing Officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-29-2000
Reported in: [2001]79ITD436(Delhi)
department and since the income from the said property had been accepted in subsequent assessment years as business income the same
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarudhara Conductors (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Sep-08-2000
Reported in: (2001)70TTJ(NULL)661
claimed as expenditure he further submitted that such interest has been allowed in the subsequent year in the set aside assessment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAgro Engineering Products Delhi (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2000
Reported in: [2000]244ITR55(Delhi)
the assessing officer imposing penalty of rs 98 694 has been set aside for want of evidence to prove that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial