Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bangalore palace acquisition and transfer act 1996 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 3,169 results (0.526 seconds)

M/S Evershine Monuments Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... determination of compensation and matters connected therewith and is a general enactment, the object and purpose of the bda act is for planned development of bangalore metropolitan area and acquisition of land under sections 17 and 19 of the bda act by issuance of preliminary and final notifications is incidental which is for the purpose ..... taken possession. however, the notification also came to be issued on 07.05.1985 notifying the land under section 16 (2) of the land acquisition act by the - 118 - bangalore development authority notifying the property having being vested.5. i submit that, the vesting of the property by virtue of the series of notification referred ..... affidavit- read as however, the notification also came to be issued on 07.05.1985 notifying the land under section 16(2) of the land acquisition act by the bangalore development authority notifying the property having being vested . as such the plaintiffs cannot contend that the such vesting is only a paper declaration. in .....

Sri. L. Ramareddy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... , determination of compensation and matters connected therewith and is a general enactment, the object and purpose of the bda act is for planned development of bangalore metropolitan area and acquisition of land under sections 17 and 19 of the bda act by issuance of preliminary and final notifications is incidental which is for the purpose of ..... a public purpose or for the benefit of companies, whereas the object and scheme of the bda act is to have planned development of bangalore metropolitan area and in that regard acquisition of land under the bda act read with the provisions of the la act, 1894 is only incidental to and not the primary object ..... but an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority to facilitate and ensure a planned growth and development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and - :32. :- acquisition of lands, if any, therefore is merely incidental thereto. in pith and substance the act is one which will squarely fall under, and .....

Sri B S Yedd Yurappa, Former Chief Minister of Karnataka Vs. the State ...

Court : Karnataka

..... layout. it is also alleged that pursuant to passing of the award the possession of the land was taken and the notification under section 16(2) of karnataka land acquisition act was published on 5.8.2000. the saira education society had applied for allotment of a civic amenity site in aecs layout, kundalahalli. under the allotment letter ..... this petition with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail in special cc no. 136/11 (cch no.24) pending on the file of the learned special judge, bangalore urban district, bangalore. 2. the complaint made by the 2nd respondent came to be registered in. p c r no.3/2011 on the file of the special judge under chapter ..... extracted herein below: i) instance no.l- illegal de-notification of land measuring 2 acres 5 guntas in sy.no.81 /3 of arakere village, kasaba hobli, bangalore south taluk and subsequently purchased by persons as benamidars of the family members it is alleged in the complaint that under the preliminary and final notifications dated 08.09.1987 .....

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... aforesaid writ petitions, stayed further proceedings vide order dated 15.9.1989, initiated pursuant to the aforesaid notification and declaration. thereafter, an ordinance by name, 'bangalore palace acquisition and transfer ordinance, 1992 (hereinafter called 'the ordinance') was promulgated, which was, however, not assented to by the president.7. after the arguments of the ..... it transpired that the presidential assent in terms of proviso to clause (2) to article 254 had been obtained. the records reveal that after the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) ordinance, 1992 was approved by the. cabinet, it was sent to the ministry of home affairs, new delhi on 13.5.1992 to ..... .1996, 20.7.1996 and 26.8.1996, the ministry of home affairs was requested to obtain and communicate the assent of the president to the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) bill, 1996. on 26.9.1996, the director (judicial), ministry of home affairs, sought further information from the state government, which .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2002Kant365

..... state legislature in order to meet certain objections raised in the present proceedings, regarding workability of the act has passed the roerich and devikarani roerich estate (acquisition and transfer) (amendment) act, 2001 inserting section 19a which provides for disbursement of amount to the owners, transferees and other interested persons. the said ..... except section 8, shall not be exempted from any provisions of the act.6. consequent upon issuance of the above notification, the assistant commissioner, bangalore division, bangalore, issued show cause notice dt. 28-3-1994 (annexure 'e') to the petitioner company requiring it to explain as to why the lands measuring ..... so far as immovable properties are concerned, details thereof are as under :--details of lands held by mrs. devikarani roerich and dr. s. roerich in bangalore south taluk known as tataguni estatename of villagename of hoblisy. no.extent in acresextent in hectares grosskharabnetgrosskharabnet'i. land held by smt. devika rani(1) .....

K.T. Plantation Private Limited and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002(6)KarLJ27

..... legislature in order to meet certain objections raised in the present proceedings, regarding workability of the act has passed the roerich and devikarani roerich estate (acquisition and transfer (amendment) act, 2001 inserting section 19-a which provides for disbursement of amount to the owners, transferees and other interested persons. the ..... except section 8, shall not be exempted from any provisions of the act.6. consequent upon issuance of the above notification, the assistant commissioner, bangalore division, bangalore, issued show-cause notice dated 28-3-1994 (annexure-e) to the petitioner-company requiring it to explain as to why the lands measuring ..... so far as immovable properties are concerned, details thereof are as under.--details of lands held by mrs. devikarani roerich and dr. s. roerich in bangalore south taluk known as tataguni estate s.i. no.name ofvillagename ofhoblisy. no.extent in acresextent in hectaresgrosskharab netgrosskharabneti. landheld by smt. devikarani(1) .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt Meenakshi Devi Avaru

Court : Karnataka

..... wealth-tax on them during the said assessment years.17. the preamble, sections 4, 5 and section 8 of the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 are quoted below for ready reference:- the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 (first published in the karnataka gazette, extraordinary, dated 18th november, 1996) (received the ..... another 40/113 smaller portions held in the hands of these five assessee sisters, the total valuation cannot exceed ````11.00 crores fixed by the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 itself which does not envisage any determination of compensation on the basis of the market value of the assets and ..... that only protective assessments have been made by the assessing authorities awaiting the final decision from the hon ble apex court as to whether the bangalore palace (acquisition and transfer) act, 1996 itself is constitutionally valid or not. a clear position about the ownership would then emerge for the respondent assessees .....

Somasundaram Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd,. Owners of Somasundaram Super Spi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC364; (2000)ILLJ340Mad

..... , the petitioner, namely, somasundaram corporation (private limited), owners of somasundaram super spinning mills are challenging the constitutional validity of the somasundaram super spinning mills (acquisition and transfer) act (the tamil nadu act 81 of 1986) as invalid and ultra vires of the constitution of india.3. east ramnad district national textile ..... vesting sugar undertakings set out in the schedule to the ordinance in the u.p. state sugar corporation ltd, subsequently, by uttar pradesh sugar undertakings (acquisition) act, 1971, the ordinance was repealed and was replaced. schedule to the act enumerates 12 sugar undertakings and by the operation of section 3, ..... the things because the idr act is essentially concerned with the control over the management of the industrial undertakings in declared industries. by the acquisition under the impugned act and vesting of the scheduled undertakings in the corporation the scheduled undertakings will nevertheless be under the control of the .....

G. Mahadevappa and Sons and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant294; ILR1996KAR2934; 1996(7)KarLJ402

..... 4) for a further direction to the 2nd respondent to adjudicate the claim and disburse the amounts as per the provisions of the karnataka co-operative textile mills (acquisition and transfer) act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'); (5) and also for a direction to the 3rd respondent provident fund commissioner to withdraw ..... . moreover, third party interests created in the meantime are also likely to be affected and such third parties are not impleaded.the relief of quashing the acquisition proceedings having become inappropriate due to the subsequent events, the grant of a modified relief, considered, appropriate in the circumstances, would be the proper course ..... deposit is made with the commissioner; (2) for a declaration that the notice of demand dated 31st may, 1990, issued by the regional provident fund commissioner, bangalore (hereinafter referred to as the 'provident fund commissioner), the copy of which has been produced as annexure-g, as illegal and void; (3) for a direction .....

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... had been acquired.119. he further submitted that the theory of incidental encroachment cannot have any application in this case, vis a vis acquisition is concerned.120. he further submitted that the decision of offshore holdings pvt. ltd. vs. bangalore development authority & ors. reported in (2011) 3 scc 139 has no application.121. the supreme court was dealing with development scheme under ..... the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (bda act).section 36 of the bda act reads as follows :36. provisions applicable to the acquisition of land otherwise than by agreement.-(1) the acquisition of land under this act otherwise than by agreement within or without the .....