Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bangalore palace acquisition and transfer act 1996 chapter 1 preliminary Court: allahabad Page 6 of about 62 results (0.107 seconds)

Subhash Chandra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1150

..... it does not necessarily mean that the person must be holding office as a judge at the time of his appointment.43. in the case of secretary, regional transport authority, bangalore and anr. v. d. p. sharma and anr., air 1989 sc 509 (para 15), court observed : '.................in our opinion, whether the expression 'has been' occurring in a provision of a .....

Committee of Management, Shri Mohan Singh Inter College Through Its Ma ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2007]289ITR224(All)

S.N. Srivastava, J.1. Although the facts of all the above writ petitions are at variance and the writ petitions aforesaid have been preferred for reliefs distinct from each other but the common question in the foreground relating to propriety of self examination system in the High School and Intermediate examinations conducted by the U.P. Board of High School and Intermediate constituted under the Intermediate Education Act, 1920 crystallizing from the facts on record, the submissions advanced across the bar and also the materials available on record of which cognizance has been taken by the Court, has necessitated their being tagged together for composite hearing.1. Writ Petition No. 7339 of 2006- This writ petition has been preferred by the Committee of management Sri Mohan Singh Inter College canvassing the validity of the order dated 22.12.2005 whereby the result of number of students was withheld. It would transpire from the record that the result of various students of the colleg...

Jagdish Saran Vs. Ixth Addl. District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2592

..... respondent and the petitioner, his son, set upon a clever adventure by abuse of the process of the court. the petitioner filed a suit before the fourth additional first munsif, bangalore, for a declaration that the order of eviction, which had been confirmed right up to the high court and resisted by the 2nd respondent throughout, was one obtained by 'fraud .....

National Capital Power Station and anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2003All360; III(2003)BC331; (2003)2UPLBEC1543

..... impeller temporarily in lieu of stainless steel impeller (to be replaced by the contractor with stainless steel impeller by 31.12.86. we, canara bank, having our head office at bangalore-560 002 and branch at f-19, cannaught circus, new delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'bank' which expression shall unless repugnant to the context or meaning thereof (include its .....

Musammat Duega Kunwar Vs. Musammat Chunna Kunwar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 78Ind.Cas.633

Mukerji, J.1. The plaintiff in the Court of first instance is the appellant here. She brought this suit for recovery of certain property on the following allegations. Raj Bahadur and Kunwar Bahadur were two first paternal cousins. Raj Bahadur was the sole owner of the property in dispute. In the life time of Raj Bahadur there was a litigation between him and Kunwar Bahadur in which Kunwar Bahadur lost. On the death of Raj Bahadur, however, Kunwar Bahadur again laid claim to his property. The dispute was referred to three arbitrators on the 15th of August 1895 and they made an award the next day. (This is a registered document and a copy of which is on the record). By this document Kunwar Bahadur was to remain in possession of the property as a trustee for the plaintiff and was to pay her a certain amount of maintenance. On the death of Kunwar Bahadur the plaintiff became entitled to the possession of the property. But in his life-time, Kunwar Bahadur made a transfer and his transferees...

Vineet Kumar S/O Sri Veer Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Amit Kumar S/O S ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3891

Vinod Prasad, J.1. Vineet Kumar the revisionist is aggrieved by the two orders of even date 19.12.2003 passed by II Additional Sessions Judge, (Court No. 5) Bijnor in Criminal Misc. Application No. 8 of 2003 State v. Amit Kumar, declaring the accused respondent No. 2 Amit Kumar to be a juvenile under Section 14 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and protection of 1 Children) Act 2000 and granting him bail in S.T. No. 337 of 2002 Under Section 302, 34, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Dehat district Bijnor vide his Bail Application No. 1421 of 2003, Amit Kumar verus State, for the said offences.2. Prelude to the whole proceedings lies in a FIR (annexure No. 1) lodged by the revisionist Vineet Kumar on 4.4.2002 at 11.15 a.m. in respect of the murder of his brother Vinay Kumar alias Neetu, by Spade on the same day at about 9.30 a.m. by accused Amit Kumar respondent No. 2 alongwith Brijesh and Baljor as his socio criminises. The FIR of the revisionist was registered as Crime No. 116 of 2002 Under ...

V.V.S. Alloys Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

..... . the other case laws are also not applicable here. it will be sufficient to mention here that the said case deal with issuance of notice under s. 269d meant for acquisition of property. not only the phraseology of the said section is different, the scope also of the said section is altogether different from s. 148/158bc.31. all these aspects ..... analysis of the said opinion, we find that it comes directly in conflict with the view expressed by the hon'ble allahabad high court in the case of banarasi silk palace vs. cit (1964) 52 itr 220 (all), a case which has been listed at the footnote of p. 1216 itself. the relevant portion appears at p. 230 of the said .....

Dr. A.K. Bansal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)73ITD49(All.)

..... to which such legislature has power to make laws. (2) the matters referred to in clause (1) are the following, namely :- (d) land reforms by way of acquisition by the state of any estate, as defined in article 31a or of any rights therein or the extinguishment of modification of any such rights or by way of ceiling ..... search and can satisfy itself with regard to the authorisation having been issued in accordance with law. my aforesaid view is supported by the decision of income-tax appellate tribunal, bangalore, in case of microland ltd.'s case (supra) and of hon'ble jurisdictional high court of allahabad in the case of p. n. mishra - writ petition no ..... appellate authority could not have any jurisdiction over it.9. during the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the assessee had relied upon the decision of the bangalore bench in the case of microland ltd. (supra) and in reply the learned senior standing counsel had submitted that the direction of the tribunal to place before them .....

Vishwanath Prasad Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)86ITD516(All.)

..... in accordance with the procedure prescribed under section 158bc but the authorities below must have mentioned somewhere that it was a case under section 158bd. the income-tax appellate tribunal, bangalore bench, in the matter of microland v. asstt.cit[1998] 67 itd 446 has held : all the papers on record were merely in the name of "p". therefore, as there .....

U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board, Allahabad Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

..... supersede statutory rules. 25. in union of india vs. hansoli devi and others (2002) 7 scc 273 a constitution bench clarified section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894 in holding that the dismissal of an application seeking reference under section 18 on the ground of delay would tantamount to not filing an application within the ..... meaning of section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894. the supreme court in para-9 clarified the legal position in respect of the powers of the court to interpret the legal position as follows:- "9 ..... of an application seeking reference under section 18 on the ground of delay would tantamount to not filing an application within the meaning of section 28-a of the land acquisition act, 1894." 28. without amending the act, the legislature sought to overreach the decision in satish kumar by adding section 13 (5) to the rules of .....