Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 22 retirement release or discharge Court: rajasthan Page 9 of about 128 results (0.102 seconds)

Bhawani Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1755; 2002(5)WLN269

..... has defined misconduct in respect of which departmental proceedings can be undertaken and the officer can be punished. 186. thus, on the one hand, part of act (sections 4 to 8) principally declares the existing position of law about requirement of regular recruitment and also permits urgent temporary appointments which to are permissible under existing provision ..... to be made to any post in any class, category or grade, it ought to be made with the prior permission of competent authority. under section 5, the act also imposes a prohibition on creation of any post in any office of establishment relating to a public service without the previous sanction of the competent ..... on an urgent temporary basis and closed all remedial avenues to persons aggrieved with such orders. 11. it will be apposite to reproduce relevant provisions of the act hereunder;- section 2 (ii) 'daily wage employee' means any person who is employed in any public service on the basis of payment of daily wages and includes a .....

Jaipur Metals and Electricals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN960

..... estimate made by an assessee on the state of its accounts as it existed on the date when he made the estimate of his income as required under section 18a(2) of the act. section 28(1)(c) does not punish the failure to revise the estimated return but an untrue estimate furnished. it is not necessary to examine other cases cited ..... do. this clearly shows that the appellant never intended to pay tax on correct basis.' the question is whether in these circumstances the provisions of section 18a(9) read with section 28(1)(c) of the act were attracted. their lordships of the supreme court in sree meenakshi mill's case air 1957 sc 50 laid down that when the point for ..... question tot answer:whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the levy of penalty of rs. 2,200/- on the asesssee under section 18a(6) read with section 28(1)(c) of the act was valid in law.2. m/s jaipur metals and electricals ltd. is a public limited company which manufactures electric meters, copppr conductors, etc. .....

The State of Rajasthan Vs. Balbir Singh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1979WLN501

..... in the police custody and that a shirt and gandasa were discovered at the instance of bholasingh in pursuance of his information recorded by sitaram under section 27 of the evidence act.18. the learned counsel for the appellant further assailed the recoveries of these articles on the ground that no evidence has been led by prosecution ..... as could reasonably be expected in the circumstances of the case and before there was opportunity for concoction, and so it cannot be admitted under section 157 of the evidence act to corroborate the evidence given by her subsequently in the trial court relating to that fact.16. likewise the evidence of gurdeo singh pw 5 ..... blood by the director state forensic science jaipur. the serologist found this shirt also stained with human blood. mr. thanchand mehta. assailed the recoveries of the armies on the ground that they were not recovered from any hidden place as the investigating agency could easily come by then without any initiative from the appellants the .....

S.R. Bhansali Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1973Raj49; 1972()WLN495

..... it is possible in a given case to call for information from the government whether a particular territory was part of india or not under section 57(10) of the indian evidence act we can certainly take judicial notice of the fact whether a particular territory is a part of india or not if there were any public ..... by the vacuum created by the expulsion of such opponent, i.e. the legitimate sovereign. both the military interest of the occupant in the security of its armies and in the continuing success of its belligerent operations, and the interest of the inhabitants themselves in resuming their ordinary pursuits and mode of living disrupted by the ..... by indian officers and meeting the expenditure out of country's funds besides the reported unfurling of the national flag by the commissioner shri k. d. ujjwal are acts which unmistakably evidence the intention of annexing of the territory by the government. in any event the intention could be ascertained by notice to the government, if any .....

Laxman Singh Vs. Arun Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj2050; 2003(2)WLC27

..... the nature of the objections raised by him and the voting papers to which those objections related. it is in the light of this background that section 83(1) of the act has to be applied to the petitions made for inspection of ballot boxes. such an application must contain a concise statement of the material facts.iv ..... subsequently, cannot be accepted. the district returning officer khemraj dw.12 was not cross examined on these lines by the petitioner. from the report under section 66 of the representation of people act (ex.d.8) it is established that application for recount was rejected then and there as no particular reason for recount was mentioned in it. ..... votes is made out by definite factual statements, credible and probative material. according to mr. joshi, learned counsel secrecy of voting is defined in section 94 of the representation of people act 1951 according to which no witness or other person can be asked as to for whom he voted at an election and if recount of votes .....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Roopkanwar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC127; 2007ACJ1394; RLW2006(2)Raj1034

..... coverage of liability the insurance company in that case was held liable to meet the claim for penalty and interest as imposed upon the insured under section 4-a(3) of the compensation act. this judgment proceeded on its own facts and was concerned with a situation converse to the one as was examined by the karnataka high court in ..... , learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the insurance company does not dispute its liability by way of compensation as well as the interest in terms of section 95(2) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, correctness of the award is challenged only as regards penalty. it was submitted that in ved prakash garg v. premi devi 1997 (8) scc ..... single judge dated 1.8.1990 in s.b. civil misc. appeal no. 86/1985 dismissing the appeal of the appellant insurance company under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (in short 'the act')2. in view of the limited controversy involved in this appeal it is not necessary to set out the facts of the case in .....

Kamla Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... according to petitioner, the government of rajasthan, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 101 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 read with sections 261 and 90 thereof and section 28 read with section 7 of the rajasthan colonisation act, 1954, made the rules of 1966 with an object to recognise and reward the members ..... "defence service" is concerned, according to interpretation placed by the respondents thereto, based on preamble of the rules, it only means the members of the indian army. but, rigor of that rule has been somewhat relaxed by its amendment because even the members of the police service have been included within the purview of the ..... to the members of the border security force or the central reserve police force, whereas the rules do not expressly restrict such benefit to only members of indian army. though, the rules of 1966, as seen from its statement of objects and reasons, intended to cover the members of all defence services. 12. this very .....

Bhojoo Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(3)Raj1916

..... ex. p. 30 and ex. p. 31. the recovery was established by the evidence of ravindra singh, 10 (pw. 9). similarly the appellant rajendra singh gave information under section 27 of evidence act about the stone, allegedly used in commission of offence, and on that basis the recovery was effected vide memo ex. p. 25. the recovery was established by the ocular ..... appellant rajendra cheated badri prasad and received a sum of rs. 48,000/- from him. rajendra knew that he was not in a position to get sardara employed in the army, but still he took sardara with him and with the help of his cousin bhojoo singh killed sardara. bhojoo singh took active part in providing assistance to rajendra in the ..... ) on december 12, 1999 rajendra took badri prasad to his house and arranged meeting with vikram singh, who promised to get the job for his son in the army if he was ready to pay a sum of rs. 50000.(iv) on december 26, 1999 rajendra went to the tea stall of badri prasad and took sardara with him. .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. S.S. Kothiyal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1995(2)WLC288; 1995(1)WLN351

..... the petitioner even in the army was a high average record otherwise he would not have been absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force. there is nothing to indicate in the proceedings the ..... recorded in the dpc proceedings that only such officers were appointed and absorbed as assistant commandant in the border security force, who had a high average record in the army and who did well during the interview. there were no interviews held for the post of deputy commandants. it, thus, leads to a conclusion that the record of ..... (respondent no. 1 in the appeal) joined as commissioned officer in the indian army as iind lieutenant on 30.6.1963. the petitioner was promoted as captain in the year 1965 and acting major in the year 1966. the petitioner was released from the army service on 16.9.1967 and was absorbed in the border security force where he .....

Ex. Pnr. Raghubir Mali Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj710

..... disability is not attributable to military service but is aggravated thereby and is assessed at 20% or more, the same would also entitle the person subject to army act to disability pension. the respondents however while resisting the claim of the petitioner have relied on the corrigendum dated 21.6.1996, copy of which is placed ..... appellant, should be respected until fresh medical board examines the appellant again and comes to different conclusion.8. regulation 48(b) of the pension regulations for army part i provides whether a disability attributable to or aggravated by military service shall be determined under rules in appendix ii. rule 4 thereof provides that in ..... by the petitioner was not attributable to, but aggravated by stress and strain of military service, which assessed his disability at 20%. however, as per the army order 417/74, it was for the competent authority i.e. the chief controller of defence accounts (pensions) allahabad, either to sanction or reject the disability .....