Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 69 civil offences Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 50,837 results (0.354 seconds)

N.F. Chand Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1987CriLJ637

..... person decides that it should be instituted before a eourt-martial, to direct that the accused person shall be detained in military custody.5. under section 126 of (the)army act, 1950 when a criminal court having jurisdiction is of an opinion that proceedings shall be instituted before itself in respect of any alleged offence, it may, ..... petitioner before this court and opposite party no. 2 is retired lt. general jagdishwar singh nakal. the petitioner is a person subject to (the) army act, 1950. there is no dispute about it. in section 3(b)(ii) 'civil offence' has been defined as an offence which is triable by a criminal court. as between these two parties mentioned ..... of session to stand their trial. against this order, the present petition under section 482, cr.p.c. has been filed.2. section 69 of (the)army act, 1950 clearly lays down that subject to the provisions of section 70 any person subject to this act who at any place in or beyond india commits any civil offence shall be deemed .....

Gulab Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... before the summary court martial proceedings.14. indisputably, the petitioner has been tried for committing civil offence under section 69 of the army act, 1950 for abetment under section 109 ipc read with section 20(b) of the ndps act, 1983. the offence against the petitioner is abetment of his colleague in procuring and transporting 30 kgs of ganja ..... .01, followed by a supplementary petition dated 27.7.01 before the deputy inspector general hq, nagaland range (south), assam rifles, kohima under section 164 of the army act, 1950 against the impugned summary court martial proceedings dated 3.8.1999. in those two petitions, the petitioner made no allegation, not even a whisper ..... of punishment. the said writ petition was disposed of on 12.3.01 allowing him to file a petition before a competent authority under section 164 of the army act, 1950 and directing the competent authority to dispose of the petition within 2 months from the date of receipt of the said petition from the petitioner .....

Major Ss Chillar Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... that since the establishment no. 22 is not a part of the army establishment, army act and rules is not applicable as per section 4 of the army act, 1950. lt. col hk gupta was not the commanding officer as given in section 3 (v) of the army act, 1950. therefore, the court of inquiry which had been conducted by the ..... kf 10-77) was recovered under his pillow. therefore, petitioner was charged before general court martial for offence under section 5 of the explosive substance act, 1908 by virtue of section 69 of the army act, 1950. a court of inquiry was also conducted by the commandant, headquarter establishment no. 22. it is alleged that the ..... which are necessary for disposal of this petition are that the petitioner was charged for an offence under section 69 of the army act, 1950 committing a civil offence under suspicious circumstances, contrary to section of the explosive substances act, 1908. petitioner was tried by general court martial at delhi cantt from 11th august, 1987 to 18th .....

Ex. Sigmn Surendra Bahadur Singh Vs. the Chief of the Army Staff and O ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... and imposing sentences of rigorous imprisonment for nine months and dismissal from service was sought to be called in question by way of statutory complaint under section 164(2) of the army act,1950.highlighting the fact that, the complaint, submitted on 03.02.2008,had remained undecided even after expiry of the period of one month, as prescribed ..... on 21.03.2007,he was tried and convicted on his plea of guilty by a scm in respect of the following charges:- first charge (offence under section 36(d) of the army act,1950) leaving his post without orders from his superior - in that he, at dehradun, between 0400 hrs and 0600 hrs on 17 dec 2006, when on ..... her hand and catching her by trousers (salwar) intending thereby to outrage her modesty. third charge(offence under section 69 of the army act,1950) committing a civil offence, that is to say, wrongful confinement of a person, contrary to section 342 of the indian penal code in that he, at dehradun, on 17 dec 2006, wrongfully confined sh laxman .....

Khazansingh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj221

..... before me.11. it is not disputed that the four applicants before me are governed by the provisions of the army act, 1950. section 69 of the army act provides that subject to the provisions of section 70, any person subject to this act, who at any place in or beyond india commits any civil offence shall be deemed to be guilty of an ..... persons governed by the army act alone are being prosecuted. in the first category of cases the provision of section 549 read with rule 3 need not be followed if the trial has commenced and ..... been furnished, in my opinion, on the very language of section 251-a the trial did not commence.the language of section 5 (1) of the criminal law amending act, 1966 clearly makes a distinction between the two categories of cases (i) cases in which persons governed by the army act are accused along with others; and (ii) cases where .....

Piar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1985CriLJ860

..... act defines the term 'civil offence' to mean 'an offence which is triable by a criminal court'. section 69, in so far it is relevant, provides that 'any person subject to this ..... misconduct, contrary to sub-section (2) of section 5 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947'. the charge, therefore, was that the petitioner had committed a 'civil offence' and the particulars of such civil offence were specified in the words next following. in the margin of the charge-sheet, section 69 of the army act, 1950 (hereinafter called 'the act') was specifically mentioned.3. section 3(ii) of the .....

Ramesh Chandra Mohanty Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2000(II)OLR603

..... . a short point of law has been raised before this court. attention of the court has been drawn to section 69 of the army act, 1950. it is provided that subject to the provisions of section 70, any person subject to this act who at any place in or beyond india commits any civil offence shall be deemed to be guilty of an ..... detained in military custody.3. in view of the section 475 of the code of criminal procedure there is scope for delivery to commanding officers of persons liable to be tried by court-martial. it envisages that the central government may make rules consistent with this code and the army act, 1950 and any other law, relating to the armed forces ..... offence against this act and, if charged therewith under this section, shall be liable to be tried by a court-martial and, .....

Jc 171925 a Sub. Radhey Shyam Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... question it would be appropriate to look into the relevant statutory provisions. the army act, 1950 is enacted to consolidate and amend the law relating to the governance of regular army. section 2 of the act enumerates the different categories of army persons who are subject to the act. section 3(iii) defines 'civil offence' to mean an offence which is ..... article by the petitioner and in the absence of such proof, the gcm committed grave error in holding the petitioner guilty of the charge under section 69 of the army act and sentencing the petitioner thereunder. in support of his contentions, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner, also referred to a decision of the ..... 1.4.1997. the petitioner was not found guilty of the second charge and was acquitted thereof. the gcm, however, found the petitioner guilty under section 69 of the army act. on the 2nd day april, 1997, the gcm announced the sentence by awarding 4 (four) years' rigorous imprisonment as well as dismissal from service. .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. L.D. Balam Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)298; 2002(81)ECC236; JT2002(4)SC364; 2002(4)SCALE120; (2002)9SCC73; [2002]3SCR385; 2002(2)LC790(SC)

..... to the rival contentions as advanced before this court, it would be worthwhile to refer to the relevant provisions of the army act and the rules framed thereunder. chapter vi of the army act, 1950 stands ascribed to the offences and section 69 therein deals with the civil offences, which reads as below :-69. civil offences - subject to the provisions of ..... section 70, any person subject to this act who at any place in or beyond india, commits any civil offence, shall ..... and 900 grams of opium at patiala on 28th december, 1991. the charge-sheet, however, is stated to be, as noticed above, issued under section 69 of the army act by one shri s.d. singh, colonel/commanding officer 64th cavalry and it is this charge-sheet which has ben directed by the general officer commanding, .....

Radhey Shyam Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... . the moment offence under the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 is committed by member of armed force and he is tried under section 69 of army act, 1950, the relevant provisions of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 relating to offence for which the army personnel is tried would be incorporated in the army act, 1950. section 69 is a legislative device by which all civil offences ..... part of india. therefore any offences triable by any court of ordinary criminal justice will be a civil offence for the purpose of the army act, 1950. by virtue of section 69 any person, subject to army act, 1950, that is to whom the act applies commits any civil offence at any place in or beyond india, shall be deemed to be guilty of an offence against the .....