Court : Andhra Pradesh
COMMON ORDER: 1. The petitioners in Criminal Petition No.7063 of 2008 are accused 1 to 3 in C.C. No.48 of 2008 on the file of the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District. 2. The Woman Sub-Inspector of Police, Saroornagar women police station filed the charge-sheet in the said case alleging that P. Krishna Reddy and P. Kalavathi are the parents of Saritha, the 1st respondent in Criminal Petition No.7063 of 2008. Saritha was married to the 1st accused on 27-08-2005 and on the same day the 1st accused and Saritha left for the United States of America, as Saritha had to report at West Virginia University on 29-08-2005. Soon after arriving at the United States of America, the 1st accused demanded Saritha for money and took away 35 tulas of gold from her. The parents of Saritha visited the United States of America from 12-10-2005 to 07-11-2005 and still the 1st accused harassed Saritha physically and mentally and threatened her and her parents. Saritha gave ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Criminal Petition Nos.7063 of 2008 and 2539 o29. 02/2012 A. Ashok Vardhan Reddy and others Smt. P. Savitha and another COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy COUNSEL FOR 1ST RESPONDENT: Sri P. Krishna Reddy ^COUNSEL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT: -- Crl.P. No.2539 of 2009: A. Ashok Vardhan Reddy and others ... Petitioners State of A.P. represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another ...Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri Sharad Sanghi COUNSEL FOR 1ST RESPONDENT: -- COUNSEL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT: Sri P. Krishna Reddy CITATIONS:1. 1992 (3) ALT 46.2. 2002 (1) ALT (Crl.) 300 (D.B.) (A.P.) 3. 2008 (TLS) 1227198 4. 2008(2) Crimes 235 (M.P.) 5. 2006 (TLS6. 2009 (2) ALD (Crl.) 155 (AP) 7. 2011 (2) MLJ (Cri8. AIR 199.SC 140.9. 2010(2) ALD (Crl.) 689 (AP) 10. 2007 Crl.L.J.3361 = 2007(2) ALD (Crl.11. AIR 200.SC 89.12. AIR 199.SC 184.13. 2009(1) ALT (Crl.) 285 (A.P.) 14. 2008(2) ALD (Crl.) 1 (AP) 15. 2010 (1)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
COMMON JUDGMENT (Per Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) 1. The Writ Appeals on hand turn upon the maintainability of the writ petitions filed by Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd., the appellant company. Two learned Judges of this Court separately held against the appellant company and dismissed its three writ petitions on the ground of territorial jurisdiction. The fate of Writ Petition No.27663 of 2010, subsequently filed by the appellant company, would depend upon our decision in the appeals. 2. These cases arise against the backdrop of The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001 (for brevity, 'the Act'). This legislation was promulgated by the Parliament for protecting the intellectual property rights of plant breeders and farmers over plant varieties developed by them. The scheme of the Act provides for the authority constituted thereunder, viz., the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Authority (hereinafter, 'the competent authority') to entertain and process appl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE WA NOS.651 OF 2010.537 OF 201.& 539 OF 201.AND WP NO.27663 OF 201.24-01-2012 Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by its Dy.General Manager, Mr.S.Sartaj Mohammed Khan. Protection of Plant Variety & Farmers'Rights Authority, The Registrar, National Academy of Agricultural Sciences,(N.A.S.C.Complex), Opp. Village Todapur, DPS Marg, New Delhi 012. and others. Counsel for appellant/petitioner : Sri S.Niranjan Reddy Counsel for respondents : Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Assistant Solicitor General for India, Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, Senior Advocate for Sri Lakshmikumaran & Sri Sridharan. CASES REFERRED:1. (1979) 118 ITR 91.(AP) 2) (1990) 1 SCC 32.3) (2000) 7 SCC 64.4) (2002) 1 SCC 56.5) (2004) 6 SCC 25.6) (2007) 11 SCC 33.7) (2010) 2 SCC 53.8) (2006) 6 SCC 20.9) (2007) 6 SCC 76.10) (1993) 5 Sac LJ 1. 11) 1987 (1) AC 46.12) (2006) UKHL 4 13) AIR 201.DELHI 17 14) 1926 S.C. (H.L.15. 164 (2009) DLT 53.DB 16.19 R. 665, 668...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY, J.ORDER:1. This Criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash proceedings in Crime No.214 of 2008 on the file of Yemmiganur Town Police Station, Kurnool District/the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yemmiganur, insofar as the petitioners-A1 to A3 (for short A1 to A3) are concerned. The case is registered for offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 420 read with Section 34 I.P.C.2. Whereas the petitioners are A1 to A3, the 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant in the criminal case. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed in the criminal case.3. The facts of the case in brief are as follows:The defacto complainant purchased an extent of Ac.2.67 cents of land in Sy.No.388-B from one Ch.Veeraswamy under a registered sale deed No.1195 dated 13.06.1978 and thus acquired absolute rights over the said property. Dhanunjaya (A-2) and his brothers are interfering with his right...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
B.CHANDRA KUMAR, J.Order:1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 10.02.2009, passed by the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad (Appellate Authority) in R.A.No.94 of 2008, whereby and whereunder, the Appellate Authority has set aside the orders of the Principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad, passed in R.C.No.137 of 2006, dated 27.03.2008. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Principal Rent Controller for the sake of convenience. The petitioner is a landlady. Her simple case is that she is the owner of the shop bearing No.1-2-74 to 76, admeasuring about 1400 square feet, situated at Parklane, Secunderabad (hereinafter referred to as petition schedule shop). The respondent is her tenant and the agreed rent is Rs.900/- per month. The petitioner's sons and husband are carrying on business under the name and style of "Ramesh Watch Company" from a tenanted shop bearing No.127 and 128 (old) corresponding ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
G. BHAVANI PRASAD, J.JUDGMENT:1. The Criminal Appeal is directed against the acquittal of the accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by setting aside the conviction and sentence imposed by XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, by the judgment dated 28-12-2006 in C.C.No.343 of 2000, by the judgment dated 08-05-2007 in Criminal Appeal No.21 of 2007 on the file of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.2. The parties are referred to herein as they are arrayed before the trial Court. The complainant filed the complaint against the accused alleging that the complainant, a construction businessman, and the accused running a printing press are friends and the accused approached the complainant on 08-09-1999 for financial assistance for four months for running the printing press and the complainant gave Rs.7,50,000/- on the same day. The accused did not repay in spite of demands but he executed a promi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
K.C.BHANU, J.ORDER :1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Employees' Union, represented by its President C.Satish Kumar filed the present Writ Petition challenging the agreement dated 21.02.2009 entered into by the second respondent with the third respondent for the purpose of developing integrated MSW management system in second respondent corporation area as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to public interest.2. The averments, in brief, of the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition may be stated as follows:Petitioner is a registered trade union representing employees working in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'GHMC'). In order to protect the interest of its members and also to see that respondents 1 and 2 are kept within the bounds of the provisions of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short, 'GHMC Act, 1955') and the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000 (for short, hereinafter ref...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
The two petitioners in this writ petition mount a challenge to an order dated 07-06-2011 passed by the Tahasildar, Saidabad Mandal, Hyderabad District, in terms of Sectrion 6 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, (henceforth referred to as 'the L.E.Act') for their eviction, from the land said to be belonging to the Government unauthorisedly occupied by them. The case of the petitioners is this; the 1st petitioner purchased an extent of 108.69 square meters of land covered by premises No.16-1-24/60/1, Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad, under a registered sale deed dated 29-07-1980 bearing document No.775/81. The 2nd petitioner purchased another extent of 309.35 square meters of land, which also forms part of the same premises, through another registered sale deed dated 29-07-1980, bearing document No.8101/80. Both the petitioners purchased the respective extents of land from Sri G. Balaiah, who, in turn, purchased the same from one Sri Lakshminarayan, under a registere...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
1. The petitioner is a Practicing Advocate, a former Member of Parliament and A.P. Legislative Assembly. He has also held positions in the Zilla Parishad, Nizamabad District, and was associated with the Agro Industries in different capacities. He filed this writ petition with a prayer to declare that the action of the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs (for short 'the respondent'), in withholding a note on Chapter-VIII (Law and Order and Internal Security Dimensions) (for short 'the note') of the report of the Committee for Consultation on the situation in Andhra Pradesh, headed by Sri Justice Srikrishna (hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee'); as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional. Consequential direction to the respondent to furnish the same to him, or to place it on the website of the respondent, is also sought. 2. The averments, in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, in brief, are that, the State of Andhra Pradesh was formed by merging...
Tag this Judgment!