Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bangalore city civil court act 1979 section 2 definitions Page 10 of about 17,191 results (0.439 seconds)

Sri.s.jayaram, Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... rendering or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... concept of demand and acceptance being sine qua non for any proceeding to be initiated under section 7 of the act need not detain this court for any further interpretation as the apex court in plethora of judgments has considered this aspect and has rendered its imprimatur to the said concept ..... clause (c) provides that in case of any other person who comes within the definition of public servant, previous approval of the competent authority to remove him from office at the time when the offence alleged to have been committee should ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all er1222 .....

Sri.b.l. Keshava Murthy, Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... rendering or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... concept of demand and acceptance being sine qua non for any proceeding to be initiated under section 7 of the act need not detain this court for any further interpretation as the apex court in plethora of judgments has considered this aspect and has rendered its imprimatur to the said concept ..... clause (c) provides that in case of any other person who comes within the definition of public servant, previous approval of the competent authority to remove him from office at the time when the offence alleged to have been committee should ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all er1222 .....

Bhojaraja S.n. Vs. Karnataka Lokayuktha Police

Court : Karnataka

..... the respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... rendering or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... concept of demand and acceptance being sine qua non for any proceeding to be initiated under section 7 of the act need not detain this court for any further interpretation as the apex court in plethora of judgments has considered this aspect and has rendered its imprimatur to the said concept ..... clause (c) provides that in case of any other person who comes within the definition of public servant, previous approval of the competent authority to remove him from office at the time when the offence alleged to have been committee should ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all er1222 .....

Narasimhamurthy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... rendering or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... concept of demand and acceptance being sine qua non for any proceeding to be initiated under section 7 of the act need not detain this court for any further interpretation as the apex court in plethora of judgments has considered this aspect and has rendered its imprimatur to the said concept ..... clause (c) provides that in case of any other person who comes within the definition of public servant, previous approval of the competent authority to remove him from office at the time when the offence alleged to have been committee should ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all er1222 .....

Anantha R. Hegde Vs. Capt. T.S. Gopalakrishna

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas312(Kar); ILR1996KAR2267; 1996(3)KarLJ445

..... in view of the same, some of the petitioners filed original suits before the city civil court, bangalore, for a declaration that the notice convening the extraordinary general meeting on april 8, 1995, is illegal and for other reliefs. ..... the suits are pending consideration before the city civil court, bangalore. ..... 10348 of 1995, on the file of the city civil judge, bangalore, for a declaration that the notice convening the extraordinary general meeting of the stock exchange by defendants nos. ..... capital, by such of the requisitionists as represent either a majority in value of the paid-up share capital held by all of them or not less than one-tenth of such of the paid-up share capital of the company as is referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (4), whichever is less; or (c) in the case of a company not having a share capital, by such of the requisitionists as represent not less than one-tenth of the total voting power of all the members of the company referred to in clause (b) of sub ..... it is also clear that the affidavits filed in the civil court are not required to be filed under section 169 of the act, and these affidavits are filed for the purpose of the suit, if any offence is committed, it is against the court and hence the court has to take action. ..... the registrar of companies who is the administrative authority on the administration of the company law in the state karnataka came to the definite conclusion that there is no valid requisition under law. ..... satya [1979] crl. .....

Sree Rama Mandira Trust, Bangalore Vs. T. Manisharappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1983Kant6; ILR1982KAR837; 1982(1)KarLJ417

..... directed against an order dated 15-10-81 of the xii additional city civil judge, bangalore city, in l.a.c.no.155 of 1981 pending on his file.2 ..... but, as already stated, in the instant case the land acquisition officer had referred the matter under section 30 to the court only because a dispute had arisen in the matter of payment of compensation and that that dispute had arisen on this petitioner putting forward its claim also to the ..... is a reference made to the court below under section 30 of the land acquisition act, 1894, as amended by the karnataka act 17 of 1961 (the 'act').3. ..... been registered as no.94/80-81 dated 9-7-1980 book no.234 vol 8.under the circumstances explained above, i hold that the property is under dispute and order to deposit the entire amount of compensation in the civil court under ss. ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner that the land acquisition officer had made the reference under section 30 at the instance of his client and therefore his client was entitled to be heard by the court to which reference has been made. ..... learned single judge has stated that the court in a reference 'cannot implead a person, who never appeared before the land acquistion officer and did not figure as a claimant before him, for the first time after reference under section 30'. ..... a reference under section 30 of the act is required to be made by the land acquisition officer only if there were to arise before him any dispute as to the apportionment or payment of the compensation amount .....

Smt. Chinnamma and ors. Vs. the Devanga Sangha and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1973Kant338; AIR1973Mys338

..... bangalore, and was later on transferred to the file of the learned civil judge under the provisions of the mysore civil courts act. ..... communicated about the said resolution executed the deed of gift in favour pf the president and secretary of the plaintiff as representing the plaintiff on 28.12.1960 and the same was registered in the office of the sub-registrar, bangalore city on the same day; that on completing the gift of the schedule property in the above manner, she placed in the hands of the secretary of the plaintiff a signed receipt issued by the sub-registrar authorising the plaintiff ..... and donee stood in such a position that the donor was able to dominate over the will of the donee and whether the donor utilised the said position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other section 16(2) of the contract act provides a special presumption that in cases falling under clauses (a) and (b) thereof, a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate over the will of the other. ..... it is well to remember here the observations of the supreme court in paragraph 25 in ladli parshad's case : [1964]1scr270 that the reason for the rule in the third sub-section in section 16 is that a person who has obtained an advantage over another by dominating his will may also remain in a position to suppress the requisite evidence in support of the plea of undue influence. .....

SirajIn Basha Vs. B.S. Yediyurappa

Court : Karnataka

..... city civil and sessions judge, bangalore city wherein the learned judge has ordered to issue summons to the accused persons 1 to 15 for the offences punishable under sections 13(1)(d), 13(1)(e) r/w 13(2) of p.c. ..... on a bare perusal of the averments made in the complaint and the order under challenge, i prima facie find that if only the court below had applied its mind to the ingredients of the offences enumerated under sections 420, 463, 466, 468, 471 ipc and sections 3 and 4 of the karnataka land (restriction on transfer) act, 1981, the court below probably would not have come to the conclusion that it was a case fit for issue of process in respect of those ..... (this writ appeal is filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961 praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.37573/2011 dated 30/09/2011. ..... the learned single judge before whom the said matter was listed, in exercise of the power conferred on him under section 8 and 9 of the high court act, 1961, wanted the said writ petitions to be considered by a bench consisting of larger number of honble judges than one and thus referred the matter to the honble chief justice to take a decision in the matter. .....

K. Susheela Vs. Bangalore Mahanagara Palike and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1542

..... 2 on the basis of the revenue inspector's report dated 3.3.2003 initiated proceedings, and ultimately cancelled the katha made in favour of the petitioner.section 114a of the act reads as under:-'where the commissioner either suomoto or otherwise, after such enquiry as he considers necessary is satisfied that any transfer of title under section 114 was got recorded in the corporation register by fraud, misrepresentation or suppression of facts or by furnishing false, incorrect or incomplete material, he ..... 47 situated in byrasandra village, 57/60th division of bangalore city corporation, measuring 40' x30' was purchased by the petitioner under a registered sale ..... admittedly as per annexure-f, the bangalore city corporation has transferred katha in favour of the petitioner in ..... same property by a sale deed dated 17.11.1999, it is for the parties to approach the competent civil court for appropriate relief in accordance with law. ..... that the impugned order at annexure j is liable to be quashed and restore the katha endorsement made in favour of the petitioner as per annexure-f with an observation that the parties may approach the appropriate civil court for appropriate relief.11. ..... to civil court and ..... manjunath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as per section 114a of the act, the commissioner of corporation will have to exercise the power of review within the period of three years from the date of such recording of transfer of title to reopen the case and pass .....

Shyamsunder D. Chugh Vs. Ram Narayan

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2036

..... . judge, courts of small causes,bangalore city-do-18.5.9429.5.944.judge, court of small causes, mysoremysore25.4.94 & 28.5.9412.5.94 29.5.945.1 addl.civil judge & cjm, mysore-do-13.5.9427.5.94 part - ii in exercise of the powers conferred under clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 21 of the karnataka small causes courts act, 1964 the vacation judges of courts of small causes are hereby directed to dispose of urgent civil matters in which injunction, stay of proceedings and attachment orders etc; are sought for during the summer vacation of 1994 ..... . xxx xxx xxx part ii of the second notification reads as- 'in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (3) of section 28 of the karnataka civil courts act, 1964, the vacation district judge/vacation civil judges are directed to dispose of urgent civil matters in which injunction, stay of proceedings and attachment orders etc ..... . mahmad hussain sab, this court while considering the provisions of section 28 of the karnataka civil courts act, 1964 and the relevant notification issued by the high court has observed thus:'6 ..... .' therefore, the exercise of the powers by the vacation courts, as laid down by latter portion of section 28(3)(b) of the karnataka civil courts act, is regulated by the high court notification .....