Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 15 validity of enrolment Court: chennai Page 18 of about 212 results (0.213 seconds)

M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs. P. Arunachalam and Others

Court : Chennai

..... parliament. accordingly, we direct the central government to do so immediately. till such amendment is made by the central government in exercise of power vested under sub-section (3) of section 163a of act, 1988 or amendment is made by the parliament, we hold and direct that for children upto the age of 5 years shall be entitled for fixed compensation of ..... and fifty thousand) or the amount may be determined in terms of second schedule whichever is higher. such amount is to be paid if any application is filed under section 163a of the act, 1988.(iii) a decision of this court in the case of new india assurance co. ltd. vs. k.jothilingam and others (2011 acj 333) 23. now ..... of the deceased from the two-wheeler even as per the fir vide ex.p1 and the evidence of p.w.2, the claim petition filed under section 166 of the motor vehicles act is not maintainable and it ought to have been dismissed by the tribunal. he would further contend that the tribunal ought to have reduced the compensation under .....

M/s. Eris Life Science Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad Vs. M/s. Micro Labs Ltd. B ...

Court : Chennai

..... upon in the suit by the plaintiff, this is not a fit case for the grant of an injunction, but in view of the sub section (5) of section 111 of the act, the court is not precluded from giving relief in the intervening period and accordingly, the defendants are directed to furnish security of rs.10,000/- ..... s trade mark not put in use and only proposed to be used. the applicant/original defendant has filed an application exercising statutory right provided under section 124 of the trademarks act, 1999, for rectification of the trademark. therefore, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant/original defendant that once the rectification ..... applicant /original defendant that the trademark "olamin" of the respondent/original plaintiff is not registrable as it is inn name which cannot be registered as per section 13 of trademarks act, 1999 and the respondent/original plaintiff is not the bona fide user among other grounds. when the matter came up before this court, this court, .....

J. Veeraraghavan Vs. Lalith Kumar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas853(Mad)

..... more reasons can also fall under these two heads, though the nomenclature of the return, may not specifically mention these two contingencies referred to in section 138 of the act. to put it differently, the reasons for which a cheque stands returned without being honoured will have to be relegated for consideration during trial, ..... being unpaid was really insufficiency of funds or inadequate arrangement. unless such an allegation was made in the complaint, the complaint would not disclose an offence under section 138 of the act. 3. arunachalam j. would refer to the aforesaid decisions of pratap singh j. and padmini jesudurai j. and then say: '. . . after ..... been pinpointed in the endorsement itself, viz., that payment was countermanded by the drawer. such a case would not come within the ambit and scope of section 138, negotiable instruments act.' (c) in prasanna (s.) v. vijayalakshmi (r.) , pratap singh j., while deciding if a cheque returned unpaid with an endorsement 'account closed .....

Veeraraghavan Vs. Lalith Kumar

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1882

..... observations extracted below are very relevant :- 'from the argument advanced by the learned counsel representing the petitioner, it would appear that an offence under section 138 of the act should depend on the endorsement made by the banker while returning the cheque unpaid, i.e., only when the banker makes an endorsement that the ..... more reasons can also fall under these two heads, though the nomenclature of the return, may not specifically mention these two contingencies referred to in section 138 of the act. to put it differently, the reason for which, a cheque stands returned, without being honoured, will have to be relegated for consideration during trial ..... being unpaid was really insufficiency of funds or inadequate arrangement. unless such an allegation was made in the complaint, the complaint would not disclose an offence under section 138 of the act. 4. arunachalam, j. would refer to the aforesaid decisions of pratap singh, j. and padmini jesudurai, j. and then say : '..... after .....

Dr. M.R. Reddy, Retired Wing Commander Versus the Station Commander, S ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... vacate the government accommodation forthwith, failing which damages would be collected from 1st december 1999 and eviction proceedings would follow under the public premises act 1971. 3(c)the army has in their sao 10/s/86 in appendix e declared the places where separated family accommodation are available to officers. the first ..... permitted to retain family accommodation till receipt of clarification. on 29.09.1999, the first respondent was clarified that the separated family accommodation specifically built for army personnel is not available to persons of other services and further the first respondent was directed to advice the petitioner to contact air force station, tambaram ..... in its letter no.100200/q3 dated 18.12.1999, had confirmed the non-entitlement for allotment of separated family accommodation to the petitioner from army pool of accommodation. the petitioner was posted to an air force hospital and so he can claim family accommodation from air force station at tambaram alone .....

Ex.Hav.(Clk)parthiban Versus Govt of India, Ministry of Defence – ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... that his disability was neither attributed to nor aggravated by service conditions and was therefore not recommended for disability pension for the applicant. the applicant was discharged from army service on 01.11.2001 with only service pension. ccda (pension), allahabad (now pcda) has also rejected the petitioners disability pension. the second respondent in ..... 3rd respondent on the basis of the opinion of the release medical board, dated 30.07.2001, is liable to be set aside and can not be acted upon. 10. per contra, the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant was vehemently opposed by the jag officer lt col sandeep kumar, who ..... respective submissions. 7. the point for determination in this application is whether the disability diagnosed as cone rod macular dystrophy to the applicant is attributable to the army service or is constitutional as contended by the respondents to reject the claim of disability pension and attendant allowance? 8.the point:- the learned counsel for .....

K.P.Perumal Vs. the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment.

Court : Chennai

..... with the appellants' preliminary objection that the respondent's writ petition was not maintainable as being premature. it was the respondent's case that the chief of the army staff had no jurisdiction to issue the impugned show cause notice after he had been again found not guilty by the court-martial on revision. the said notice ..... and he being removed or dismissed from services. were the said notice issued without jurisdiction, the respondent would have then suffered a grave, prejudicial injury by an act which was without jurisdiction. where the threat of a prejudicial action is wholly without jurisdiction, a person cannot be asked to wait for the injury to be caused ..... the competent authority, who has to either reject or accept it.34. it is not within jurisdiction of this court to issue direction to the competent authority to act in a particular manner and accept the enquiry report. the contention of the learned senior counsel, that enquiry being by the hon'ble retired judge of this court .....

M. LenIn (Ex Sepoy 2604698 H) Vs. Union of India – Represented by ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... which the person to be discharged belongs except that in the case of junior commissioned officers and warrant officers of the special medical section of the army medical corps, the commanding officer means the director of the medical services, army, and in the case of junior commissioned officer and warrant officers of remounts, veterinary and farms, corps, the commanding officer means the director ..... remounts, veterinary and farms. tablecategorygrounds of dischargecompetent authority to authorize dischargemanner of discharge1234persons enrolled under the act who have been attested.iii.(v)all other classes of discharge .....

C. Munisamy Versus Government of Inida, Ministry of Defence – Rep ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... enrolment was 17 years and re-mustered as trained sapper with effect from 19.08.1946. he was a trained soldier in terms of new constitution on 26th january, 1950. the petitioner was transferred to reserve establishment with effect from 18.08.1955. the petitioner was discharged from reserve service with effect from 01.10.1961. thereafter, the ..... . further, the 4th respondent had also recovered the service pension paid to the petitioner from his civil pension. the 5th respondent has also informed the petitioner that his army service rendered from 19.08.1946 to 12.08.1955 was counted towards his civil service and his revised civil pension was fixed at rs.1,454/- with effect ..... due till the date of payment and for costs. the said writ petition was transferred to this tribunal, after the formation of the same under the armed forces tribunal act 2007, and renumbered as t.a.no.49 of 2009. 2. the averments in the affidavit to the petition in brief relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition .....

N Ramachandran Versus Union of India Represented by Secretary to Govt. ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... provisions including that of the guidelines called the guide to medical officers (military pensions) 1980 and also the source of power, i.e., the provision of section 173 of the pension regulations including other relevant provisions came to be considered by the supreme court. a conjoint reading of the aforesaid provisions along with the ..... dated 29.12.2003 from the third respondent informing that the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the rejection of disability petition was not considered by the army headquarters in favour of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner has not presented any responsible grounds for the abnormal delay. hence the petitioner has ..... the writ petition no.16826 of 2004 for disability pension after he was discharged from the army service on 16.10.1963 on medical ground of idiopathic epilepsy . after the constitution of this tribunal under the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, this writ petition was transferred and the same was taken on file by this .....