Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 22 retirement release or discharge Court: rajasthan Page 8 of about 128 results (0.149 seconds)

May 26 2011 (HC)

M/S Rajasthan Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Lrs. of Late Sh. Rajmal a ...

Court : Rajasthan

..... individual owners of each severed portion and can deal with that portion as also the tenant thereof as individual owner/lessor. the right of joint lessors contemplated by section 109 comes to be possessed by each of them separately and independently. there is no right in the tenant to prevent the joint owners or co-lessors from ..... nor can he sue for his part of the rent. the tenancy cannot be split up either in estate or in rent or any other obligation by unilateral act of one of the coowners. if, however, all the co-owners or the co-lessors agree among themselves and split by partition the demised property by metes ..... whereunder separate properties are allotted towards the said definite shares of the individuals. whether the said process involves transfer or not within the meaning of the transfer of property act, it certainly confers on a divided member an absolute title to a specified property, whereas before partition he had only some interest in the entire joint family property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

Prem Shanker and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2002(3)WLC471

..... the accused, who denied the charges and claimed to be tried. the prosecution examined as many as 27 witnesses and exhibited 50 documents. in the explanation under section 313 cr.p.c. the accused claimed innocence and stated that they were falsely implicated. four witnesses in defence were examined by the accused and 10 documents were ..... of prem shanker, yogesh and shatrughan as unfolded during the course of incident demonstrates that all the three had common intention which animated them to commit a criminal act in furtherance of such intention. from the evidence it is established that there was a premeditated concert to kill govind. prem shankar pulled govind out of the ..... find witness who has not made any embellishment or exaggeration and therefore, in such case court would be justified in separating the chaff from the grain and then act upon the grain. but where the evidence consists of only chaff, as in the present case, question of separating chaff from the grain would not arise. then .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1982 (HC)

H.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN321

..... dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person:(i) who is subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the navy (discipline) act, 1934 (34 of 1934) (1); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other ..... applicable to the employees whose services stood statutorily transferred to the corporation under sub-section (1) of section 11 of the act. it was urged that the impugned order does not purport to bring any uniformity in the scales or remuneration and other terms and conditions ..... integration, the same is incompetent, illegal and invalid.22. the validity of the said order was first challenged on the ground that power under sub-section (2) of section 11 can be exercised by the central government only for the purpose of securing uniformity in the scales of remuneration and other terms and conditions of services .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2013 (HC)

Lalit Shanker Vs. Smt,sunder Bai

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... . smt. sunder bai // 8 // order under chapter ix ibid, no appeal is maintainable against such an order by virtue of sub-section (2) of section 19. however, per sub-section (4) of section 19 of the act of 1984, the high court may, on its own motion or otherwise, call for and examine the record of any such proceedings in which ..... proceedings of civil nature merely because the family court is deemed to be a civil court for the purpose of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the act of 1984. the said provision of sub-section (1) of section 10 specifically relates to the proceedings other than those under chapter ix of the code of criminal procedure. therefore, the family ..... under chapter ix ibid. in our view, the answers to these questions are reasonably available in the provisions dealing with the procedure, particularly sub- section (2) of section 10 of the act of 1984 wherefrom it is clear and is beyond a pale of doubt that the provisions of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 or the rules .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1997 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dr. Sohanlal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [1998]234ITR581(Raj)

..... , the commissioner of income-tax approached this court under section 256(2) of the act. this court directed the tribunal to refer the abovementioned question along with the statement of case for its opinion. accordingly, the tribunal referred the ..... assessee in both the years under consideration shall be excluded from the computation of his income.'4. the revenue filed two reference applications under section 256(1) of the act before the tribunal requesting it to refer the abovementioned common question to this court. the said reference applications were rejected by the tribunal. thereafter ..... loan from jaimal singh...10,000total33,00033,0003. the income-tax officer did not accept the explanation offered by the assessee and passed order under section 144 of the act on march 23, 1976, and added rs. 43,627 as unexplained investment made for purchase of the said house and also made an addition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1982 (HC)

Kesardeo and ors. Vs. Hariram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN730

..... manage an endowment, dedicated to religious purpose, there is no question that the properties were applied for some other purpose by the manager in possession and section 10 of the limitation act was inapplicable. their lordships observed as under:their lordships are of opinion that the expression used by the legislature, 'for the purpose of following in ..... the plaintiffs for taking part in the management of the properties in question was barred by limitation. learned counsel for both the parties agreed that section 10 of the limitation act has no application to the facts of the present case. it is not the case of the plaintiffs that the trust properties were used for ..... over such land by the ancestors of the parties. however, in respect of issue no. 5, relating to limitation, the trial court held that section 10 of the limitation act bad no application and as she defendants had claimed adverse possession, the suit was barred by limitation.5. thus from the pleadings and evidence on record .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2009 (HC)

Bhagat Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN238

..... disability pension as disability suffered by him was attributable to military service and, therefore, the petitioner claims entitlement to the disability benefit cover under the disability cover benefit scheme of army group insurance fund, which has been denied by the respondents; hence this petition.3. i have heard learned counsel fro the parties.4. it is contended by learned ..... counsel for petitioner that the petitioner was a member of army group insurance scheme and this act has not been disputed by the respondent union of india as also by respondent no. 2 and 3 i.e. the managing director ..... , army group insurance fund etc. so far as case of the petitioner that he joined army on 12.08.1987 and served up to 31.01.2005 the date on which he was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2009 (HC)

Rajvan Devi (Smt.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN273

..... the unit where he was posted on 04.02.1998 and that consequent upon the report of court of enquiry, he was declared deserter as per the provisions under section 106 of the army act. according to assertion made by the respondents, apprehension roll had to be issued for husband of the petitioner to superintendent of police, jhunjhunu, sho police station, ..... proper enquiry/investigation reported back to respondents about the fact that husband of the petitioner was not traceable, in such an event, the consequence of law emanating from section 108 of the indian evidence act would follow and husband of the petitioner would be deemed to have attained civil death, in view of the aforesaid provisions of ..... section 108, which provides that when a question arises whether a man is alive or dead, and it is proved that he has not been heard of for seven .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1978 (HC)

Parihar (Priti) Vs. Parihar (Kailash Singh)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1978Raj140; 1978(11)WLN137

..... the husband preferred an application on january 11, 1972, for judicial separation on the grounds of desertion and mental cruelty under section 10 of the hindu marriage act, 1955, which shall hereinafter be called the act. the act was amended on may 24, 1972. it was later on converted into a petition for divorce on july 7, 1976, ..... troubled himself on misinformation and imagination. i agree however that the subsequent conduct did cause to him mental cruelty. the complaint, which the wife made to the army authorities could do him immense harm. the irresponsible insinuations and allegations which were made during the course of litigation against the husband and his family cannot be ..... which certainly were written as also as held by the court below, upon legal advice. he was openly accusing her of objectionable relations or association with an army captain and a childhood and family friend ramesh. he was refusing to maintain her and their child. the wife was bound to feel hurt at the unfounded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1989 (HC)

Khalid Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1989(2)WLN198

..... emperor air 1947 pat. 90 and sitalsingh and ors. v. emperor air 1920 neal 30. it was clearly ruled that such a statement was not admissible under section 30 of the evidence act against others. locked, therefore, from any angle the alleged telephonic conversation in the presence of the superintendent of police is not at all admissible in evidence as ..... of facts constituting the offence. even if there was any confession, it was made before a police officer and it was inadmissible by the virtue of section 25 of the evidence act which clearly provides that no confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence. no less fatal is the ..... the document recovered from the possession of balbeer singh was a sheet of paper and there was an entry in it of june 1984 mentioning 'army operation' felt like killing', 'beant singh/eagle meeting act. it was observed in relation to this document that there was no reference in it to a killing of the prime minister. in fact .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //