Skip to content


Assert - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: assert Sorted by: recent Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 6,419 results (0.055 seconds)
Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

C.C. (import) Vs. Nav Maharashtra Chakkan Oil Mills

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC193

..... is insufficient he has also gone by the rule that whoever asserts must prove in the present case commissioner was of the view ..... of origin true rule is that whoever asserts must prove that is to ask who asserted here assertion was by the foreign supplier and the ..... where the foreign supplier and the importer failed to prove their assertion 10 that apart the verification report of the indian consulate also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

Kamdeep Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC673

1 all these appeals are against imposition of penalties by the adjudicating authority under rule 209 a of the erstwhile...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri Savrinbhai B. Shah

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)(177)ELT559Tri(Mum.)bai

1 revenue is in appeal against the setting aside an order of confiscation of ball bearings of foreign origin from...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

Uma Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and C

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)(114)LC472Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the above appeals are directed against order passed by the commissioner of central excise amp customs surat dated 29...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

S. Seshadri Vs. the Recovery Officer-i and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: II(2004)BC200

1 this appeal is preferred by the appellant against the impugned order passed by the recovery officer i of this...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (HC)

Essar Machine Works Limited Vs. Cegat

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: 2004(93)ECC544

..... served it was the duty of the department to produce material in support of the assertion that in fact copy had been served or the petitioner had received the copy it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

M.S. Chahal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Asr.)841

1 these four appeals by the assessee are directed against the orders passed by the cit a on 5th oct...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (TRI)

A.K. Modi Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Jodh.)947

1 these three appeals of different assessees of the same group are directed against separate but identical orders passed by...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (HC)

Petroleum Workers Union Represented by Regional Secretary, Hindustan P ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: (2004)IIILLJ100Mad

orderk p sivasubramaniam j 1 the petitioners being the employees of hindustan petroleum corporation limited have sought for the issue...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2003 (HC)

Andhra Printers Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Industrial Tribunal-1 and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)ALT606; (2004)IILLJ1140AP

..... prejudice to the claim of either of the parties we have only noticed the said assertion of the respondent union in order to appreciate the nature of the claim put forth .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //