Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 16 persons to be attested Court: chennai Page 8 of about 97 results (0.084 seconds)

Kodi Idi Kondaiyan Chettiar Vs. P. Sivasamy and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC641; (1998)IIIMLJ754

..... it stands...'. 12. in india, it has to be decided in the light of sections 111 and 108(e) of the transfer of property act 1882. section 108(e) of transfer of property act reads as follows:- 'if by fire, tempest or flood, or violence of any army or of a mob, or other irresistible force, any material part of the property be ..... in dhruv dev v. harmohinder singh, : [1968]3scr339 has held as follows:- 'if any material part of the property be wholly destroyed or rendered substantially and permanently unfit for the purpose for which it was let out,because of fire, tempest, flood, violence of an army or a ..... wholly destroyed or rendered substantially and permanently unfit for the purposes for which it was let, the lease shall, at the option of the lessee, be void'.while dealing with the scope of section 108(e) of the said act, the apex court .....

B.M. Habibullah, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad222; (1994)IMLJ229

..... the file produced containing the notices issued to the petitioners in w.p. nos. 5659 to 5661 of 1992 are in accordance with the provisions of the act. a notice under section 5 of the act was issued to the petitioner in w.p. no, 5659 of 1992. it does not bear any date. in the said notice, it was mentioned that the ..... that he has been assessed to house-tax and his application for permanent assignment was pending. he would also state that on 11-4-1992, the 1st respondent accompanied by army of officials demolished his shop unauthorisedly and illegally. 5. w.p. no. 5660 of 1992 is fded by one k.i. vargheese, who claims to carry on business, a general ..... the business for the year 1992-93 and also obtained a drug licence under the provisions of drug.-, and cosmetics act. it is stated by the petitioner that on 11-4-1992 without any notice and justification, the 1st respondent and an army of revenue and police officials demolished bis, shop and 22 other shops by using buldozer. it is also stated .....

M. Latha Vs. Government of India, Rep. by the Defence Secretary New De ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... serve in the regular air force reserve for such further period or periods not exceeding in the aggregate 5 years as it may think fit vide section 7 of the reserve and auxiliary air force act, 1952. (c) in the case of airmen who are discharged before the expiry of their regular engagement, the period of the unexpired portion ..... outlined in the above quoted order of the principal bench aft, period of reserve service needs to be taken into reckoning for making him eligible for pension under section 136(a) of the pension regulations for air force 1961. the amount paid as gratuity would be liable to be recovered from or adjusted in the pension payable ..... 353987 as mentioned in the o.a. the original service records in respect of the petitioner had been destroyed after the stipulated period of 25 years in accordance with section 6, chapter xviii of regulation 1026 of regulations for the air force. important details are retained in the form of long roll which the respondents produced and according .....

M. Asoan D. Sheam (Minor) Represented by Mother Usha as Guardian Vs. P ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ778

..... to the notice, the following decisions:-(1) 1990-2 law weekly, 279 (r.geetha - vs. - a.t. ranjan). in that case this court has observed:- 'guardians and wards act, (8 of 1890), sections 9(1) and 25 - 'ordinarily resides', meaning of - application by father for custody of child living with its mother who is separated from her husband - jurisdiction of the court ..... last at the parental house of the husband, it cannot be the place where they can be said to have, in law, last resided, within the meaning of section 19(iii) of the act.' (2) 2001(2) c.t.c. 302 (dr. david chakravarthy arumainayagam and another - vs. - geetha chakravarthy arumainayagam and another). this court has held:- 'question of jurisdiction can be .....

Estate of Late Rangalal Jajodia Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1966]61ITR726(Mad)

..... left open by him.pursuant to the directions of the appellate assistant commissioner, further proceedings were taken. in answer to the notice of the income-tax officer acting under sections 24b, 23(3) and 31, aruna devi appeared and asked for copies of the return and notes on examination and enquiry and the letters written by ..... was that was comprehended by the expression 'any person' in the second proviso, and it was pointed out :'a combined reading of section 30(1) and section 31(3) of the act indicates the cases where persons other than the appearing assessees might be affected by orders passed by the appellate assistant commissioner. modification or setting ..... tax officer to make fresh assessments on the two executors, viz., sri ramkumar bhuwalka and srimathi aruna devi jajodia in accordance with the provisions of section 24b of the act.' it may be seen that the appellate assistant commissioner decided the appeal mainly with reference to the capacity of sankarlal jajodia to figure as the .....

Malar Network (P) Ltd. Vs. Arun Prasath D.

Court : Chennai

..... malar tv" with lotus flower logo as in page 35. it is no doubt true that he is entitled to the benefits under the provisions of trademarks act. according to section 30 (1) of the act, prima - facie right over the said mark is established by the appellant.15. however, it is the argument of the respondent that it does not ..... the different names of the appellant and respondent, we are of the firm view that there is no prima - facie case for infringement. therefore, the provisions of section 31 of trademarks act are not applicable to the present case.19. considering the absence of any prima - facie case in favour of the appellant / plaintiff and if for any reason ..... tv" in the website by the respondent is clearly infringing the right of the appellant. he would draw the attention of the court to the ingredients of section 31(1) of trademarks act in support of his arguments. he would once again stressed in his argument that when once prima-facie case is established on the part of the appellant, .....

imperial Corporate and Services (P) Limited Vs. Aruna Sugars and Enter ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ750

..... the statutory notice dated 17.8.99 sent by the petitioner, the respondent has duly replied denying their liability. there is no recoverable debt in terms of section 433(e) of the act, hence the petition is not maintainable. the amount claimed is disputed one. the remedy is to file a civil suit. all other claims then settled by ..... sense that the creditor is entitled to its payment present, there is a relationship of a debtor and creditor....11. an order under section 433(e) is discretionary and the court has to act on the basis of facts of each case on the available materials before exercising its-discretion and come to a decision.'there is no ..... filed the above company petition under section 433(e) , 434 and 439 of the companies act for winding up of the respondent company namely aruna sugars and enterprises limited, chennai-34.2. the case of the petitioner is briefly, stated hereunder: the respondent company was incorporated on 9.9.60 under the companies act, 1956. the nominal capital of .....

R. Sivagnanam Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1980)1MLJ441

..... become an industrial dispute under section 22 of the payment of bonus act, 1965 and not an individual dispute between an employer and an employee with respect to the bonus payable to that particular employee. however, we feel ..... 1180, proceeded on the basis that even an individual dispute relating to bonus between an employer and an individual workman will become an industrial dispute under section 22 of the payment of bonus act, while a full bench of the andhra pradesh high court took the view that it is only the collective dispute with respect to bonus that will ..... was that the petitioner was employed as a branch manager in their salem branch and as such he was not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the industrial disputes act. further it was contended that the labour court at coimbatore had no jurisdiction to entertain the petitioner's claim, as on the date of the .....

1.M/S.Sree Balaji Engineering Works, Vs. 1.R.Stephon Johnson

Court : Chennai

..... is very well maintainable as per sub-section (1) of section 8 of the act.12. as aforestated, section 8 of the act, provides that where there is an arbitration agreement, the judicial authority is bound to direct the parties to resort to arbitration ..... jurisdiction of the trial court. in fact, prior to the filing of their written statement, they have come forward with this petition under section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, to enforce the arbitration agreement under clause (3) of the abovesaid settlement deed dated 23.5.2012. therefore, the petition itself ..... this court is of the view that it would be better to have reference to the provisions of section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. section 8 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 reads as under:- ?.section 8: power to refer parties to arbitration when there is an arbitration agreement.--:- (1) a judicial .....

P. Murugan Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

..... the law may well be an elusive and unsafe guide and the supposed spirit can certainly not be given effect to in opposition to the plain language of the sections of the act. (viii) in hari prasad shivashanker shukla v. a.d.divelkar reported in air 1957 sc 121, the hon'ble apex court held that, it is true that an ..... could be a cause to file any other application, by any person, other than the challenge to any of the measures taken by the secured creditor, under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the act and in such circumstances, there could be a scope to contend that the court fee payable, as per rule 13(2)(1)(e) would be rs.200 ..... deficit court fee, request of the writ petitioner is reasonable and therefore, we are inclined to grant two weeks time to pay the deficit court fee required under section 18 of the sarfaesi act, 2002, read with rule 13(2)(1) of the security interest (enforcement) rules, 2002 and represent the appeal papers. on such payment and representation, the tribunal shall .....