Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army and air force disposal of private property act 1950 section 5 decision of questions as to regimental and other debts in camp or quarters Page 1 of about 21 results (0.209 seconds)

Travels Star Hotels (India) Limited and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2009)155PLR732

..... installations may be kept free from buildings and other obstructions and no building or structure be constructed within 900 meters from the crest of the outer parapet of indian air force aerodromes and installations. (ix) annexure p.16 is letter dated 6.5.2003 mentioning that notification dated may 22, 2001 had expired. (x) annexure p ..... compliance requirement of issuing of notice or giving of compensation could be done even now. the shifting of ammunition depot was a matter of policy of the army which depended on various strategic reasons and shifting of depot was not viable. the constructions were illegal and raised after the notification and thus, no equity ..... to pass order after giving opportunity to the petitioner was issued. 6. thereafter, on collector's direction, measurement report, a copy of the plan prepared by the army authorities on a scale of 1:5000 and copies of roznamcha (proceedings register) of the patwari were produced. the said documents were shown to the petitioner. the .....

Bhanwar Lal Vs. Ramavtar

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... that the act of 2005 shall come into force with effect from such date, as the state government may, by notification in the official gazette appoint. the notification dated 22.02.2006 reads thus:- . 8 ( ) (11) / /05/ /1156:- , ( ) , ..... impugned order. . the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner with reference to issuance of notification dated 22.02.2006 bringing the provisions of the act of 2005 into force and, consequential ipso facto applicability of section 1(2) of the act of 2001 has no basis. sub-section 2 of section 1 of the act of 2005 provided ..... considered the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. 4 the issues sought to be raised by learned counsel for the petitioner regarding effect of coming into force of the act of 2005 and applicability of the act of 1950 in areas where the act of 2001 is not applicable are no more res integra and stands concluded .....

State of U.P. Vs. Civil Judge, Nainital and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC16; 1986(2)SCALE714; (1986)4SCC558; [1987]1SCR99; 1987(1)LC33(SC)

..... of uttar pradesh. she owned a fairly large extent of agricultural land. on 8.6.1973 the uttar pradesh imposition of ceiling on land holdings (amendment) act, 1972 came into force. section 5 of the uttar pradesh imposition of ceiling on land holdings act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') provided that on and from the commencement of the uttar .....

George Kurian Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(2)KLT758

..... considering the past experience, if the government is feeling that they are unable to give adequate protection, it should request the centre for deputing army or para-military forces so that there should not be any constitutional breakdown and violation of fundamental rights of the citizens;(2) the district administration should be given sufficient ..... 8. special arrangements would be made by the superintendents of police/commissioners, of police concerned in the three cities of thiruvananthapuram, calicut and ernakulam for enabling air passengers to go to airport. '9. police should promptly attend to complaints regarding designs or attempts of antisocial elements to disrupt normal life. prompt and ..... of the full bench was affirmed by the apex court in communist parry of india (m) v. bharat kumar and ors. (1997 (2) klt 1007: air 1998 sc 184). the apex court observed as follows:'........ .there cannot be any doubt that the fundamental rights of the people as a whole cannot be subservient .....

Shivendra Bikaram Singh (Ex. Lt.) Vs. Union of India(Uoi), Through the ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR695

..... ) of section 78 of the act, which provides that a person subject to naval law who commits an offence of murder against a person not subject to army, naval or air force law or an offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder against such person or an offence of rape in relation to such person shall not be tried and ..... to a significant degree, a specialized part of overall mechanism by which the military decision is preserved. it is for the special need of the armed forces that a person subject to army act is tried by court martial for an act which is an offence under the act. it is further observed that the court martial discharges judicial ..... on the part of the respondent 4 in that case who participated in and dominated the proceedings, the apex court observed thus:'the 'act' constitutes a special law in force conferring a special jurisdiction on the court martial prescribing a special procedure for the trial of the offences under the 'act'. chapter vi of the 'act' comprising of .....

Laxmi NaraIn Pande Vs. Dist. Magistrate and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All55

..... service, unlike other great professions, is not and cannot in the nature of things be an autonomous profession. in common with the royal navy, the army and the royal air force, it must always be subject to rules and regulations laid down for its guidance by his majesty's government. this written code is, in the case ..... to duty, (2) every government servant shall at all timesconduct himself in accordance with the specific orimplied orders of government regulating behaviourand conduct which may be in force.' it is noteworthy that clause (2) of this rule requires every government servant to conduct himself not only in accordance with any specific ordersof government regulating behaviour ..... though not justiciable, provide safeguard which have proved to be effective in practice. as observed by the privy council in r. venkata rao v. secretary of state air 1937 pc 81, the rules are in the nature of a 'solemn assurance that the tenure of office though at pleasure will not be subject to capricious or .....

Jolly Durga Prasad Vs. Goodricks Group Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT191(HC),1997(2)CHN364,[1999]97CompCas698(Cal)

..... kumar durgaprasad was lawful requiring protection from a court of law at anytime after the expiry of december, 1994. the ex parte ad interiminjunction which is in force in favour of the petitioners and against the company will also be of no avail to them in withholding the possession of the flat if arun kumar durgaprasad was ..... the present petitioners would be incompetent in the fact of such an injunction. in other words, the prosecution would not be maintainable so long the injunction would remain in force. thus, in view of the facts and circumstances enumerated above, it is urged on behalf of the petitioners that the criminal proceeding should be stayed till at least ..... the petition for temporary injunction. the company entered appearance in the suit and filed an application for vacating the order of injunction. but the injunction is still in force. after the death of arunkumar, the petitioners 1 and 2 had been substituted in hts place in the suit by order dated 23.4.97. the petitioners are .....

Dinkar Vishwanath Panse Vs. Jayant Vasant Joglekar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1992)94BOMLR646

..... a revision under sub-section (2) of section 31f of the bombay rent act. section 13a1 incorporates a special procedure in favour of the members of the armed forces of the union, scientists and their successors-in-interest who are entitled to recover possession of the premises bona fide required for their occupation or for occupation by ..... there was no bona fide requirement of the suit premises by the respondent. the petitioner also deposed that the fact that the respondent had booked a flat through the army housing welfare organisation and had withdrawn his membership affected the respondent's bona fides. the petitioner deposed that the respondent was comfortably housed in 'vasant prabha' in ..... to the decision of beaumont, c.j. reported in 40 bom. l.r. 125 nor to the decision of the supreme court in hari shankar's case air 1963 sc 698.10. without prejudice to the above contention as to the limited scope of powers of revision, shri lonkar further contended that section 13a1 contains a special .....

Arun Kumar S/O Sri Jai Prakash Vs. Smt. Indra W/O Sri Arun Kumar, D/O ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All406; 2006(1)AWC290

..... alleged that she had made the purchases of the items mentioned therein.29. after careful perusal of the record we do not find any force in the above contention. actually what happens is that business-men with a view to escape liability of paying trade tax do not ..... rs. 100/- were appended so as to give appearance that all the notes were of rs. 100/- each. we do not find any force in this contention. if two notes of rs. 100/- each had been affixed at the top of the two packets of the notes of ..... be celebrated at her inlaws' house. she continuously resided with arun kumar from 12.3.1988 to 30.4.1988 when she was forced at about 8 p.m. to leave the house in wearing apparel only and since then she is continuously residing with her father. arun ..... husband and the wife.'12. the above section was considered by hon'ble apex court in balkrishna r. kadam v. sangeeta b. kadam -air 1997 sc page 3652. the hon'ble apex court observed in this case as under:'it (section 27 of the act) includes the property .....

HusaIn Baksh Vs. Mr. Briggen Shaw (W.J.)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1933All597

..... protected so far as the attachment of his pay and allowances is concerned. section 136, army act, as it originally stood provided that:the pay of an officer or soldier in his majesty's regular forces shall be paid without any deductions other than the deductions authorized by this or any ..... p.c., which refers to act 8 of 1911 (army act), does not apply to the judgment-debtor, who. claims to be subject to the army act.11. our view is supported by lt. e.g.a. prins v. murray and co. ltd. air 1914 oudh 199, decided by a bench of the ..... however decide the point which has arisen before us. it has reference to a case to which the army act was applicable. our view finds further support from kering rupchdnd & co. v. g.b. murray air 1918 bom 32, decided by the bombay high court. we have considered a.l. browne v. ..... h.a. pearce air 1936 all 122, decided by a division bench of this court, in which: it was held that as the judgment- .....