Avoidance - Judgment Search Results

Coleman Vs. Balkcom

Court: US Supreme Court

..... responsibility for this mockery of our criminal justice system perhaps out of a desire to avoid even the possibility of a bloody assizes this court and the lower federal courts have ..... state and federal courts that the actual imposition of the death sentence is to be avoided at all costs that surely was not the intent of the opinion of justices stewart .....

Vasquez Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of executing an arrest to contrive their own exigency and thereby avoid the necessity of procuring a warrant before entering the home this ..... giving rise to the warrantless entry could not responsibly have been avoided see united states v rosselli 506 f 2d 627 ca7 1974 ..... of executing an arrest to contrive their own exigency and thereby avoid the necessity of procuring a warrant before entering the home .....

Anderson Vs. Winsett

Court: US Supreme Court

anderson v winsett 449 u s 1093 1981 u s supreme court anderson v winsett 449 u s 1093 1981...

Savithri Amma Vs. Devaki Amma

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1982Kant67; 1981(1)KarLJ162

..... munsiff in the present case i do hope that the subordinate courts will at least avoid the same in future re point no m whether the claim of the plaintiff for .....

Spaziano Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... from sentencing the petitioner for the lesser crime the court should not be permitted to avoid this legal question by refusing to allow the jury to decide whether the defendant is .....

Kolom Vs. C.i.R.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in short congress enacted 83 for the purpose of ending tax avoidance schemes using spurious restrictions congress did not however intend to ..... words fair market value whereas 83 seeking to end tax avoidance through the use of non qualifying stock and spurious restrictions ..... the receipt of the option rather than an attempt to avoid taxes by attaching ephemeral restrictions to stock transferred to the .....

Green Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 929 932 where a defendant s mistrial motion is necessitated by prosecutorial impropriety designed to avoid an acquittal reprosecution might well be barred 400 u s at 485 n 12 n .....

Estelle Vs. Jurek

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but that is page 450 u s 1015 surely no reason for this court to avoid its responsibility of resolving a case as important to the integrity of our judicial system .....

illinois Vs. Zegart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that she drove too fast for conditions failed to reduce speed to avoid an accident failed to drive her vehicle in the proper lane ..... a traffic citation charging the respondent with failing to reduce speed to avoid an accident the respondent was convicted and fined the state then ..... of failing page 452 u s 948 950 to reduce speed to avoid an accident is the same offense for double jeopardy purposes as .....

California Vs. Prysock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 451 u s 1301 1304 ner of questioning an accused it has allowed courts to avoid the intractable factual determinations that the former totality of the circumstances approach often entailed when .....