Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: auroville foundation act 1988 section 9 certain powers of the central government or the foundation Page 1 of about 197 results (0.156 seconds)

Gilles Pfeiffer Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1996Mad322

..... experiment for evolutionary growth has been recognised nationally and internationally. the parliament of this country enacted the auroville foundation act, 1980 (for short, the act) with the avowed object of continuing and consolidating the activities of auroville which had been recognised as contributing to the international understanding and promotion of peace. the united nations ..... the first respondent.24. counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of respondents 4 and 5 giving the details of the auroville foundation, its bodies, objects and functions, and the provisions of the act. reading of the affidavit shows that the respondents 4 and 5 are supporting the petitioner, and they have prayed ..... and sent to government of india, home ministry.22. it is also submitted that the act relates only to the acquisition and transfer of the undertakings of the auroville and to vest such undertakings in a foundation established for the purpose, with a view to making long term arrangement for the better .....

Valliammal Vs. State of Madras and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1967Mad332

..... not the result of improper pressure of illegitimate influence. those allegations have not even been advanced in the present case. in our view, there us no foundation whatever for the imputation of mala fides. since the purpose is irrefutably a public one, and the imputation of mala fides has no justification, the proposed ..... land cannot be classified separately from its present registration and character. hence, the state was justified in exercising the urgency powers under sec. 17(1) of the act. the learned judge (srinivasan j.) emphasises that it is the subjective satisfaction of the state which is here relevant provided that that satisfaction could be reasonably defended ..... grounds, which are set forth in the judgment. the fact was that he was satisfied that the notification under section 4(1) of the land acquisition act related to a 'public purpose' concerning which the government could legitimately exercise their powers of eminent domain. in the absence of any established mala fides or .....

Usha @ Usharani and Another Vs. Auroville Foundation, rep.by its Land ...

Court : Chennai

..... complaint before the judicial magistrate, vanur, for offences under section 406 and 420 ipc alleging that usha (a1) had committed criminal acts of breach of trust and cheating by transferring x property, which belongs to auroville foundation, in favour of her husband devadass (a2) on 16.05.2012 and thereby, encumbering the property. 2.3 the judicial ..... 464 ipc. 4. this court gave its anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners. 5. the allegation of auroville foundation is that x property belongs to them by virtue of the exchange deed dated 16.06.1995, but, the title deeds of x property were with usha ..... remained in the custody of the respective parties. while so, usha (a1) executed a gift deed dated 16.05.2012 in respect of x property belonging to auroville foundation in favour of her husband devadass (a2), taking undue advantage of the fact that the original documents of x property were in her possession. thereafter, devadass ( .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Gopal Chandra Misra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC694; [1978(37)FLR16]; (1978)ILLJ492SC; (1978)2SCC301; [1978]3SCR12

..... president. thus, the first two pillars of the ratiocinative edifice raised by the it high court rest on sound foundations. but, is the same true about the third, which indisputably is the chief prop of that edifice is it a completed act of resignation within the contemplation of proviso (a) this is the primary question that calls for an answer. ..... if the answer to this question is found in the affirmative, the appeals must fail. if it be in the negative, the foundation for the reasoning of the high court will fail ..... same unless the constitution so provided.28. with respect, we venture to say that this reasoning is convoluted logic spiralled up round a fiction for which there is no foundation in the statute. to say that the resignation or relinquishment of his office by the judge could not take place before 1.8.77, and yet, the factum .....

Pabst Brewing Co. Vs. Crenshaw

Court : US Supreme Court

..... on the one hand, the validity of the wilson law, and yet seeks to take this case out of the reach of its provisions by distinctions which have no foundation in reason unless it be that that law is to be disregarded or held to be unconstitutional. decree affirmed. mr. justice brown, dissenting: the opinion of the ..... an expert beer brewer, and who is required to furnish a bond, and is given power to appoint the necessary deputies to execute the provisions of the act. the act forbids every person or corporation engaged in brewing page 198 u. s. 23 within the state from using any material or chemical in the manufacture of beer ..... or other limitations imposed by that constitution upon the state government. it necessarily results from this that the assailed law comes directly within the express terms of the wilson act. the determination of this question by the supreme court of missouri as to liquor manufactured in missouri, in the absence of discrimination, is necessarily conclusive, also, as .....

JaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164

..... court has, thereforee,territorial jurisdiction to hear the writ petition.(156) alternate remedy :writ jurisdiction in certiorari is a constitutional jurisdiction.amendments to customs act by finance act no. 2 of 1980would not oust the jurisdiction. i have already held that the collector's order was without jurisdiction, was perverse and contraryto ..... that there is an equally efficacious remedy by way of an appeal to the appellate tribunal established under section 129 of the customs act. that act was amended by finance act 2 of 1980 whereby a separate procedure of appeals and reference has been created. the appellate tribunal was established on 11-10-1982 ..... penalty requires deliberate action and knowledge (see charan das malhotra v. assistant collector ofcustoms, : air1968cal28 ). section relating to seizure,under section 112 of the act is independent of section 125 (seer. s. kalyanaraman v. the collector of customs 1978 tax law review 1735x36). as proceedings under section 111 are taken .....

Sai Sankar, Asst. Professor in Music, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai and Other ...

Court : Chennai

..... demitted her office, whether the resignation could be allowed to be withdrawn by the central government. 20. admittedly, there is no provision in the kalakshetra foundation act enabling the director to resign or providing for acceptance of resignation or withdrawal of resignation. therefore, one has to seek recourse to the common law principles ..... rules, 2002". the said rules have been issued by the central government in exercise of the power conferred under section 31(2) of the kalakshetra foundation act. the rules deal with the method of recruitment, age limit, qualification, disqualification and other matters relating to a director. but, unfortunately, in the ..... aims and objects for which kalakshetra was founded, the central government came out with an act known as the kalakshetra foundation act, 1993 [hereinafter referred to as the act]. as per section 4 of the act, on the commencement of the act, the right, title and interest in relation to the assets and properties of kalakshetra .....

State of Maharashtra Through the Police Station Officer Vs. Prabhudaya ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR410; (1993)95BOMLR31; I(1993)DMC137

..... such inference is not only misplaced but is completely ill-conceived. the approach and reasoning adopted in this regard in any manner suffers with perversity. such invention has no foundation with the material on record. it is pertinent to note at this stage that nothing was put to p.w. 8 madanlal in his cross-examination about her affairs ..... with section 34 of the indian penal code. accordingly he proceeded to record the evidence of p.w. nos. 1 to 8. thereafter by order dated 22-8-1988 the learned judge framed the additional charge for the offence punishable under section 306 read with section 34 of the i.p.c. it is reported that challenge to ..... . this further fortifies our conclusion of homicidal death. in the set of circumstances latching of doors leading to the open compound from outside, we cannot accept as the act of dead. latching of doors and pouring of kerosene after assault was a farcical venture skilfully and conveniently made to bring colour of suicide to the incident.16. now .....

The Harriman

Court : US Supreme Court

..... court. this is an appeal in admiralty from the decree of the circuit court of the united states for the district of california. the charter party, which lies at the foundation of the controversy bears date on the 4th of may, 1866. the parties to it were jansen, the claimant, and owner of the ship, and emerick, the freighter. ..... hardly contemplate anything of the kind, hence the omission, and wish you will make some provision in the event such should be the case, and instruct me how to act, that i may communicate same to captain swenson." emerick made no reply. the ship proceeded to the chincha islands, and returned thence to san francisco. captain swenson, in ..... hardly contemplate anything of the kind, hence the omission, and wish you will make some provision in the event such should be the case, and instruct me how to act, that i may communicate same to captain swenson." during the period of this transaction, war existed between spain and chili. the cargo was intended for the admiral of .....

The Conqueror

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the decks of other vessels, are mere manufactures or other "articles," and are within the description of the tariff acts. but the decisive objection to the taxability of vessels as imports is found in the fact that, from the foundation of the government, vessels have been treated as sui generis, and subject to an entirely different set of laws ..... and regulations from those applied to imported articles. by the very first act passed by congress in 1789, subsequent to an act for administering oaths to its own members, a ..... employment in the towing business, and the amount of the earnings, if employed. this page 166 u. s. 128 kind of proof is too speculative and contingent to be the foundation of any rule of damages. it is, at best, but conjecture." on appeal to this court, the decree was affirmed. sturgis v. clough, 1 wall. 269, mr .....