Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bad Court: mumbai Page 10 of about 117,289 results (0.035 seconds)

May 02 2001 (HC)

Shri Mastan Kasim Shaikh Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Comm ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)1331; (2001)3BOMLR208; 2001CriLJ3671

..... implicit in article 22(5) of the constitution of india, that his representation had to be disposed off at the earliest opportunity has been violated and the continued detention of the detenu has been rendered bad and illegal in law.8. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2001 (HC)

Mohd. Aslam Abdul Sattar Shaikh Vs. M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)4BOMLR506

..... ground 8(b) in substance is that the order of detention is illegal and bad in law, as there is a grave delay in passing the order of detention dated 16th march, 2001. ..... bail, even though, he wasgranted bail by the competent court, but that, inspite of this, the impugned detention order came to be passed, showing total non-application of mind, and hence, the detention order was illegal, bad-in-law, and liable to be quashed and set-aside.21. ..... thus, it does not make the detention order bad.10. mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2001 (HC)

Padmini R. Bijoor and ors. Vs. Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR321; (2002)IIILLJ891Bom

..... naik was that the order of termination was bad also for the reason that it was given effect to retrospectively. ..... from october 21, 1986, and was therefore bad in law. ..... as far as the order of termination is concerned, it is undoubtedly a retrospective order and to that extent only it would be bad. ..... he relied upon the judgment of the calcutta high court wherein the court held that in the event such a retrospective effect is given, the entire order is bad. ..... of principles of natural justice could be contended by the petitioner, the charges were duly proved and that the order could not be set aside on the alleged ground that it was a retrospective order and was therefore bad.10. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2002 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. G.S. Shukla

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR430; 2003(2)BomCR581; 2003(1)MhLj865

..... a resume of the relevant case law on the point the supreme court observed that the disciplinary proceedings are meant not really to punish the guilty but to keep the administrative machinery unsullied by getting rid of bad elements and hence they should not be unduly delayed. ..... the disciplinary proceedings are meant not really to punish the guilty but to keep the administrative machinery unsullied by getting rid of bad elements. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2008 (HC)

Shri Francisco D. Luis Vs. the Director, Board of Secondary and Higher ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR569; (2008)110BOMLR2892

..... all elr 680, enunciating the aspects of unreasonableness in executive action of the public authorities, it was stated that if the power is exercised so as to give impression or interference to the court that there has been unreasonableness in such action, it is taken in bad faith extraneous circumstances have been taken into consideration, there has been disregard of public policy and relevant consideration have been ignored then authorities would be said to have acted unreasonable ..... . course under general category was held to be bad and improper.41 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 1996 (HC)

Smt. Ranjana Prashant Rathi Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR284

..... the order is, therefore, bad. ..... order, therefore, bad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2002 (HC)

institute of Mechanical Engineers (India) and ors. Vs. R.N. Engineer

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR183; 2003(2)BomCR330

..... that in the previous litigation relating to the meeting dated 30th august, 1999, the judicial pronouncement discloses that the resolution passed in the annual general meeting held on 30th august, 1999 was neither held to be bad in law nor to be ultra virus provisions of the constitution of the institution and, therefore, for all purposes it is to be held that the institution has terminated the presidentship of the respondent with effect from 30th august, 1999 ..... meeting which was proposed to be held on 27th august, 2000 to be illegal and bad in law and resolutions if passed therein to be void and not binding upon the institution and its members and for consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the respondent from holding out and acting as president ..... august, 2000 or any other day in any manner whatsoever and for the declaration that the conduct of the respondent in holding out as president of the institution and convening extra-ordinary general meeting is illegal and bad in law and void, and that the respondent is not entitled to address or issue any circular or letter as the president or member of the council of the institution and further for declaration that the extra ordinary general .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2008 (HC)

Nishmukh Investments and Trading Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2009)224CTR(Bom)259; [2009]312ITR1(Bom)

..... also submitted that even assuming that under the order passed by the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) if a finding to the effect of directing the assessing officer to proceed with the assessment was found, the same would be bad in law because the issue of the assessment was not the subject-matter of the controversy between the parties concerned before the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) and the same was not raised ..... . the assessment under section 143(3) was, therefore, also invalid and bad in law ..... . in view thereof the notice issued by the assessing officer on september 14, 1995, under section 143(2) was beyond the prescribed period of one year as bad in law ..... . in view thereof the assessment order passed under section 143(3) as a consequence of the same was also invalid and bad in law ..... appeals), therefore, rejected the argument of the assessing officer and held that time limit for issuing a notice under section 143(2) had already elapsed and as such notice issued on september 14, 1995 was invalid and bad in law .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2009 (HC)

D.R. Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj765

..... therefore, when wide powers are conferred on the state under the slum act to set up such a committee and even otherwise its executive powers permitting it to do so, then, the petitioner cannot be heard to say that the gr is bad in law, unconstitutional, null and void. ..... therefore, the constitution of the committee is bad in law and challenge to the same is, therefore, maintainable.12. mr. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2003 (HC)

Vijaynagar Co-op Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)91TTJ(Mumbai)809

..... he has also submitted that the reopening of assessment was bad in law because there was no escapement of income and the notices were issued due to change of opinion. ..... he has contended that the reopening of assessments were bad in law in view of the specific provisions of section 14a, therefore, deserves to be quashed.6. ..... reasons have already been given, on the basis of the same, we are of the view that the reopening was bad in law, hence deserves to be quashed. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //