Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bad Court: mumbai Page 8 of about 117,289 results (0.042 seconds)

Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. Vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax, (Exempti ...

Court : Mumbai

..... government of india under the special court (trial of offences relating to transactions in securities act 1992) in case of notified members (shri ashwin mehta, smt jyoti mehta and late shri harshad mehta)50,86,156annexure-1provision for bad and doubtful amount in clearing house account of the exchange for balances in the general charges account and ready delivery account of the members maintained by the clearing house not recoverable anymore99,91,839annexure-2total1,50,77,995 ..... he therefore submitted that the initiation of re-assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2005-06 were bad-in-law and accordingly prayed for quashing the impugned notice. ..... this being the case, the impugned notice is bad in law and on this ground alone the petitioner is entitled to succeed in this writ petition. 11. ..... of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts, no details thereof were furnished in the reasons for re-opening the assessment under section 147 of the act and hence, the initiation thereof was bad-in-law. .....

Shivamrut Dudh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh (Through Its Chairman Mr. Rajsin ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR297; 2004(5)BomCR165; 2004(3)MhLj668

..... the notification, on that ground also, therefore, cannot be held bad in law. ..... 4 herein, as ultra vires, unconstitutional and bad-in-law. .....

Shri Vinod Vithal Rane Vs. Shri R.H. Mendonca and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)537; (2001)2BOMLR307; 2001(2)MhLj437

..... a fortiori, even if we were to accept the argument advanced on behalf of the detenus that the subjective satisfaction recorded by the detaining authority is invalid and bad, even then the detention order cannot be quashed and set aside by virtue of provisions of section 5a of the act. ..... the grounds of detention specifically mention that the even tempo of life of the citizens in the above areas is badly disturbed as the people in the areas are experiencing a sense of insecurity and are living and carrying on their daily avocation under a constant shadow of fear. ..... in our view, non-mentioning of action taken under criminal procedure code or bombay police act in the grounds of detention, ipso facto, would not render the detention order bad or illegal. ..... it is thus contended that in absence of the above it would clearly show non-applica-tion of mind on the part of the detaining authority, for which reason the detention order is illegal and bad in law. .....

Golden Chariot Airport a Registered Partnership Firm Vs. Airports Auth ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR1347

..... ramjee : [1977]2scr904 where the supreme court observed as follows:if the authority which takes the final decision acts mechanically and without applying its own mind, the order may be bad, but if the decision-making body, after fair and independent consideration, reaches a conclusion which tallies with the recommendations of the subordinate authority which held the preliminary enquiry, there is no error in law. ..... even in such a situation, the supreme court observed as follows:if the authority which takes the final decision acts mechanically and without applying its own mind, the order may be bad, but if the decision-making body, after fair and independent consideration, reaches a conclusion which tallies with the recommendations of the subordinate authority which held the preliminary enquiry, there is no error in law. .....

Venkatesh Iyer Vs. Bombay Hospital Trust and Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(3)BomCR503

..... that tata memorial hospital also was a necessary party to this suit as the plaintiff has taken treatment from tata memorial hospital and from various doctors of tata memorial hospital and hence the suit is bad lor non-joinder of necessary parties and has to be dismissed.72. ..... reasons for arriving for those findings are given in the foregoing paragraphs:issuesfindings1.isthe suit bared by limitation?yes.2.isthe suit bad for non joinder of necessary parties as alleged inparagraph no. ..... it is contended by the defendants that the suit is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties and hence it should be dismissed on that count alone.70. ..... thus, in view of the foregoing discussion, i hold that not joining the trustees of the bombay hospital trust and also tata memorial hospital is a serious lacuna and the suit certainly is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. ..... 3 has further submitted that the suit was also bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. ..... suit filed against the bombay hospital trust through its medical director and superintendent, who happen to be the employees of the said trust, without joining all the trustees of the said bombay hospital trust is bad and has to be dismissed.71. .....

Bank of Maharashtra, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Banking Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR407; 2007(4)BomCR9

..... 2 under the purported deed of assignment dated 17.09.1999 is fraudulent, illegal, invalid, null and void, bad in law and not binding upon the plaintiffs and any other creditors of the defendants no. 1. ..... 3 on 30.8.2001 is illegal, invalid, null and void, bad in law and not binding upon the plaintiffs and any other creditors of the defendants no. 1. ..... 3 is fraudulent, sham, false, bogus, bad in law, null and void and not binding upon the plaintiffs and all other creditors of the defendants no. .....

Siddharth Holding Pvt. Ltd. a Company Registered Under the Companies A ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR232; 2003(6)BomCR857

..... the points for consideration formulated by the appellate court read thus:'1) whether co-operative court had jurisdiction to try the dispute as is raised and to what extent?2) whether the dispute is bad for no mentioning of the cause of action?3) whether the the disputants are valid members of the society?3a) does the society prove that for want of having valid share certificate and for their failure to produce ..... . 6 could not have acquired membership in 1993 because the administrator did not have authority to do so or because his action to enroll them as member was bad in law?3d) does the society prove that since the acquisition of shares by the disputant no ..... cannot sever the illegal from the legal part of a covenant the contract is altogether void, but where you can sever them, whether the illegality be created by statute or by the common law, you may reject the bad part and retain the goods ..... .' alternatively the question would be whether the whole contract is bad .....

Unit Trust of India, Mumbai and anr. Vs. P.K. Unny and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001(3)BomCR673; 2002(1)MhLj301

..... on loans and advances made to other credit institutions [or to any co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking), accruing or arising to the credit institution in that previous year:] provided that any interest in relation to categories of bad or doubtful debts referred to in section 43d of the income-tax act shall bedeemed to accrue or arise to the credit institution in the previous year in which it is credited by the credit institution to its profit and loss account for ..... whether uti was exigible to interest tax act; whether notices under section 10(a) were bad in law and whether the department was entitled to levy penalty and interest under the provisions of interest tax act for alleged failure to file ..... the total amount of interest (other than interest on loans and advances made to [credit institutions]) accruing or arising to the assessee in the previous year, a deduction in respect of the amount of interest which is established to have become a bad debt during the previous year. ..... result of business of a credit institution is a loss, yet, such credit institution will have to pay interest tax on the gross interest; that no deductions are allowed while computing interest chargeable to interest tax except the bad debt. ..... computing the chargeable interest of the assessee of an earlier previous year and the amount has been written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee for the previous year during which it is established to have become a bad debt. .....

Pefco Foundry Vs. Baban Ananda Dhotre and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2000(86)FLR24]; (2000)IIILLJ658Bom

..... according to the company, the past record would reflect two clear facts: (i) the behaviour and the conduct of the driver was very bad, and (ii) in spite of such a bad record the company always took a lenient view and continued him in employment and finally when the tolerance crossed the limits the company had to dismiss the workman in accordance with law.5. ..... it cannot be denied and it was not denied that the past record of the driver was very bad. .....

Twinstar Holdings Ltd. Vs. Anand Kedia, Deputy Cit and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR56; (2003)2BOMLR184; [2003]260ITR6(Bom); 2003(2)MhLj963

..... learned counsel for the petitioner contended that by the impugned orders, the assessing officers have attached the impugned shares by actual seizure which was bad in law and without jurisdiction as the impugned orders are prohibitory orders under rule 26. ..... therefore, the impugned orders/notices (exhibit j.1 to exhibit j.3) were bad in law and without jurisdiction as they are prohibitory orders under rule 26(1)(iii) of the second schedule. ..... in the circumstances, the impugned orders were bad in law, ultra vires and without jurisdiction. ..... he, therefore, contended that the said orders were bad in law and without jurisdiction. ..... therefore, the prohibitory order was bad in law. ..... that, in the present case, rules of natural justice have been violated and, therefore, the impugned orders were bad in law.13. ..... and since the third schedule refers to movable property attachable by actual seizure and since the third schedule does not contemplate issuance of prohibitory orders as contemplated by rule 26(1), the impugned orders were illegal and bad in law. .....