Becchis Test - Judgment Search Results

Ajay Kumar Mittal Son of Shri Mooll Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

overall marks obtained by a candidate which may include written test interview and physical training in fact the method adopted by

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. General Fibre Dealers Pvt. Lt ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1993)46TTJ(Cal)596

plant the business is carried on that functional aspect or test is very much inherent in tea bush the tea bush

Natco Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)(70)ECC539

that the goods were being cleared after the quality control tests and the entries were never made in the r g

Hemanta Bhattacharjee and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

shall refer then and also simultaneously send the character rolls testimonials of character and service records other relevant records of the

A. Ratnam and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Education Departm ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(6)ALT661

which the g o was issued with this the entrance test preparation of list of eligible candidates and crash course in

Durgacharan Misra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC2267; 64(1987)CLT477(SC); JT1987(3)SC459; 1987LabIC1914; 1987(2)SCALE417; (1987)4SCC646; [1987]3SCR1097; 1987(3)SLJ200(SC); 1987(2)LC657(SC)

qualifying marks prescribed by the commission in the viva voce test in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the commission

M/s. SRF Ltd. Vs. Customs, Excise and Service Tax and Another

Court: Chennai

standard of 210 denier with 4 variance as the last test report is of the value 212 1 denier he further

The Corporate Manager Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

and cons of the policy or to scrutinize it and test wa nos 776 2014 amp 780 2014 amp connected writ

Amrit Banaspati Company Ltd. Vs. Suraj Industries Ltd.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1996HP70

or by their microscopic examination but from their purely visual test seen as a whole on first impression the salient feature

Glickman Vs. Wileman Brothers and Elliott, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

same is premised upon no particular advertisement but rather upon testimony by respondents executives concerning their general opposition to paying for