Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 15 validity of enrolment Court: chennai Page 13 of about 212 results (1.458 seconds)

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

The Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...

Court : Chennai

..... discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a ..... .contemplates the payment of fifteen days average pay for every completed year of service at the time of retrenchment and retrenchment is defined under section 2(oo) of the act as follows:section 2(oo) retrenchment means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a ..... ***(b) the prior permission of the appropriate government or such authority as may be specified by that government by notification in the official gazette (hereafter in this section referred to as the specified authority) has been obtained on an application made in this behalf requires prior permission of the appropriate government on the application made before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2001 (TRI)

Sirius Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

Reported in : (2002)257ITR38(Chennai)

..... in force, (section 41 of the indian evidence act), the act or process of operating, action or movements (section 3(1)(a), army act) working section 2(d) of the transfer of property act (section 12(a) damodar valley corporation act) a surgical operation (section 88(iii) i. p. c.) working to keep running (section 63a(2)(a) of the motor vehicles act). the various ..... be owned by the assessee, whereas the legislature consciously has not mentioned about the ownership of the asset for claiming the deduction under section 33ac of the act. even under section 28 the ownership of the business is not the main criteria for levy of tax. in this connection reference is invited to page ..... the commissioner (appeals)-iv, chennai, wherein the subject-matter was the assessment order for the relevant assessment year passed by the assessing officer under section 143(3) of the act. there is a delay of 113 days in filing this appeal by the assessee-company. the assessee had also filed a condonation petition along .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1945 (PC)

In Re: CaptaIn Hugh May Stollery Mundy, Commanding Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1945Mad289; (1945)1MLJ388

..... and convicted the accused did not act in accordance with law.2. by reason of section 549 of the code of criminal procedure the central government may make rules consistent with the code and the army act, the naval discipline act and that act as modified by the indian navy (discipline) act and the air force act and any similar law for ..... force law is brought before a magistrate and charged with an offence for which he is liable under the army act, the naval discipline act, the navy discipline act as modified by the indian the (discipline)act, 1934,orthe air force act to be tried by a court-martial, me magistrate shall not proceed to try him, or to issue ..... collins, an engine-room mechanic, who has been sentenced to three months rigorous imprisonment for an offence under section 304-a of the indian penal code and rigorous imprisonment for one month under section 116 of the motor vehicles act. the other matter is an application by the accused for the revision of his conviction and sentence. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 1970 (HC)

S.P. Shanmugham Chettiar, Managing Director, Jai Hind Talkies (Paramak ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1970)2MLJ245

..... j. 447 : (1969) 1 s.c.j. 835. that case dealt with an order passed by the central government under the army act, confirming a decision of the court martial under section 164 of the act, which defined the powers of the confirming authority. the supreme court held that in such a case it is not necessary for the confirming ..... authority to write a speaking order. in our opinion, this decision must be interpreted in the light of the army act, which contains special provisions ..... . 'local area' for this purpose is defined as 'the area within the jurisdiction of a municipal council or panchayat board or revenue village.' section 11 of the madras cinemas regulation act (madras act ix of 1955) gives power to the state government, by order in writing to exempt, subject to such conditions and restrictions as they may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2014 (HC)

M.Rajendran Vs. 1.The Management of Arul Anandar College,

Court : Chennai

..... , discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-- (i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; ..... less, acceptable evidence, tendered on behalf of the appellant to prove their stand that the first respondent was not a ".workman". as defined under section 2(s) of the industrial disputes act of 1947, the award impugned, in the writ petition rejecting the claim of the first respondent solely on that ground cannot be sustained. the award ..... the workman herein was discharging only the supervisory functions.18. before analysing this issue, this court feels that it is worthwhile to refer to section 2(s) of the i.d. act and it reads thus: ".section 2(s).- ".workman". means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, unskilled, skilled, technical, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2012 (HC)

The Principal General Manager Vs. the Central Govt. Industrial Tribuna ...

Court : Chennai

..... dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute. the last segment of the definition specifies certain exclusions. a person to whom the air force act, 1950, or the army act, 1950, or the navy act, 1957, is applicable or who is employed in the police service as an officer or other employee of a prison or who is employed mainly in ..... a workman.14. whenever an employer challenges the maintainability of industrial dispute on the ground that the employee is not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the act, what the labour court/industrial tribunal is required to consider is whether the person is employed in an industry for hire or reward for doing manual ..... way as to further the statutory goal and not to frustrate it. in doing so this court should make an effort to protect the rights of the weaker sections of the society in view of the clear constitutional mandate discussed above. thus, social justice, the very signature tune of our constitution and being deeply embedded in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1985 (HC)

N.R. Chinnasamy Chettiar and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1986Mad168

..... v. union of india, : 1969crilj663 the supreme court held that there was no express obligation imposed by s. 164 or by s. 165 of the army act, on the confirming authority or upon the central government to give reasons in support of its decision to confirm the proceedings of the court-martial. the court went ..... essentially a power of superintendence.'basing on this observation, the learned government pleader would contend that the government exercising revisional power under s. 9(b) of the act is exercising a power of superintendence and while exercising such a power, the revisional authority need not disclose the reasons for its orders. this contention cannot be ..... : air1983mad134 , a single judge of this court while dealing with a writ petition arising out of an order of revision under the tamil nadu cinemas (regulation) act, ruled that when there is total absence of reasons and not even reference to the reasons recorded by the appellate authority, that disclosed total lack of application of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1985 (HC)

N.R. Chinnasamy Chettiar and anr. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Represe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1985)2MLJ383

..... the appeal.9. in som datt v. union of india : 1969crilj663 , the supreme court held that there was no express obligation imposed in section 164 or by section 165 of the army act on the confirming authority or upon the central government to give reasons in support of its decision to confirm the proceedings of the court martial. the ..... and ors. v. rangaswamy chettiar : air1980sc1253 . that decision was in a matter arising under the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960. the provisions of section 25 of the act provides that the revisional authority has to satisfy itself as to the regularity of the proceedings or correctness or legality or propriety of any decision passed ..... the reasons for its orders. this contention cannot be accepted, nor the observation of the supreme court yields itself to such a stretched view. under section 9(b) of the act, a revision by the government can take place on their own motion, or on application. when the matter is taken up by the government on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2002 (HC)

Pallavan Transport Corporation (Metro) Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Simrose,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ101Mad

..... managerial or administrative capacity, or who holds a civil post under the central government or a state government, or who is subject to the air force act, 1950, the army act, 1950, or the navy act, 1957.'a perusal of the said provision makes it clear that a person, who was holding a civil post under the central government or state government ..... was holding a civil post under the state government at the relevant time. since he was not considered to be an employee within the meaning of section 2(e) of the act, the period of service rendered by him under the government cannot be counted for the purpose of payment of gratuity. 5. the interpretation given by ..... state government in the transport department would not be counted for the purpose of computing gratuity. for the above purpose, he has placed reliance on section 2(e) of the payment of gratuity act. since the question of payment of gratuity arose on the retirement in the year 1981, the relevant provision containing the payment of gratuity .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1963 (HC)

Michael Villavarayar and Anr. Vs. Workmen, represented by Secy. Boatme ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1963Mad351; (1963)IILLJ203Mad

..... discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the navy (discipline) act, 1934. (34 of 1934); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of ..... ms. no. 3375 (lab) dated 5-10-1959 the government referred this matter as an industrial dispute to the labour court at madurai, under section 10 of the industrial disputes act (act xiv of 1947). the management (michaei villavarayar, the writ petitioner and the appellant herein) urged as a preliminary ground that the court did not have ..... office or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.' we might here usefully extract the definition of 'industrial dispute' in section 2(k), which is to the following effect: 'industrial dispute' means, any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //