Authorize - Year 2000 - Judgments

Aug 28 2000 (HC)

K. Rajendraprasad Vs. Authority Under Section 41 of A.P. Shops, and Es ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-28-2000

Reported in: 2000(5)ALD731; 2000(5)ALT599; [2000(87)FLR690]; (2001)ILLJ485AP

..... wages observing that the enquiry held against the workman was vitiated and that the appellate authority the first respondent herein should not have condoned the delay of 4 years 4 months ..... opinion with that of labour court unless found that impugned order passed without jurisdiction labour court exercised its jurisdiction under section 11 a order of labour court not impugned no interference by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 2000 (HC)

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Authority Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (Depu ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-02-2000

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR805]; (2000)IILLJ945Mad

..... be a declared holiday learned counsel has argued that the authority has no jurisdiction to order for payment of wages on the said date ..... paid on september 30 1990 the respondents workmen approached the competent authority under the payment of wages act on the ground that they ..... the members of the minority union and they have approached the authority on the ground that settlement under section 18 1 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 19 2000 (HC)

Railway Employees Co-operative Banking Society Ltd. Vs. Authority Unde ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-19-2000

Reported in: [2000(84)FLR1008]; (2000)IIILLJ898Raj; 2000(1)WLC159; 2000(3)WLN344

..... apparent on face of record we have found that it is not a case where authority lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the subject ordinarily the findings of fact recorded on appreciation of ..... finding of arithmetical computation of work period of six months by the workman which gives jurisdiction to authority under section 28 a to make orders thereunder as established on the 1 basis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 2000 (SC)

international Airport Authority Employees Union and anr. Vs. Internati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-08-2000

Reported in: 2001(49)BLJR1361; [2001(88)FLR537]; JT2001(1)SC24; (2001)ILLJ549SC; (2001)1MLJ195(SC); 2000(8)SCALE207; 2001(1)LC258(SC); (2001)1UPLBEC259

s rajendra babu j 1 in these matters we are concerned with i a nos 7 9 of 1999 in...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2000 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd., Rourkela Steel Plant Vs. Assistant Labo ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-21-2000

Reported in: [2000(85)FLR71]; 2001(I)OLR127

..... by the opposite parties 2 to 166 the petitioner filed its objection before the competent authority challenging the maintainability of the proceeding on the ground that the very same grievance has ..... matter shall not proceed further before the assistant labour commissioner central who is the controlling authority pursuant to the orders passed by this court notices were issued in all the cases .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2000 (HC)

international Airport Authority of India Workers Union Vs. Airport Aut ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2000

Reported in: 2000VIAD(Delhi)119; 88(2000)DLT322; 2000(54)DRJ378; 2001(2)RAJ69

..... to the functioning and recognition of employees union such questions cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction writ petition is not maintainable it appears that parties are having strong divergent views in ..... functionary in contrast to the present case where the relief is sought against the airport authority of india which is undoubtedly an instrumentality of the state within the meaning of article .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2000 (HC)

indore Development Authority, Indore Vs. Indore Development Authority ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-26-2000

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR57]; 2001(1)MPHT367

..... the petitioners under various schemes framedby state of rajasthan and entrusted to district rural development authority drda 17 the supreme court while dealing with the matter has held that when a ..... chandrabhushan supra high court had interfered with concluded findings of facts arrived at by consolidation authority in this view of the matter apex court has elegantly decided that high court had .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2000 (HC)