Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: armed forces tribunal act 2007 section 30 appeal to supreme court Sorted by: old Court: kolkata appellate Page 1 of about 56 results (0.780 seconds)

Development Consultants Pvt. Vs. Dcit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2008)115TTJ(Kol.)577

..... ). 5. before proceeding to discuss the determination of alp on transaction by transaction basis, shri mitra submitted that as per section- 92c(1) of the it act. the arm's length price of an international transaction is required to be determined using any of the prescribed methods, being the most appropriate method-having regard to the ..... by the tpo and accordingly the assessing officer in the appeals relating to both the said assessment years, whereupon the assessee has filed, second appeals before the tribunal.16. shri rahul mitra and shri vrajesh dutia of pwc, being authorized representatives (ars) argued the case on behalf of the assessee before us by filing ..... to refer to the transfer pricing legislations of developed countries where the principles of transfer pricing have been in use for a long time and act as a guiding force for all the developing economies. the transfer pricing guidelines issued by the us internal revenue services under section 482 provide and discuss the concept of .....

Rabi Kumar Das. Vs. Sumitra Bala Dasi and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. This application is at the instance of the defendant no.1(ka) and is directed against the order no.174 dated March 3, 2009 passed by the learned Judge (Junior Division), Second Court, Bolpur, District - Birbhum in Title Suit No.38 of 1989 thereby rejecting the petition dated February 19, 2009 filed by him.2. The short fact is that in an appeal arising out of the said title suit, the petitioner/appellant filed a petition under Order 41 Rule 27 of the C.P.C. in the said title appeal being Title Appeal No.17 of 1998. That application was filed for marking a certain Deed of Sale dated April 25, 1999 as exhibit. That application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the C.P.C. was rejected, but, the suit was remanded back directing the parties to adduce evidence. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the said petition dated February 19, 2009 for marking the Deed of Sale as exhibit, which was rejected by the impugned order. Being aggrieved, this application has been filed.3. The short question in the matt...

Sambhu Nath SamantA. Vs. Gobinda Chandra Metya and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. This application is at the instance of the defendant and is directed against the order no.177 dated June 16, 2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Third Court at Tamluk, District Purba Medinipur in Title Suit No.195 of 1985 thereby accepting the report submitted by the learned commissioner holding local investigation.2. The plaintiff/opposite party herein instituted a suit being Title Suit No.195 of 1985 before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Third Court, Medinipur against the petitioner and other opposite parties for eviction and recovery of possession of a licensee, that is, the petitioner. In that suit, the plaintiff has contended that he is the owner of the L.R. Dag No.841 and R.S. Plot No.303 in the District - Purba Medinipur and the defendant/petitioner herein was given possession of the same by the plaintiff as per agreement between the parties. The petitioner is contesting the said suit denying the materials allegations contained in the plaint ...

Ranjita Apartment Owners’association and ors. Vs. Sri Prabir Kumar C ...

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... one with regard to appointment of an arbitrator, the function is discharged as soon as the matter is referred to an arbitrator naming an arbitrator or the arbitral tribunal. in that case, an execution application was dismissed holding the same not maintainable. that decision came out on march 16, 2008 and the division bench decision ..... an arbitrator, namely, r. n. chakraborty, appointed by the honble chief justice of the high court at calcutta under section 11(6) of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. the arbitrator proceeded with the matter and thereafter he submitted an award. being aggrieved, an application for setting aside that award was preferred before the learned district ..... . section 42 is quoted below:-42. jurisdiction.- notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this part or in any other law for the time being in force, where with respect to an arbitration agreement any application under this part has been made in a court, that court alone shall have jurisdiction over .....

Sk. Qumru Alam. Vs. the Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. challenge is to the order dated march 26, 2009 passed by the learned municipal assessment tribunal, first bench, kolkata municipal corporation in appeal no.2171 of 2007. the appellant has preferred this application contending, inter alia, that he entered into an agreement for sale of a .....

Pankaj Kumar HazrA. Vs. Dr. Arabinda Nayak and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. Challenge is to the order no.104 dated January 29, 2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), First Court, Contai in Title Suit No.89 of 2001. The defendant no.3 is the petitioner. The plaintiff/opposite party instituted a title suit being Title Suit No.89 of 2001 before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), First Court, Contai against the opposite party nos.2 & 3 as the defendant nos.1 & 2 and the petitioner herein and the opposite party no.4 herein as the defendant nos. 3 & 4. According to the plaint case, the defendant no.4 was the absolute owner of the suit property and the defendant nos.1 & 2 being the son-in-law and the daughter of the defendant no.4 represented that the defendant no.4 executed and registered two deeds of gift in favour of the defendant nos.1 & 2. By making such representation, the defendant nos.1 & 2 sold out the suit properties in favour of the plaintiff. At the time of taking possession, the defendant no.3, son of the defendant no.4, res...

Baidyanath Modak. Vs. Smt. Swapna Modak and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. Challenge is to the order dated September 5, 2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Second Court, Hooghly in Misc. Appeal No.84 of 1999 thereby reversing the order no.30 dated June 8, 1999 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), First Court, Hooghly in Title Suit No.62 of 1997.2. The petitioner was the defendant no.1 of the title suit filed by the plaintiff/opposite party. The plaintiff instituted the said suit for declaration and partition. In that suit, the defendants in two sets, namely, the defendant nos.1 to 13 in one set and the defendant nos.14 & 15, namely, the opposite party nos.2 & 3, in another set, are contesting the said suit by filing separate written statements. The defendant nos.1 to 13 filed an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of the C.P.C. The defendant nos.14 & 15 filed an objection against that application with the caption objection but, in fact, it was a counter-claim to have a right of possession of comm...

Sree Balajee Seva Samity and ors. Vs. Sunil Kumar Goyal and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... circumstances, if the application for amendment is allowed, it will cause unnecessarily harassment to the opposite parties. no doubt, since the application for pre-emption was instituted before coming into force of the amended provisions of the c.p.c. in 2002, the provision for amendment of the application is to be guided under the old provisions of the c.p ..... ), siliguri in misc. judicial case no.32 of 1997.2. the matter relates to an application for amendment of an application under section 8 of the west bengal land reforms act, 1955. the petitioners and the opposite party nos.3 & 4 filed an application for pre-emption under section 8 of the west bengal land reforms ..... act, 1955 and that application was registered as misc. judicial case no.32 of 1997. the petitioners of that misc. case claimed pre-emption on the basis of that fact that .....

Surajit Mazumdar. Vs. Marjorie Mazumdar and anr.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

1. This application is at the instance of the plaintiffs and is directed against the order no.30 dated June 16, 2009 and the order no.57 dated June 17, 2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Second Court, Alipore in Title Suit No.17 of 2006.2. The short fact is that the plaintiffs/petitioners herein filed the said title suit being Title Suit No.17 of 2006 praying for several counts of declarations, permanent injunction and other reliefs. The contention of the plaintiffs is that they are the joint 50% owners in respect of the 3 storied building at 10/1/C, Swinhoe Street under Police Station Gariahat, Kolkata 700 019. The defendant / opposite party is the wife of late Saroj Kumar Mazumdar and the latter was the uncle of the plaintiffs. The suit properties originally belonged to late Kamal Basini Mazumdar and by a deed of gift dated August 30, 1967, she gifted the said property in equal shares to the plaintiffs jointly to the extent of 50% and to one Binay Krishna Mazum...

Snow View Properties Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

..... nos.2 to 4 are the certificate debtors. the execution proceeding, namely, r. p. proceeding no.99 of 2003 is pending before the learned recovery officer, kolkata debts recovery tribunal i for execution of the recovery certificate to the tune of rs.49,37,106.92 paisa. the certificate holder took steps for attachment of the properties of the snow ..... no.37 dated september 19, 2007, order no.39 dated january 16, 2008 and order no.45 dated july 22, 2008 passed by the learned recovery officer, kolkata debts recovery tribunal i in r. p. case no.99 of 2003 arising out of t. a. no.74 of 1997.2. the opposite party no.1 is the certificate holder and ..... . thus, he submits that the present application is not maintainable. there is no doubt that an appeal to the concerned tribunal is maintainable against the impugned orders under section 30 of the act of 1993. but instead of doing that, this application under article 227 of the constitution of india has been preferred. the decision of air 2001 sc 3208 has .....