Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 173 communication of certain orders to prison officers Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 270 results (0.081 seconds)

Shri.basappa S/o Kallappa Iragar Vs. M/s.r.n.s Tracking

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , which was ridden by the deceased suresh was less than 100cc capacity and riding the said motorcycle without dl with pillion rider is contrary to section 140(3) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. hence, he seeks to allow the appeals filed by the insurance company by holding that the deceased was negligent in riding the motorcycle ..... to the motorcycle.11. learned counsel smt. sunanda patil would further submit that after investigation, the police filed charge sheet against the deceased suresh under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act and not under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc. the driver of the offending jeep was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under ..... it is evident that the charge sheet is filed against the deceased rider for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act, however, charge sheet is filed against the driver of mahindra jeep for the offence punishable under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc, which further makes it clear that the driver of the offending .....

The Divisional Manager Vs. Sri.basappa S/o. Kalappa Iragar

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , which was ridden by the deceased suresh was less than 100cc capacity and riding the said motorcycle without dl with pillion rider is contrary to section 140(3) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. hence, he seeks to allow the appeals filed by the insurance company by holding that the deceased was negligent in riding the motorcycle ..... to the motorcycle.11. learned counsel smt. sunanda patil would further submit that after investigation, the police filed charge sheet against the deceased suresh under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act and not under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc. the driver of the offending jeep was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under ..... it is evident that the charge sheet is filed against the deceased rider for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act, however, charge sheet is filed against the driver of mahindra jeep for the offence punishable under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc, which further makes it clear that the driver of the offending .....

The Divisional Manager Vs. Sri.ravindra Appasaheb Kadalagi

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , which was ridden by the deceased suresh was less than 100cc capacity and riding the said motorcycle without dl with pillion rider is contrary to section 140(3) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. hence, he seeks to allow the appeals filed by the insurance company by holding that the deceased was negligent in riding the motorcycle ..... to the motorcycle.11. learned counsel smt. sunanda patil would further submit that after investigation, the police filed charge sheet against the deceased suresh under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act and not under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc. the driver of the offending jeep was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under ..... it is evident that the charge sheet is filed against the deceased rider for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act, however, charge sheet is filed against the driver of mahindra jeep for the offence punishable under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc, which further makes it clear that the driver of the offending .....

Shri.ravindra S/o Appasaheb Kadalagi Vs. M/s.r.n.s Tracking

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , which was ridden by the deceased suresh was less than 100cc capacity and riding the said motorcycle without dl with pillion rider is contrary to section 140(3) of the motor vehicles act, 1988. hence, he seeks to allow the appeals filed by the insurance company by holding that the deceased was negligent in riding the motorcycle ..... to the motorcycle.11. learned counsel smt. sunanda patil would further submit that after investigation, the police filed charge sheet against the deceased suresh under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act and not under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc. the driver of the offending jeep was charge sheeted for the offence punishable under ..... it is evident that the charge sheet is filed against the deceased rider for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 181 of the mv act, however, charge sheet is filed against the driver of mahindra jeep for the offence punishable under sections 279, 338 and 304a of ipc, which further makes it clear that the driver of the offending .....

H.A. Gopinath S/O H.N. Anathraman and Vs. the Special Land Acquisition ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ500

..... 3rd respondent had ceased to be the owner and the writ petitioners had acquired titled to the schedule property. however, after receiving notice under section 12(2) of the land acquisition act, writ petition no. 51392 of 2004 is filed contending that what is acquired as per the acquisition proceedings by the respondents-1 and 2 ..... petitions is the same and there was a mistake in mentioning the name of the village in the notice issued to the appellants herein under section 12(2) of the land acquisition act. after the issuance of the preliminary notification, bangalore east taluk was formed and the same was carved out of the portion of the ..... is further averred that a public notice was issued on 03.02.2003 regarding the acquisition proceedings under sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 17 of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 and section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894 in respect of the schedule property. the petitioners filed objections to the said notifications dated 03.02. .....

Mahadevappa Vs. Karnataka Lokayuktha and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR947

..... -martial under the provisions of the cr.p.c. but, they were conducted in accordance with the special procedure prescribed under the army act. therefore, the apex court held that such being the position, the provision of set-off in section 428 of the cr.p.c. can never be attracted in the case of persons convicted and sentenced by courts-martial to ..... : 1987crilj1877 , is concerned, that was a case where the question involved was whether the set-off provision contained in section 428 of the cr.p.c. can be pressed into service in respect of the proceedings under the army act. the apex court considered sections 4 and 5 of the cr.p.c. and found that neither the investigation nor the enquiry and not .....

Vijayakumar B. Jiragyal Vs. Chief of the Army Staff and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(3)KarLJ550

..... mr. visweshwara, learned senior counsel, let me see as to whether the order requires my interference in the given circumstances.9. army act of 1950 is an act to consolidate and amend the law relating to the government of the regular army. section 40 provides for punishment of imprisonment of a term which my extend to 14 years in the event of a person committing ..... on the head of captain rajesh masurkar. a charge-sheet was issued to him. he was charged for using criminal force to his superior in terms of section 40(a) of the army act.1.1 he was punished with the sentence of ri for 28 days with effect from 21-4-1998 to 18-5-1998. on 25-5-1998. ..... an offence of using criminal force to or assaults a superior officer, in the case on hand petitioner is charged under section 40 .....

(Ex. Naik Clerk, G.D.) Ganeshan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR1045]

..... was called upon to show cause as to why his services could not be terminated under the provisions of para 333 of the regulations for the army lead with army act, 1950. section 20 and army rule 17. a show-cause notice is at annexure-j. the petitioner submitted a detailed reply objecting to the allegations in terms of annexure-c. ..... restraining the respondent from carrying out the discharge from service in terms of the army act, 1950, section 22 read with clause iii(v) of the table to army rule 13 for contracting plural marriage in violation of para 333-c(a) of the reductions for the army, 1987. the petitioner is challenging annexure-a in the given circumstances.5. notice ..... the principle stated by the supreme court in major radhakrishan's case would be applicable to the facts of the case. it was noticed therein that section 122 of the army act is a complete code in itself for not only it provides the period of limitation but also the offences in respect of which limitation clause would .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Xi Additional Chief Metropolitan Mag ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2002(5)KarLJ275

..... proceedings held at secunderabad. a witness staying in bangalore is required for examination. the summons were issued to the witness through magistrate under the provisions of section 135(3) of the army act. therefore, the assistant judge, advocate general, headquarters, southern command, made a request to chief metropolitan magistrate for issuance of warrant of arrest to the witness ..... the court declined to issue warrant of arrest by itself and thus rejected the request. being aggrieved, the present revision petition is filed. 4. the provisions of section 135 of the army act reads thus: '(1) the convening officer, the presiding officer of a court-martial, the judge, advocate or the commanding officer of the accused person may, by ..... to issue the warrant or arrest as prayed for. further, it is directed that the execution of warrant of arrest to be entrusted to the army authorities in view of the provisions contained in section 72 of the cr. p.c. accordingly, the petition is disposed off.

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... notification, and therefore the quashing of the said notification is inconsequential, as far as those petitioners are concerned. thus, when sub-section (1) of section 98-a of the act refers to disposal of forest produce by the state government or a corporation, owned or controlled by the state government, in such ..... forest development corporation (kfdc) or such other bodies including societies dealing with forest produce could come within the nomenclature used in sub-section (1) of section 98-a of the act, but the impugned notification dated 16/08/2008 cannot include mining lease holders within the nomenclature "body notified". (p) with reference ..... of fencing, bridges and culverts, dams, water holes, trench marks, boundary marks, pipelines or other like purposes. (d) environment (protection) act, 1986: sub-section (3) of section 3 of the environment (protection) act, 1986 reads as under:- 3. power of central government to take measures to protect and improve environment: (1) x x x (2 .....