Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bangalore city civil court act 1979 section 2 definitions Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 271 results (0.207 seconds)

Ved Parkash Garg Vs. Seema

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1988P& H75

..... vijayalakshmi's ease (air 1981 sc 1143)(supra), and the decision of this court in sakow industries case (air 1976 punj & har 321)(supra); transferred the proceedings initiated by the husband from the court of the city civil judge, bangalore, to the court of the chief judge, city civil court, hyderabad, under s. ..... 23(3) of the code section 23 of the code reads as under:'to what court applications lie:--(1) where the several courts having jurisdiction are subordinate to the same appellate court, an application under s. ..... 13 could not be transferred under the said provisions of the act to the court at delhi and therefore, the question of staying the proceedings there in under s. ..... seema, seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty and desertion, has been stayed under section 10, civil procedure code, 1908 . ..... ' thus, sub-section (3) provides for the situations where two courts have the jurisdiction to try the petitions and are subordinate to different high courts. ..... 9 filed earlier by the wife was pending so that both the petitions could be decided simultaneously by one court.according to the learned counsel, this court has ample powers to transfer the proceedings pending in the court at jind, in haryana, to the court at delhi, under s. ..... , 3, 1986, whereby the petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act. ..... pritam singh, 1979 hindu lr 86(punj & har). .....

Kultar Singh Vs. V.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... recently in bangalore city cooperative housing society ltd.v.state of karnataka and others 2012 (3) r. c.r. ..... additional marks to the students, who had passed middle and matriculation examination from the schools of rural areas, but the fact remains that full bench of this court in abhishek rishi's case (supra).subsequently while over-ruling the judgment of division bench of this court in sudesh rani's case (supra).held that award of additional marks to the candidates having passed 10th and 12th standard examination from the schools situated in rural ..... rishi's case (supra).which was pronounced on 3.4.2013, hence, the selections do not deserve to be set aside on that ground, as the action of the authorities at that time was strictly in terms of the law laid down by this court in sudesh rani's case (supra).it was further submitted that even if the petitioners are awarded five additional marks, they still do not come within the zone of selection. ..... ) 497: 2012 air sc1395 the supreme court has upheld the quashing of the notifications under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 on the ground that there was no useful scheme approved by the state government prior to the issue of notifications. ..... state of u.p.1997(2) sct381 m/s raymond ltd.v.m.p.electricity board, 2001(1) rcr (civil) 330, somaiya organics (india) ltd.and another v. ..... state of haryana 2002(2) rcr (civil) 450, m.a.murthy v. ..... (civil) 779: 2012(3) recent apex judgments (r.a.j. .....

Rajwinder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... recently in bangalore city cooperative housing society ltd.v.state of ..... ) 497: 2012 air sc1395 the supreme court has upheld the quashing of the notifications under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 on the ground that there was no useful scheme approved by the state government ..... the relevant paras thereof are extracted below: the contention raised by learned counsel for the respondents that judgment of full bench of this court in kumar manoj 2014.02.13 09:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.4780 of 2011 [3].abhishek rishi's case (supra) should be taken to be laying down law for prospective application ..... of punjab and others.decided on 30.1.2014, wherein it was opined that firstly there is no observation made by the full bench of this court in abhishek rishi's case (supra) that it will have prospective application which is a device innovated to avoid re-opening of settled issues and ..... the issue sought to be raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, namely, that judgment of full bench of this court in abhishek rishi's case (supra) has to be applied prospectively and for the selection process, which was initiated prior in time, this court can direct award of five additional marks for having passed middle and matric examination from the schools situated in the rural areas in terms of the ..... m/s raymond ltd.v.m.p.electricity board, 2001(1) rcr (civil) 330, somaiya organics (india) ltd.and another ..... (2) rcr (civil) 450, ..... (civil) 779 .....

Dalbir Singh and Another Vs. V.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... there are total 11 adarsh schools in the state of punjab, out of which nine are located in malwa region and out of that, five are in muktsar sahib, hence, the view taken by this court on the earlier occasion that many of the candidates belong to that area, hence, there may be some arbitrariness in the process of selection, deserves re-consideration for the reason that selections were meant primarily for ..... recently in bangalore city cooperative housing ..... and expectation of the framers of the constitution that after independence every citizen will get equal opportunity in the matter of employment or appointment to any office under the state and members of civil services would remain committed to the constitution and honestly serve the people of this country have been belied by what has actually happened in last four decades. ..... air sc1395 the supreme court has upheld the quashing of the notifications under sections 4(1) and 6(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 on the ground that there was no useful scheme approved by the state government prior to the ..... cases have also been filed with the complaints that recruitment to the higher strata of civil services made by the public service commissions have been affected by the virus of spoils system in different dimensions and selections have been made for considerations other ..... board, 2001(1) rcr (civil) 330, somaiya organics ( ..... haryana 2002(2) rcr (civil) 450, m. ..... worst when it comes to appointment to lower strata of the civil services. ..... civil) .....

“after Careful Consideration of the Facts and Vs. State of Haryana a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 10 scc, 656 and bangalore city cooperative housing society limited vs. ..... above scale would be payable by the allottee; iv) the benefit of allotment of a residential plot in this category would be admissible only if the acquired residential house/ structure was self-occupied and was in existence on the date of issue of section 4 notification, and further subject to the condition that such residential house had not been constructed by way of any encroachment on the public/ community/ government land. ..... , learned counsel submits that admittedly the petitioners have constructed their residential houses and have been living there for more than one decade and their structures were found in existence before issuance of section 4 notification, such structures deserve to be released from acquisition in terms of the state's own policy dated 26.10.2007 as amended from time to time. ..... respectively as well as of the award dated 20.06.2012 made under section 11 of the act whereby the land along with their residential houses is said to have been acquired. [2].. ..... in the absence of specific pleadings or material on record, it may not be expedient for us to express any definite views on this plea. ..... it is claimed that the constructions raised by petitioners or other residents of the locality are totally illegal and unauthorized as noticed by the hon'ble supreme court in the following order dated 21.03.1997 (relevant extracts only) passed in slp [civil]. .....

Present: Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana Sr. Advocate with Vs. Central Bureau of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , ia no.711 of 2012 in cc no.2008/2004 filed in the court of xxxvi additional city civil & sessions judge, bangalore; 24.2. ..... instituted on a police report, the magistrate shall without delay furnish to the accused, free of cost, a copy of each of the following:- (i) the police report; (ii) the firs.information report recorded under section 154; (iii) the statements recorded under sub- section (3) of section 161 of all persons whom the prosecution proposes to examine as its witnesses, excluding therefrom any part in regard to which a request for such exclusion has been made by the police officer under ..... in the instant criminal revision, the petitioner has impugned order dated 02.02.2013 passed by learned special judge, cbi court, chandigarh in a case fir not rcac22008a004 dated 28.08.2008, under sections 11 and 12 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the pc act . ..... there is no dispute regarding the proposition of law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in lallan rai's case (supra).it is settled law that it is the statutory provisions which govern the trial and the court has to act in accordance with the provisions of section 207 of the code. ..... petitioner is that in the fir in question, final report has been submitted by the cbi and the sanction has been crr no.618 of 2013 (o&m) 3 accorded vide order dated 01.03.2011 for prosecution of the petitioner under section 11 of the pc act and the other offences. .....

State of Haryana Vs. Shanti Parshad and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... we are, therefore, inclined to think, as presently advised, that by necessary implication the power of the civil court to take cognizance of the case under section 9 cpc stands excluded, and a civil court has no jurisdiction to go into the question of the validity or legality of the notification under section 4 and declaration under section 6, except by the high court in a proceeding under article 226 of the constitution. ..... by necessary implication, the power of the civil court to take cognizance of the case under section 9 cpc stands excluded and a civil court has no jurisdiction to go into the question of the validity or legality of the notification under section 4, declaration under section 6 and subsequent proceedings except by the high court in a proceeding under article 226 of the constitution. ..... the plaintiff invoked the jurisdiction of the civil court primarily with the grievance that they were not given any opportunity of hearing to the objections filed by the plaintiffs under section 5-a of the act in pursuance of the notification under section 4 of the act. ..... narayan, (2006) 8 scc 336.which arose under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 and which was similar to the case on hand, this court held that a civil suit is not maintainable to challenge the acquisition proceedings . ..... aggrieved against the said order of the learned single bench, the plaintiffs filed lpa nos.334 and 335 of 1977 which were dismissed on 11.10.1979. .....

“1. Whether the Order of Acquisition Passed by the Land Vs. Ralu and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... on going through the entire proceedings initiated under the land acquisition act, this court held as under:- 3 .we, are, therefore, inclined to think, as presently advised, that by necessary implication the power of the civil court to take cognizance of the case under section 9 cpc stands excluded, and a civil court has no jurisdiction to go into the question of the validity or legality of the notification under section 4 and declaration under section 6, except by the high court in a proceeding under article 226 of the constitution. ..... by necessary implication, the power of the civil court to take cognizance of the case under section 9 cpc stands excluded and a civil court has no jurisdiction to go into the question of the validity or legality of the notification under section 4, declaration under section 6 and subsequent proceedings except by the high court in a proceeding under article 226 of the ..... it is seen that section 9 of the civil procedure code, 1908 gives jurisdiction to the civil court to try all civil suits, unless barred ..... narayan, (2006) 8 scc336 which arose under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 and which was similar to the case on hand, this court held that a civil suit is not maintainable to challenge the acquisition proceedings 18 ..... the jurisdiction of the civil court to consider the legality and validity of the acquisition is barred, as has been held by the hon ble supreme court in bangalore development authority v. ..... in bangalore development authority v. .....

Seth Harish Chandra Vs. Union of IndiA.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1962]46ITR442(P& H)

..... lastly, the leaned counsel submitted that the honble judges of the supreme court, while disposing of the writ petition, had observed that the proper remedy of the appellant was to file a regular suit.section 67 lays down :'no suit shall be brought in any civil court to set aside or modify any assessment made under this act, and no prosecution, suit or other proceeding shall lie against any officer of the government for anything in good faith done or intended to be done ..... it would be seen that this decision was given by the high court on a reference under section 66(1) of the income-tax act and the question of filing a suit in a civil court regarding this matter was not involved in this authority and as such it has no application to the facts of the present case.in moti lal purshottam das v. ..... 'a bare reading of this section would show that the civil courts cannot entertain any suit in which the relief claimed is the setting aside or modification of any assessment order made under the act. ..... income-tax officer, special survey circle, bangalore, it was held that no recovery proceedings could be taken against a person under the income-tax act unless first a notice of demand was served on that person. ..... income-tax officer, special survey circle, bangalore, kailash nath v. .....

Pritam Singh Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)106PLR359

..... in section 20 of the code regarding territorial jurisdiction of the civil courts in suits other than suits for compensation for wrongs to persons or to movable property can provide guidelines to the courts in ..... the bench did not in any way differ from the ratio of lipton's case (supra) yet it obviously held that though the divisional office at bangalore would plainly have jurisdiction because it controlled the workmen at barrackpore who were employed beyond the state of karnatka, still it was held that the state of west bengal, ..... petitions on the other hand, maintained that the situs of the employment of the worker would play a crucial role in determining the appropriate government to make the reference under section 10 of the act as in section 2(a)(ii) the appropriate government has been defined to be the state government in relation to any other industrial dispute that the one figuring in sub ..... secretary for kerala estates & staffs' union south india' 1979 labour industrial case 86 to the effect that there may be cases where part of the cause of ..... is averred that the respondent-workmen are serving in different branches located in different cities in the state of punjab and the letter of retrenchment, order of suspension or order of termination of services (as the case may be) was served upon the concerned workman at those places and thus, the relationship of master and servant was snapped at the place of the posting of the workman in different cities of the punjab.4. mr. k.l. .....