Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 2010(2)BomCR77; JT2009(15)SC354; 2009(14)SCALE613; (2010)2SCC261
..... , in our opinion, it is necessary to reiterate the directions issued by this court in the order dated 7th november, 2006, which clearly directed the sra to call the two developers and dispose of their applications for issuance of the letter of intent and pass the appropriate order in accordance with law. ..... , it would be necessary to reproduce the directions issued by this court in the order dated 7th november, 2006 and the directions issued by the high court in the impugned order dated 17th of september, 2009. ..... we are of the considered opinion that by order dated 7th november, 2006, this court had very clearly directed the sra to consider the proposals of ..... of 2004 as also the order dated may 4, 2006 passed by this court in writ petition no. ..... and dispose of their application for issuing the letter of intent and to pass appropriate orders and in accordance with maharashtra, slum areas improvement, clearance and re-development act, 1971 and also strictly following the procedure for submission processing and approval of slum rehabilitation scheme and to award the letter of intent to the developer who satisfies the required qualifications and conditions and regulations and the provision of the act, 1971. 4. ..... 1277 of 2006, and the order dated november 7, 2006 passed by the apex court in slp ..... applications of both the developers for issuance of a letter of intent are to be considered by sra in accordance with the maharashtra, slum areas improvement, clearance and re-development act, 1971. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : [2008(1)JCR38(SC)]; JT2007(5)SC472; 2007(5)SCALE406
..... government are of the opinion that having regard to the nature of inquiry to be made and the other circumstances pertaining to the incident, it would be appropriate that the provisions of sub-sections (2), (3), (4) & (5) of section 5 of the said act should apply to the conduct of this inquiry, by the commission. ..... at this juncture it would be appropriate to take note of what has been stated by ..... exercise of the powers conferred by section 3 read with sub-section (1) of section 5 of the said act, the state government do hereby appoint a commission of inquiry consisting of hon'ble shri justice a. ..... even the notification dated 4th february, 2006 does not indicate it to be of ..... its order dated 27.11.2006 clearly indicated as to why sitting judges should not act as commission.3. ..... 20/2006--whereas it has been reported to the state government that there had been a police firing on the 2nd january 2006 at kalinga nagar, jajpur district, leading to the ..... , february 9, 2006/magha 20, 1927home (special section) departmentnotificationthe 4th february 2006s.r. no. ..... taken, the quantum of force used in anticipating, preventing and handling situations were adequate, inadequate or in excess of requirement and the responsibility for such acts of commission or omission. ..... six months from the date of publication of this notification in the orissa gazette, namely:(i) analysis of the sequence of events and circumstances leading to the police firing at kalinga nagar on the 2nd january 2006. ..... order dated 27.11.2006. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... that the respondent no.3 had never sought to exercise its right to redeem the mortgaged property before action under section 29 of the state financial corporation act, 1951 was taken or even thereafter till it lost upto this court on august 24, 2006 when special leave petition (civil) no.4957 of 2006 was dismissed and, therefore the exercise of right to redeem, which stood extinguished, was not only malafide but also to defeat the judgment of ..... this, it was argued on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 that the ratio laid down in the said judgment would not apply to the facts of present case in as much as in the earlier writ petition no.19 of 2006, the issue of right of redemption could not have been agitated because it was neither available nor raised nor adjudicated and hence the said right was not extinguished. ..... by the appellant is that the respondents have deliberately and willfully violated the order passed by this court on august 24, 2006 by passing resolutions dated february 20, 2008 and april 8, 2008 passed by the board of directors of the respondent no.1 and, therefore, appropriate action should be initiated against the respondents. ..... 601 of 2006 on february 22, 2008 inter alia praying therein for appropriate orders directing approval of the board resolution dated february 20, 2008 which in turn resolved to accept the offer of ..... was keen to complete its title over the suit properties, nothing prevented it from instituting appropriate proceedings to compel the respondent no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... that the respondent no.3 had never sought to exercise its right to redeem the mortgaged property before action under section 29 of the state financial corporation act, 1951 was taken or even thereafter till it lost upto this court on august 24, 2006 when special leave petition (civil) no.4957 of 2006 was dismissed and, therefore the exercise of right to redeem, which stood extinguished, was not only malafide but also to defeat the judgment of ..... this, it was argued on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 that the ratio laid down in the said judgment would not apply to the facts of present case in as much as in the earlier writ petition no.19 of 2006, the issue of right of redemption could not have been agitated because it was neither available nor raised nor adjudicated and hence the said right was not extinguished. ..... by the appellant is that the respondents have deliberately and willfully violated the order passed by this court on august 24, 2006 by passing resolutions dated february 20, 2008 and april 8, 2008 passed by the board of directors of the respondent no.1 and, therefore, appropriate action should be initiated against the respondents. ..... 601 of 2006 on february 22, 2008 inter alia praying therein for appropriate orders directing approval of the board resolution dated february 20, 2008 which in turn resolved to accept the offer of ..... was keen to complete its title over the suit properties, nothing prevented it from instituting appropriate proceedings to compel the respondent no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... and cannot act as appellate authorities examining the correctness, suitability and appropriateness of a ..... in modern nutrition in health and development edited by m.shike and others [lippincott, williams, & wilknis publishers, 2006, p.310] it is observed: iodine is a necessary component of the thyroid hormones, which are required for ..... wp(c) no.4204/2006 on the file of the madras high court (2) wp(c) no.341/2006 on the file of the bombay high court (3) wp(c) no.13082/2006 on the file of the andhra pradesh high court (4) wp(c) no.13354/2006 on the file of the karnataka high ..... while disposing of writ petition (civil) no.80/2006, we have granted six months time to review the ..... in para 3 of the first affidavit filed on 3.4.2006, the respondent specifically admits as follows : ...the respondent has never stated that the use of any non-iodised salt is ..... writ petition (civil) no.175/2006 is filed seeking a direction to the central government to frame a uniform policy for the control of goitre and a direction regarding imposing ban on the manufacture of non-iodised salt all ..... writ petition (civil) no.175/2006 and transfer case (civil) no.11/2002 are delinked from the aforesaid cases which are disposed of, as they do not relate to challenge to rule 44-i of prevention of ..... respondents with wp(c) no.80/2006 and wp (c) no.175/2006 transfer petition (civil) nos.92, 152, 168, 185 and 218 of 2009 o r d e r transfer petition (c) nos.92/2009, 152/2009, 168/2009, 185/2009 and 218/2009 are allowed and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . (iii) wherever the government exercises its power under section 17(1) of the act and there is default in deposit of the amount in terms of section 17(3a) of the act, as explained in this judgment, the concerned government shall take appropriate disciplinary action against the erring officers/officials including making good the loss caused to the government revenue on account of the liabilities towards interest or otherwise, because of such undue delay on the part of ..... section 4 notification must be deemed to have been issued on march 1, 2006 and the compensation must be worked out on that basis ..... view of the discussions above, the compensation has to be fixed with regard to the value of the appellant's land as on the date of filing of the writ petition which was in march, 2006 before the high court ..... high court, vide its judgment dated 28th august, 2006, dismissed the writ petition ..... the notification under section 4 read with sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the act was issued on 14th april, 2002 and possession taken on 4th february, 2003 the writ petitions in question were filed in august 2006, i.e. ..... high court, vide its judgment dated 28th august, 2006, dismissed the writ petition. ..... of 2006, on 28 august 2006 ..... 2006, on 28th august, 2006. ..... by the said order of the high court, the appellants have filed the present appeal impugning the judgment dated 28th august, 2006. 7 ..... the said order of the high court, the appellants have filed the present appeal impugning the judgment dated 28th august, 2006. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... whether the central government is the appropriate government clraa section 2(1) reads as follows:(1) in this act, unless the context otherwise requires,- (a) appropriate government means,-- (i) in relation to an establishment in respect of which the appropriate government under the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), is the central government; (ii) in relation to any other establishment, the government of the state in which that other establishment is situated. 33 ..... b) whether the notification dated 26th july, 2004 is applicable to dial as it is issued by the central government which is not the appropriate government for dial and secondly whether the notification that applies to the `establishment of aai' will be applicable to the `establishment of dial' which only came into existence on 4th april, 2006? ..... indira gandhi international airport tdi karamchari union - lpa no.1065 of 2007 this letters patent appeal was preferred by the union of india against the learned single judge's judgment dated 28th november, 2006 passed in writ petition (c) no.15156 of 2008 on a very limited point of certain observation in the judgment. ..... the learned single judge took notice of the fact that from 4th april, 2006 a new private entity, dial had taken over the airports (domestic and international) ..... learned single judge of the high court after hearing the parties including dial vide judgment dated 28th november, 2006 held that the establishment of aai is no longer in existence and has changed. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... considered the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, we are inclined to accept the submission made on behalf of the appellants that the notification published on 21st november, 1980, under section 6 of the 2006 act, declaring the lands under the possession of the appellants to be vested in the custodian of evacuee property, stood vitiated, as the appellants had been denied an opportunity of explaining that they were not mere occupants ..... after filing the settlement in court and asking the court to take action thereupon, an application was made on behalf of the custodian of evacuee property, jammu and kashmir, for leave to withdraw cmp no.128 of 2006 on the ground that the chief minister had reversed the earlier decision taken on 27/28th march, 2005 and, that, accordingly, the deponent, in the affidavit, was not competent to enter into the settlement, ..... communication not dfi/sg/378 dated 22.2.2003 (iv) that by an appropriate writ, direction or order including a writ in the nature of prohibition respondents be restrained from interfering in the rights of possession of the petitioners in the land and in their levelling of land and ..... the high court shall proceed to pass appropriate orders for acceptance of the out-of-court settlement and for adjustment of the rights of the parties in terms thereof in the lpa as well as in owp no.480 of 2003 and ..... (iii) that by an appropriate writ, direction or order including the writ in the nature of certiorari following notification .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... every public authority is also obliged to maintain all its record duly catalogued and indexed in a manner and the form which facilitates the right to information under this act and ensure that all records that are appropriate to be computerized are, within a reasonable time and subject to availability of resources, computerized and connected through a network all over the country on different systems so that access to such record is facilitated. ..... under the kerala co-operative societies act will not fall within the definition of public authority as defined under section 2(h) of the rti act and the state government letter dated 5.5.2006 and the circular dated 01.06.2006 issued by the registrar of co-operative societies, kerala, to the extent, made applicable to societies registered under the kerala co-operative societies act would stand quashed in the absence of materials to show that they are owned, controlled or substantially financed by the appropriate government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... this is evident from prayer 5 which is as under : issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to direct respondent nos.1 & 2 to act in accordance with the government of india notification no.2/106/2006-re, dated 23rd july, 2009 which stipulates enhancement of the tenure of existing chairman and whole time directors of sebi from three (3) to five (5) ..... (c) no.340 of 2011 was as follows : issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or, direction to quash and declare void constitution of sub- committee of the search-cum-selection committee under shri u.k.sinha, chairman sebi for conducting interview to the post of whole time ..... fulfill one of the eligibility condition as laid down in sub-section (5) of section 4 of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as sebi act ), as well as the qualification contained in government communication, which required that the chairman shall be a person of high integrity. ..... recommended the compensation to be paid to cmd, uti amc on the basis that the compensation should be market competitive to attract appropriate talent from the market.8. ..... he has highlighted that the petitioner does not fulfill the requirements of section 4(5) of sebi act which provides as under:- (5) the chairman and the other members referred to in clauses (a) and (d) of sub-section (1) shall be persons of ability, integrity and standing who have shown capacity in dealing with problems relating to .....
Tag this Judgment!