Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25382 OF 201.17.08.2012 Boga Satyanarayana The Mandal Revenue Officer (Tahasildar) and others. Counsel for petitioner: Sri Ghanshyamdas Mandhani Counsel for Respondents : GP for REvenue HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred 2008 (5) ALD 62.(DB) ORDER: The petitioner purchased Ac.0.10 guntas of land in survey No.735 of Kothapally Village, Karimnagar District, through a sale deed, dated 29.08.2006. He has traced the origin of his title to the land and submits that much prior to 25.07.1958, the land was assigned, and thereafter, several transactions of civil have taken place. According to him, the prohibition contained under Section 3 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short 'the Act') does not apply to the land, since no condition was imposed prohibiting alienation of the land in survey No.735, when it was assigned. Reference is made to G.O.Ms.No.1406 dated 25.07.1958, through which, conditions prohibiting a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
(ITTA.No.22 of 2000: Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act-1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad in IT.(SS).A.No.48/Vizag/97 for Assessment year, dt.21.09.1999 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam, dt.27.11.1997 in PNN/GIR.No.H-7). (ITTA.No.24 of 2000: Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act-1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad in IT(SS).A.No.48/Vizag/97 for dt.21.09.1999 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam, dt.27.11.1997 in PNN/GIR.No.H-7). (Common Judgment: (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.) ITTA No.22 of 2000 filed by the assessee M/s.Hastalloy India Limited and ITTA No.24 of 2000 filed by the Revenue are appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A.NO.22 OF 200.16.08.2012 M/s.Hastalloy India Limited, Visakhapatnam. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam. I.T.T.A.NO.24 OF 200.16.08.2012 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam. M/s.Hastalloy India Limited, Visakhapatnam HEAD NOTE: Senior Counsel for the assessee (appellant in ITTA No.22 of 2000 and respondent in ITTA No.24 of 2000):Sri C.Kodandaram Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue(respondent in ITTA No.22 of 2000 and appellant in ITTA No.24 of 2000): Sri S.R.Ashok. Cases referred 1.2000 (6) S.C.C2. (1986 Supp. S.C.C. 110 = Volume 159 ITR page 78) 3 AIR 200.SC 142.4 2011 (1) S.C.C5. 1972 (83) I.T.R. page 187 = (1972) 4 S.C.C6. (2001) 3 S.C.C.179 7 (2011) 4 SCC 24.8 AIR 197.S.C. 87=(1973) 2 S.C.C9. AIR 199.S.C. 1984 = (1990) 4 S.C.C 59.10. (2011) 1 SCC 15.para 9 I.T.T.A.Nos.22 and 24 of 2000 COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sri Ju...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Common Judgment: Writ Appeal Nos.1159 to 1166 of 2009 are filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh (the ‘State’); Writ Appeal Nos.1306 to 1313 of 2009 are by the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) and W.P.No.29063 of 2009 is by five individuals. The eight appeals each filed by the State and the HMDA are against the common judgment dated 02-06-2009 in W.P.Nos.3421 of 2008, 12928 of 2008, 3750 of 2009, 22619 of 2007, 7747 of 2008, 10084 of 2006, 8761 of 2008 and 6425 of 2009; and the writ petition is by five individuals challenging memo No.1640/J.A1/03-09, Revenue Department, dated 21-05-2005 (the ‘impugned memo’), passed by the Principal Secretary (Revenue) of the State. It is this memo which was set aside by the learned single Judge, against which the sixteen (16) appeals are preferred. Several individuals filed eight writ petitions challenging the validity of the memo dated 21-05-2005 and in two of the writ petitions (W.P.Nos.22619 of 2007 and 7747...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
(Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare G.O.Ms.No.132, Law (LA and J SC.F) Department dated 16 Nov 11 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law wholly unconstitutinal and quash the same as such and consequently quash the notification dated 22 Dec 11 prepared by the 2nd Respondent as illegal and contrary to law and consequently or/and in the alternative declare that the amendment issued vide G.O.Ms.No.132 Law (LA and J SC. F) department dated 16 Nov 11 is only prospective in nature and shall not be made applicable to the selection process already started pursuant to the recruitment notification dated 19.8.010 issued by the 1st Respondent for appointment to 18 District and Sessions Judges and consequently direct the respondents to prepare a fresh select list of recruit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
This Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 20-08-2004 passed in S.C.No.108 of 1999 on the file of the V Additional Sessions Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, whereby and whereunder the appellant-A1 was convicted for the offences under Section 498-A and 304-B of IPC and accordingly sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and also to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 304-B of IPC. 2. The brief averments of the charge sheet are as follows: A-1 and A-3 are the sons of A-2. A-1 is working as Development Officer in LIC at Gopalapuram. The deceased by name Khandavalli Florence @ Anitha is the sister of PW-2 and daughter of PW-3. The deceased was married to A-1 on 31-08-1990. At the tim...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the orders of the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in O.A.No.660/2012, dated 05.03.2012 and quash the same as being erroneous in excess of jurisdiction and contrary to law and facts of the case.) Common Order:(G. Krishna Mohan Reddy, J.) These two writ petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the same order dated 05.3.2012 of the Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.660 of 2012. The said O.A. was filed by Smt.Palla Venkata Ratnam, Sub Divisional Police Officer (SDPO/DSP), Ramachandrapuram, Medak District (hereafter, the applicant) against the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Director General of Police (DGP), the Superintendent of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Sri Bellapu Nageswar Rao, the petitioner, has filed this public interest litigation case, in person, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to declare G.O. Ms. No.390 dt.18.6.2012, insofar as not providing reservation to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes candidates and collection of fixed licence fee proposed, based on population, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 15(2)(a), 16(2), and 19(1)(g) and 19(6) of the Constitution of India, and to direct the respondents to follow the Rule of Reservation as per the Constitution. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it is stated that the petitioner is questioning the policy of the Government for the excise year 2012-2013 for disposal of retail liquor outlets on the ground that the people belonging to Scheduled Casts and Backward Classes are not provided reservation.In support of his case, he relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court in Cooverjee B. Bharucha v. Excise Commissioner and the Chief Commissi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
COMMON ORDER: Company Application No.524 of 2008 is filed by the Managing Director of LVSR Farms Private Limited, (hereinafter called the “Assignee”), to direct the Official Liquidator to recognize them as the secured creditor of the company under liquidation in the place of ICICI, IFCI, IDBI and LIC (the Central financial Institutions – hereinafter called “CFIs”). Company Application No.1007 of 2011 is filed by A.P. Industrial Developmental Corporation, represented by its Managing Director (hereinafter called “APIDC”), to treat them as the sole secured creditor having charge over land admeasuring Ac.10.13, (hereinafter called “the immovable property”), situated at Plot No.9B, IDA, Bandlaguda Village, Patancheru, Phase-I, Medak District of the company under liquidation; not to treat the assignee as the secured creditor by virtue of the deeds of assignment in the place of the CFIs, and to calculate and pay the principal amount due to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Common Order:- Since the facts of all these petitions are one and the same and common arguments have been advanced by both the learned counsel in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order. Criminal Petition Nos.4593 and 4594 of 2012 have been filed by M/s. Jagati Publications Limited and V. Vijaya Sai Reddy (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-2’) respectively, seeking to set aside/quash the orders of the Principal Special Judge, CBI Cases, Hyderabad,(hereinafter referred to as ‘Special Judge’) dated 27.04.2012 made in R.C. No.19(A)/2011 taking cognizance of the final report submitted on 31.03.2012 and in issuing summons to the accused by assigning C.C. No.8 of 2012 and to direct the Special Judge to consider the taking of cognizance in the matter after entire investigation is completed. Criminal Petition No.4742 of 2012 has been filed challenging the order dated 28.05.2012 passed in C.C. No.8 of 2012 in R.C. No.19(A)/2011-CBI/HYD, by the Sp...
Tag this Judgment!