Attack - Judgment Search Results

Preiser Vs. Rodriguez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in short congress has determined that habeas corpus is the appropriate remedy for state prisoners attacking the validity of the fact or length of their confinement and that specific determination must ..... of particular state administrative concern as it does where state judicial action is being attacked that comity considerations are not limited to challenges to the validity of state court convictions .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... consent of the states 1007 the 18th amendment was vigorously attacked in the national prohibition cases on the ground that it ..... of the laws for securing the objects specified therein from attack on the ground that they violate articles 14 19 and ..... no responsibility beyond that which the law affixes to indefensible attacks on private character or incitements to illegal conduct the temptations .....

Braden Vs. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision are untenable a 1950 amendment to the habeas corpus statute requires that a collateral attack on a federal sentence be brought in the sentencing court rather than the district where ..... within their respective jurisdictions as the amended 2255 is relevant only to federal prisoners collaterally attacking a conviction and as 2241 d applies only to intrastate jurisdiction the relevance of the .....

Schneckloth Vs. Bustamonte

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of other constitutional rights which we have held subject to collateral attack by federal prisoners for unlike a claim of denial of ..... less apparent in the typical fourth amendment claim asserted on collateral attack in this latter case a convicted defendant is most often ..... required to reexamine claims on collateral page 412 u s 261 attack footnote 2 15 they deprive primary litigants of their prompt .....

CBS Vs. Democratic Nat'l Committee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the fcc s complementary efforts we think the fairness doctrine and its component personal attack and political editorializing regulations are a legitimate exercise of congressionally delegated authority 395 u ..... on controversial issues of public importance in practical effect the broadcaster policy here under attack permits airing of only those paid presentations which advertise products or deal with .....

K.A. Kannappa Chetti Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1973)2MLJ212

..... learned judge further observed as follows therefore in dealing with the attack against the validity of a law creating state monopoly on the ..... the employees state insurance corporation so also the act cannot be attacked on the ground that it was not made for the ..... in terms of the hire purchase agreement in dealing with the attack of the operator we held that the interim provisions substantially .....

Gosa Vs. Mayden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... between state and federal courts these same considerations inhere in the context of collateral attack in federal court upon the judgments of military tribunals which constitute a judicial system ..... in federal habeas corpus rigid rules restricting what questions are open to litigation on collateral attack are inappropriate in the context of judgments affecting personal liberty there are of course .....

Rajnagar Vaktapur Ginning, Pressing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (In Liq ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [1975]99ITR264(Guj)

..... not the persons who have earned and enjoyed the depreciation on these assets now to attack this classification as an irrational or arbitrary classification is to say the least misconceived ..... other fields legislatures possess the greatest freedom in classification the burden is on the one attacking the legislative arrangement to negative every conceivable basis which might support it as rottschaefer .....

ChaffIn Vs. Stynchcombe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on retrial as punishment for those who successfully exercised their right to appeal or to attack collaterally their conviction footnote 11 those actually subjected to harsher resentencing as a consequence page ..... not place an impermissible burden on the right of a criminal defendant to appeal or attack collaterally his conviction affirmed mr justice douglas dissents for the reasons stated in his .....

United States Vs. Glaxo Group Ltd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appellees to restrain alleged violations of 1 of the sherman act and the government also attacked the validity of the dosage form patents and sought the relief of mandatory nondiscriminatory bulk ..... public interest in enjoining violations of the sherman act the united states is entitled to attack the validity of patents relied upon to justify anticompetitive conduct otherwise violative of the law .....